Clapper Must Be 'Sniffing Glue' to Compare Russia Probe to Watergate

anatta

100% recycled karma
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper thinks that the Watergate scandal "pales" in comparison to the President Trump-Russia probe.

“I think if you compare the two that Watergate pales, really, in my view, compared to what we’re confronting now," Clapper said while speaking to reporters at the National Press Club of Australia.

On "America's Newsroom" Mike Huckabee said Clapper must be "sniffing glue" to make an outrageous statement like that.

He pointed out that Watergate involved former President Richard Nixon and multiple high-level government employees, while the Russia probe is centered around unproven allegations about the Trump campaign.

"No smoking gun, no credible evidence that the campaign had not coordination but communication with an ambassador," Huckabee said. "This is absurd. I don't know even where he would come up with this."

He argued that Congress should be more interested in investigating the Obama administration's alleged illegal spying on American citizens.

As for former FBI Director James Comey's much-anticipated testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Huckabee said that if Comey had any evidence of President Trump or his team involved in any wrongdoing, he had obligation to report it earlier.

He said the fact that Comey did not goes to show that the former FBI director does not believe that Trump engaged in any obstruction of justice related to the Russia probe.
 
Huckabee is really hard to take seriously. He's hard to listen to.

Perhaps Clapper's analogy is extreme, but it depends on how things pan out. If there really is something to this, then it is far worse than Watergate.
 
Huckabee is really hard to take seriously. He's hard to listen to.

Perhaps Clapper's analogy is extreme, but it depends on how things pan out. If there really is something to this, then it is far worse than Watergate.

And if there's not?

It will be a fail of historical proportions. Democrats [and the media] don't realize how far out on a limb they've crawled with this.
 
And if there's not?

It will be a fail of historical proportions. Democrats [and the media] don't realize how far out on a limb they've crawled with this.

Oh, please. You like to think that, but it flies in the face of history & reality.

If Trump's investigation ends up with no real findings or indictments, he'll still be 3 fruitless investigations behind Hillary. And the lack of results of those investigations didn't help Hillary.

And don't try explaining how it's "different," or how Hillary is "really guilty, even though..." That's just partisan noise.
 
Oh, please. You like to think that, but it flies in the face of history & reality.

If Trump's investigation ends up with no real findings or indictments, he'll still be 3 fruitless investigations behind Hillary. And the lack of results of those investigations didn't help Hillary.

And don't try explaining how it's "different," or how Hillary is "really guilty, even though..." That's just partisan noise.

Hillary lost.

Get over it.
 
LOL Huckabee? He's a fraud who doesn't even know his own religion. He's a charlatan in the mold of Jerry Falwell.
 
Oh, please. You like to think that, but it flies in the face of history & reality.

If Trump's investigation ends up with no real findings or indictments, he'll still be 3 fruitless investigations behind Hillary. And the lack of results of those investigations didn't help Hillary.

And don't try explaining how it's "different," or how Hillary is "really guilty, even though..." That's just partisan noise.

Just to add to this: whether Republicans want to admit it or not, it appears that Russia was at least involved in meddling in this past election. It might have been independently, but we do not know that at this point.

Given the circumstances, only partisan righties would oppose investigating any potential ties or involvement with campaign operatives. It should be expected. That is something that should be mandatory to at the very least look into.
 
Just to add to this: whether Republicans want to admit it or not, it appears that Russia was at least involved in meddling in this past election. It might have been independently, but we do not know that at this point.

Given the circumstances, only partisan righties would oppose investigating any potential ties or involvement with campaign operatives. It should be expected. That is something that should be mandatory to at the very least look into.

Everyone should insist any investigation involves actually inspecting the DNC "hacked" drives.
 
LOL Huckabee? He's a fraud who doesn't even know his own religion. He's a charlatan in the mold of Jerry Falwell.

And let's not forget, his fugly, fat-ass daughter is a Trumptard insider and currently, his chief paid liar and shill.

Zero credibility from anything called Huckabee.
 
Just to add to this: whether Republicans want to admit it or not, it appears that Russia was at least involved in meddling in this past election. It might have been independently, but we do not know that at this point.

Given the circumstances, only partisan righties would oppose investigating any potential ties or involvement with campaign operatives. It should be expected. That is something that should be mandatory to at the very least look into.

They are skeered they will lose their Signator in Chief, if the truth is revealed about how he got there...
 
Just to add to this: whether Republicans want to admit it or not, it appears that Russia was at least involved in meddling in this past election. It might have been independently, but we do not know that at this point.

Given the circumstances, only partisan righties would oppose investigating any potential ties or involvement with campaign operatives. It should be expected. That is something that should be mandatory to at the very least look into.

What would be Russia's motive for swaying the election to Trump? Didn't Clinton give them more incentive to swing it to her?
 
What would be Russia's motive for swaying the election to Trump? Didn't Clinton give them more incentive to swing it to her?

Ask Russia. I mean, it's hardly a secret at this point that they were pulling for a Trump win. Putin hated Hillary. Trump implied that he was a genius.
 
Ask Russia. I mean, it's hardly a secret at this point that they were pulling for a Trump win. Putin hated Hillary. Trump called implied that he was a genius.

Hillary wouldn't have sucked Putin's dick and gargled his goo like Trumptard does.
 
Back
Top