CLIMATE CHANGE – THE FACTS

Into the Night said:
False authority fallacy.

The Stefan-Boltzmann law does not have a frequency term in it. You are trying to deny that law and add one again, using junk science articles.

The emissivity of Earth is unknown. It is not possible to measure it. The temperature of Earth is unknown.
r=C*e*t^4
Click to expand...

Emissivity is a function of wavelength ffs, you really should go and learn some basic physics.
 
Into the Night said:
Satellites are incapable of measuring absolute temperatures. The emissivity of Earth is unknown.
Click to expand...

Havana Moon said:
Bullshit on steroids!!
Click to expand...

Argument of the Stone.


So, you are taking the position that satellites CAN measure absolute temperatures... Great. Now, please explain (in detail) how satellites supposedly do this...

Also, if you happen to believe that Earth's emissivity IS known, please explain (in detail) how it has been figured out.
 
gfm7175 said:
Argument of the Stone.


So, you are taking the position that satellites CAN measure absolute temperatures... Great. Now, please explain (in detail) how satellites supposedly do this...

Also, if you happen to believe that Earth's emissivity IS known, please explain (in detail) how it has been figured out.
Click to expand...

I have several times already.
 
Into the Night said:
Define 'climate change'. You don't get to dictate energy markets.

.
Click to expand...

Here are two definitions of climate change.

According to the IPCC, “climate change” is defined as,

“[A]ny change in climate over time whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity.”

However, according to the FCCC, “climate change” is something much more specific. It is defined as:

“[A] change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability over comparable time periods.”

The FCCC treats “climate change” as being — by definition — human-caused (and mainly due to greenhouse gases). But, according to the IPCC, climate change is simply “any change in the climate” — it could be human-caused (e.g., greenhouse gases, urban development, land-use change, etc.) or it could be natural (e.g., due to solar variability, changes in oceanic or atmospheric circulation patterns, etc.), or perhaps some combination of them all.

The problems started to occur when the IPCC’s 1st Assessment Report (AR1) was published in 1990. The report provided plenty of evidence that the climate was changing, but it also explained that the climate had always been changing.

The IPCC was unable to say whether the recent climate change was human-caused, natural or both. This became known as the “attribution” problem, and the IPCC’s first attempt at it was very inconvenient for the FCCC.

This fundamental conflict between the FCCC and the IPCC put a lot of pressure on the scientific community.
Click to expand...

https://climatechangedispatch.com/ipcc-scientific-consensus-global-warming/
 
None of our current behavior is even remotely sustainable. The blind rationalizations and determination to ignore very obvious warning signs will not be viewed kindly by future generations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top