CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirms that John Brennan, James Comey, and Hillary Clinton are likely to be INDICTED over their involvement in Russia
- Thread starter ziggy
- Start date
MAGA
Verified User
I cannot wait to see these bastards in prison
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Scott
Verified User
I believe the Epstein scandal is worthy of further investigation. I -also- believe Russiagate is worthy of further investigation.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
I mean - trump is dismissing the Epstein files as being "made up by Biden, Comey, and Obama". Why can't we say the same thing about Tulsi's "files"?Leave Big Daddy and his lovers alone!!!!
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
There is no, "Russiagate". The entire matter was settled by both the Mueller Report and by a Republican-led investigation before Biden was even elected. trump digging this up now is meant to be a distraction.
Scott
Verified User
You can clearly do it. I would just ask you to consider the possibility that both the Epstein files -and- Russiagate are worthy of further investigation.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Ok. Tell me exactly what you think Obama did? What exactly is the crime?
Scott
Verified User
Absolute nonsense. Well known journalist Aaron Mate has been following Russiagate for years and with Tulsi Gabbard digging in, he's once more on the case. A good article he just published on the subject a few days ago:
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
substack.com
Scott
Verified User
The article I linked to in my previous post gets into his malfeasance. Quoting from its introduction, coloring when Obama is mentioned below in orange, because I know not everyone has a very long attention span here...
**
Although Robert Mueller failed to find an election conspiracy between Donald Trump and Moscow, the former Special Counsel threw a lifeline to the Russiagate narrative by alleging that the Kremlin had engaged in a “sweeping and systematic” effort to get Trump elected and “sow discord” among Americans.
Six years later, that questionable but enduring claim continues to unravel.
According to newly declassified documents, U.S. intelligence leaders concealed high-level doubts about one of Russiagate’s foundational allegations: that Russia stole and leaked Democratic Party material to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. In a September 2016 report that was never made public until now, the NSA and the FBI broke with their intelligence counterparts and expressed “low confidence” in the attribution to Russia.
The previously undisclosed dissent about Russia’s alleged hacking activities in the 2016 election is among several revelations released last week by Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence. In Gabbard’s view, President Obama and senior members of his cabinet “manufactured and politicized intelligence” in its waning months to wage “a years-long coup against President Trump.”
Gabbard’s material adds to a body of evidence that challenges the widely parroted claim about the quality of evidence and the extent of Russian “interference operations” in the 2016 election. These conclusions – based on questionable assertions presented as hard facts – have been falsely portrayed as an intelligence consensus. When Trump, the nation’s commander-in-chief, cast doubt on the Russian interference allegations in a July 2018 news conference, former CIA chief John Brennan denounced him as “nothing short of treasonous.”
It turns out that Trump was not out of sync with the U.S. intelligence community he was accused of betraying.
**
That's just the introduction. Obama is mentioned a total of 17 times in the article itself. Again, it can be seen here:
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
substack.com
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Both this "journalist" and Gabbard are loons, as is anyone who thinks an investigation into an election trump won is going to distract from the mess the administration has made over the Epstein scandal.Absolute nonsense. Well known journalist Aaron Mate has been following Russiagate for years and with Tulsi Gabbard digging in, he's once more on the case. A good article he just published on the subject a few days ago:
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
Trumpet
Verified User
It sure sounds like Aaron Mate maybe a mouth piece for Russia.Absolute nonsense. Well known journalist Aaron Mate has been following Russiagate for years and with Tulsi Gabbard digging in, he's once more on the case. A good article he just published on the subject a few days ago:
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
Maté has testified at United Nations Arria meetings hosted by Russia and China, after being invited by the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations
Aaron Maté - Wikipedia
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
OK this right here, is a lie. So, I'm not reading the rest of this bullshit. The Mueller report found nothing of the kind!
"Notably, Gabbard’s “evidence” contradicts a massive bipartisan 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report that came to the same conclusion as the Mueller report, finding that Russia had “engaged in an aggressive, multi-faceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election” in Trump’s favor."
If you think you and your fellow trumptards are going to get any traction of this Gabbard/trump "Russiagate" conspiracy shit - you're either a total idiot or you're hoping others are!the former Special Counsel threw a lifeline to the Russiagate narrative by alleging that the Kremlin had engaged in a “sweeping and systematic” effort to get Trump elected and “sow discord” among Americans.
Six years later, that questionable but enduring claim continues to unravel.
According to newly declassified documents, U.S. intelligence leaders concealed high-level doubts about one of Russiagate’s foundational allegations: that Russia stole and leaked Democratic Party material to help Trump defeat Hillary Clinton. In a September 2016 report that was never made public until now, the NSA and the FBI broke with their intelligence counterparts and expressed “low confidence” in the attribution to Russia.
The previously undisclosed dissent about Russia’s alleged hacking activities in the 2016 election is among several revelations released last week by Tulsi Gabbard, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence. In Gabbard’s view, President Obama and senior members of his cabinet “manufactured and politicized intelligence” in its waning months to wage “a years-long coup against President Trump.”
Gabbard’s material adds to a body of evidence that challenges the widely parroted claim about the quality of evidence and the extent of Russian “interference operations” in the 2016 election. These conclusions – based on questionable assertions presented as hard facts – have been falsely portrayed as an intelligence consensus. When Trump, the nation’s commander-in-chief, cast doubt on the Russian interference allegations in a July 2018 news conference, former CIA chief John Brennan denounced him as “nothing short of treasonous.”
It turns out that Trump was not out of sync with the U.S. intelligence community he was accused of betraying.
**
That's just the introduction. Obama is mentioned a total of 17 times in the article itself. Again, it can be seen here:
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
Scott
Verified User
Both this "journalist" and Gabbard are loonsAbsolute nonsense. Well known journalist Aaron Mate has been following Russiagate for years and with Tulsi Gabbard digging in, he's once more on the case. A good article he just published on the subject a few days ago:
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
Personal attacks, the bane of any constructive conversation.
Scott
Verified User
It sure sounds like Aaron Mate maybe a mouth piece for Russia.Absolute nonsense. Well known journalist Aaron Mate has been following Russiagate for years and with Tulsi Gabbard digging in, he's once more on the case. A good article he just published on the subject a few days ago:
US intel hid high-level doubts about "Russian interference", docs reveal
The NSA and FBI expressed "low confidence" that Russia hacked and leaked DNC emails to help Trump, documents show. US intelligence leaders concealed this dissent and told a different story.
Maté has testified at United Nations Arria meetings hosted by Russia and China, after being invited by the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the United Nations
Aaron Maté - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I suspect that as an American it can be hard to consider the possibility that what the U.S. does isn't always right and that yes, Russia and China -can- do the right thing sometimes, but it's true. Anyway, you may want to check out his article if you'd like to see the evidence that there's a lot to the Russiagate scandal.
Scott
Verified User
What exactly do you think is a lie from the quote above?
Scott
Verified User
More personal attacks -.- I'm not even a fan of Trump. You really need to stop jumping to conclusions.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
And yet I stand by what I said.
LurchAddams
There Can be Only One!
Yeah. Your gaslighing has failed.
Scott
Verified User
Have you considered that deep down, you don't -want- to contemplate that Russiagate is a stain on Obama and his Administration and that's why you are so quick to engage in personal attacks? It's certainly an easy way to shut down any productive discussion on the matter.