CIA documents supported Susan Rice’s description of Benghazi attacks

[canceled.2021.1]

Gaddafi was an ALLY of the west in the war on terror. The US and UK were sending terrorists to Gaddafi to be tortured .. AND, he was about to be bestowed with a HUMANITARIAN AWARD from the UN before Obama started bombing a peaceful and proseprous nation ,, in part for the very reason you've said.

Libyan women enjoed more freedom under Gaddafi then anywhere in the arab world .. which made him an enemy of Islamists and Al Queda.

The moment Gaddafi fell, Obama's terrorist posse immediately opened the jails and freed the terrorists.

You have obviously been following this very closely. Why do you think Obama took the route he did with Libya and taking out Ghaddafi?

 

[Bonestorm]

Did you buy it when Bush attacked Iraq?

I can PROVE the Libyan people were NOT with Obama in 35 seconds of less.

But I'm sure you already know that.

I don't think Bush attacking Iraq was part of an NWO conspiracy.

Though for Iraq it made some sense given that US companies couldn't exploit Iraqi oil resources. In Libya it doesn't make much sense at all. U.S. oil interests were on good terms with Qaddafi. No need to take him out to gain access to Libyan oil.

 

[blackascoal]

You have obviously been following this very closely. Why do you think Obama took the route he did with Libya and taking out Ghaddafi?

A. For the very reason that you suggest. To bolster his foreign policy chops .. which in America means to kill lots of innocent people.

B. To steal the resources of Libya and to impose a Rothschilds bank.

Under Gaddafi, Libya has no national debt and no Rothschild bank. Now they have both.

C. Because Obama is a warmonger. The protests throughout the ME are against OBAMA and his drones that kill more innocent people than so-called terrorists.

Obama is on a quest to dominate Africa .. which brings up a crucial point. Only he could attack Africa, including drought-stricken Somali, and get away with it without protest. The MIC and war-profiteers know this .. knew that before he was elected .. and they knew that Africa was the next target.

 

[blackascoal]

I don't think Bush attacking Iraq was part of an NWO conspiracy.

Though for Iraq it made some sense given that US companies couldn't exploit Iraqi oil resources. In Libya it doesn't make much sense at all. U.S. oil interests were on good terms with Qaddafi. No need to take him out to gain access to Libyan oil.

You need to do a bit more research on that brother.

Gaddafi was on a quest to unite Africa and demand that his oil be paid for in the new African currency that he proposed.

Sarkozy called that a threat to the western banking system.

Think about this .. Saddam did the same thing.

If you check you'll see that I am right.

 

[Bonestorm]

You need to do a bit more research on that brother.

Gaddafi was on a quest to unite Africa and demand that his oil be paid for in the new African currency that he proposed.

Sarkozy called that a threat to the banking system.

Think about this .. Saddam did the same thing.

Not buying what you're selling BAC.

 

[Bfgrn]

The small gathering of young people gathered to protest the video was a cover for the attack that was about to begin. They were part of the attack.

It was an pre-planned armed attack with heavy weapons and a professional military operation. They baricaded the streets and set-up stations to repel any rescue attempt.

The Obama Administration knew this truth soon after the attack and long before lying warmingering Susan Rice took to the podium to lie her ass off.

Why are these lies still being told when the facts are known?

Ask Mike Rogers...

Representative Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican and chairman of the House intelligence committee, told CNN there was no sign of intelligence “chatter” leading up to the Benghazi consulate attack that would have warned U.S. officials to take extra precautions.

 

[blackascoal]

Not buying what you're selling BAC.

You don't have to brother.

I don't expect democrats to buy anything that does not support Obama.

Is Gold The Real Reason For Nato’s Action In Libya
http://www.goldbuzzer.com/is-gold-the-real-reason-for-nato-s-action-in-libya/

Obama supporters aren't interested in truth .. just how to protect Obama.

 

[blackascoal]

Ask Mike Rogers...

Representative Mike Rogers, a Michigan Republican and chairman of the House intelligence committee, told CNN there was no sign of intelligence “chatter” leading up to the Benghazi consulate attack that would have warned U.S. officials to take extra precautions.

Obviously failure of intelligence.

There were in BENGHAZI, the world's home and hotbed of terrorists.

 

[Bonestorm]

You don't have to brother.

I don't expect democrats to buy anything that does not support Obama.

Is Gold The Real Reason For Nato’s Action In Libya
http://www.goldbuzzer.com/is-gold-the-real-reason-for-nato-s-action-in-libya/

Obama supporters aren't interested in truth .. just how to protect Obama.

I think it's probably worth noting here that I didn't support Obama's Libya actions. Just for the record.

 

[blackascoal]

I think it's probably worth noting here that I didn't support Obama's Libya actions. Just for the record.

Good for you brother.

 

[Timshel]

I pointed this out in the other thread.

The last three paragraphs...

