The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank founded in 1984 and based in Chicago. The Institute conducts work on issues including education reform, government spending, taxation, healthcare, education, tobacco policy, global warming, hydraulic fracturing, information technology, and free-market environmentalism.
In the 1990s, the Heartland Institute worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to question or deny the health risks of secondhand smoke and to lobby against smoking bans.[2] More recently, the Heartland Institute is the primary American supporter of climate change denial.[3][4][5][6] It rejects the scientific consensus that global warming poses a significant danger to the planet[7] and that human activity is driving it,[8] and says that policies to fight it would be damaging to the economy.[9]
Yeah, Ivar Giaever's work in superconductor's totally makes him qualified to comment on climate change.
Yeah, Ivar Giaever's work in superconductor's totally makes him qualified to comment on climate change.

But using your logic, it would mean that you're not qualified to comment on anything; because you've never had a job.
![]()
Head and shoulders above any comment you could make, thats for sure....
Yeah, Ivar Giaever's work in superconductor's totally makes him qualified to comment on climate change.
that's a burn that will leave heat residue for generations........it may in fact, contribute to global warming........But using your logic, it would mean that you're not qualified to comment on anything; because you've never had a job.
![]()
Yeah, Ivar Giaever's work in superconductor's totally makes him qualified to comment on climate change.
If you insist on calling the ubiquitous recognition of a worldwide climate phenomena through observation a religion, you must acknowledge that it's adherents are greater in number than Christianity, Islam, Judaism and Buddhism combined.
Just saying.
I seriously doubt that. You really think the vast majority of the world even knows about the so called 'contribution' to warming that is 'caused by man'???
I would be willing to bet that is not the case. I would bet that you wouldn't come close to even a third of the worlds population that has any thoughts on the matter at all.
that's a burn that will leave heat residue for generations........it may in fact, contribute to global warming........
It must be frustrating to argue against universally accepted facts. I feel for you.