Climate change new religion of the leftist

The Dude

Banned
Nobel Prize Winning Physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever: ‘Global warming is a non-problem’
‘I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong.’
‘Global warming really has become a new religion.’
 
Here's Ivar's current employer:

The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank founded in 1984 and based in Chicago. The Institute conducts work on issues including education reform, government spending, taxation, healthcare, education, tobacco policy, global warming, hydraulic fracturing, information technology, and free-market environmentalism.

In the 1990s, the Heartland Institute worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to question or deny the health risks of secondhand smoke and to lobby against smoking bans.[2] More recently, the Heartland Institute is the primary American supporter of climate change denial.[3][4][5][6] It rejects the scientific consensus that global warming poses a significant danger to the planet[7] and that human activity is driving it,[8] and says that policies to fight it would be damaging to the economy.[9]

He gets a big fat check from the oil companies every month. I'm absolutely certain that that has nothing to do with his position.
 
Head and shoulders above any comment you could make, thats for sure....

I think Ivar and I are about equally qualified in this subject, that is, not at all. I'm not the one trying to act like a professional in the subject despite not having qualifications to do so.
 
Modern day climate alarmism has all the markings of a religion.

1) You have original sin - burning fossil fuels

2) you have a prophet - Al Gore

3) you have predictions of end of times and calamities

4) you have the ability to achieve redemption - buy a Prius
 
Yeah, Ivar Giaever's work in superconductor's totally makes him qualified to comment on climate change.

anyone with any sort of knowledge on science can see what a sham the 'climatologists' are pushing. Tell us Water... what additional SCIENCE classes do 'climatologists' take beyond meteorology?

You understand that anyone that comprehends data analysis can see the constant manipulations of data by 'climatologists' for what they are?
 
If you insist on calling the ubiquitous recognition of a worldwide climate phenomena through observation a religion, you must acknowledge that it's adherents are greater in number than Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism combined.
Just saying.
 
If you insist on calling the ubiquitous recognition of a worldwide climate phenomena through observation a religion, you must acknowledge that it's adherents are greater in number than Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism combined.
Just saying.

I seriously doubt that. You really think the vast majority of the world even knows about the so called 'contribution' to warming that is 'caused by man'???

I would be willing to bet that is not the case. I would bet that you wouldn't come close to even a third of the worlds population that has any thoughts on the matter at all.
 
I seriously doubt that. You really think the vast majority of the world even knows about the so called 'contribution' to warming that is 'caused by man'???

I would be willing to bet that is not the case. I would bet that you wouldn't come close to even a third of the worlds population that has any thoughts on the matter at all.

It must be frustrating to argue against universally accepted facts. I feel for you.
 
It must be frustrating to argue against universally accepted facts. I feel for you.

You saying that something is "universally accepted", doesn't make your statement fact; because all you've done is posted it and you failed to include any supporting evidence.

When this "increase in temperature" never occurs, you intend to proclaim that it WOULD HAVE OCCURED if everyone hadn't made the changes that the liberals put forth; aren't you?
 
Back
Top