The Benghazi flap is the sort of situation that intelligence officers dread: when politicians are demanding hard “yes” or “no” answers but evidence is fragmentary and conflicting. The political debate has focused on whether the attack was spontaneous or planned, but the official said there’s evidence of both, and that different attackers may have had different motives. There’s no dispute, however, that it was “an act of terror,” as Obama described it the next day.

“It was a flash mob with weapons,” is how the senior official described the attackers. The mob included members of the Ansar al-Sharia militia, about four members of al-Qaeda in the Maghreb, and members of the Egypt-based Muhammad Jamal network, along with other unarmed looters.

The official said the only major change he would make now in the CIA’s Sept. 15 talking points would be to drop the word “spontaneous” and substitute “opportunistic.” He explained that there apparently was “some pre-coordination but minimal planning.”

 

[cancel2 2022]

That's where you lose me, BAC. I don't really buy into the NWO conspiracy stuff.

He is an intelligent chap but cannot seemingly ever see a straightforward reason for anything without looking for a conspiracy theory instead. What I find incredibly surreal is how the hard Left have seemingly joined forces with the bug eyed right wing loonies as exemplified by Dixie and Alias.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

I think the only real dispute, BAC, is whether the attackers took advantage of a favorable situation or orchestrated the entire event from the start. That's really the only area of dispute I see between what Rice, Carney and the President have said as compared to what you are saying.

So, they just happened to be walking by with heavy weapons and enough people to block off the streets, saw a protest getting rowdy and said 'what the hell, lets go for it'?

You honestly still believe that is a viable scenario?

 

[Timshel]

Too bad this got hijacked. Now it's not gonna be about whether the administration covered anything up and it's all going to be nonsense.

bac's bullshit is boilerplate crazy talk. It is the same kind of crazy you get from any UFOlogist, cryptozooligist, 911-ologists (jk on the "ologists" part for them but they need to sound more official) and all the nutters who see some sort of conspiracy in global warming. They attack the fact that certainty is rather impossible. Any evidence given is just proof of the depth and breadth of the conspiracy. Meanhwhile, even one little kernel of truth is proof of their crazy theory and will regenerate the whole. Any true skeptic can see what he is doing. He's nuts.

 

[blackascoal]

He is an intelligent chap but cannot seemingly ever see a straightforward reason for anything without looking for a conspiracy theory instead. What I find incerdibly surreal is how the hard Left have seemingly joined forces with the bug eyed right wing loonies as exemplified by Dixie and Alias.

Can't wait for you to challenge the information.

Been waiting for that since it happened and I started posting the truth .. but all you can manage to come up with are your feelings about me.

Hardly an intellectual argument.

 

[blackascoal]

Too bad this got hijacked. Now it's not gonna be about whether the administration covered anything up and it's all going to be nonsense.

bac's bullshit is boilerplate crazy talk. It is the same kind of crazy you get from any UFOlogist, cryptozooligist, 911-ologists (jk on the "ologists" part for them but they need to sound more official) and all the nutters who see some sort of conspiracy in global warming. They attack the fact that certainty is rather impossible. Any evidence given is just proof of the depth and breadth of the conspiracy. Meanhwhile, even one little kernel of truth is proof of their crazy theory and will regenerate the whole. Any true skeptic can see what he is doing. He's nuts.

Yet another really dumb ass poster who can't challenge truth and one that I smacked around like a pinata on another thread on this same issue.

Is there ANY intelligenece among Obama supporters?

 

[cancel2 2022]

So, they just happened to be walking by with heavy weapons and enough people to block off the streets, saw a protest getting rowdy and said 'what the hell, lets go for it'?

You honestly still believe that is a viable scenario?

There were and probably still are militias in Bengahazi, I very much doubt that something of significance like a demo outside the US consulate would escape their attention.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Can't wait for you to challenge the information.

Been waiting for that since it happened and I started posting the truth .. but all you can manage to come up with are your feelings about me.

Hardly an intellectual argument.

So apparently their only argument against you is that you and I agree on this one issue (I still love that they think that I am Alias). I guess they really don't like bipartisanship

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Can't wait for you to challenge the information.

Been waiting for that since it happened and I started posting the truth .. but all you can manage to come up with are your feelings about me.

Hardly an intellectual argument.

So apparently their only argument against you is that you and I agree on this one issue (I still love that they think that I am Alias). I guess they really don't like bipartisanship

 

[Timshel]

So, they just happened to be walking by with heavy weapons and enough people to block off the streets, saw a protest getting rowdy and said 'what the hell, lets go for it'?

You honestly still believe that is a viable scenario?

There is not much proof of anyone blocking off the street. Not saying it did not happen but... It does not appear the heavy weapons were used until late, at least the mortars were not. They had no plan to get into the safe house.

As I highlighted in the last paragraph(s) and said before, it was not really spontaneous it was more opportunistic. Also, there were many motivations. Give me two people that want to see Romney lose and I can find fifty different reasons for it. But simple minded Americans lead by a soundbite press might focus on one and claim that explains it all. The administration repeatedly tried to avoid that.

The video was absolutely a part of this, but there is no one reason. There does not seem to be much proof of a pro Quaddafi element, which is what bac has been claiming.