CIA chief addresses ‘doubters’ of Russian hacking report

Guille said:
This really bothers you, doesn't it?
Click to expand...

It should bother everybody. You now have a snake oil salesman with the temperment and vocabulary of an 8th grader or less. A pathological liar. He's managed to piss off large segments of our own citizenry. He lied and insulted his way to the office. Less than half the country thinks he can even handle the job. That's BEFORE he even takes office, when the numbers are normally at their highest.

Sorry, pal, we've got an incompetent boob at the helm. Hopefully, we can make it through the next few years.
 
domer76 said:
It should bother everybody. You now have a snake oil salesman with the temperment and vocabulary of an 8th grader or less. A pathological liar. He's managed to piss off large segments of our own citizenry. He lied and insulted his way to the office. Less than half the country thinks he can even handle the job. That's BEFORE he even takes office, when the numbers are normally at their highest.

Sorry, pal, we've got an incompetent boob at the helm. Hopefully, we can make it through the next few years.
Click to expand...

What do you think of super-delegates? Should we even hold primaries for that matter?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no.....Michigan was certified at 10,704 votes not taking into the account the fake votes in Detroit that would have been thrown out if the recount hadn't been stopped........
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/11/23/donald-trump-wins-michigan-votes/94360852/

interesting that if the recount had gone forward, under Michigan law 37% of the precincts in the city of Detroit would have had to been chucked as vote garbage......
Click to expand...

Well, fuck o dear, then it was 78,000 votes, moron.

Another "if/would" piece of horseshit. Tell me, Einstein, when, in the history of the world did an "if/would" actually take place?
 
Guille said:
What do you think of super-delegates? Should we even hold primaries for that matter?
Click to expand...

I have no opinion. If the Democrats or Republicans think that's their best chance, go for it. When they decide it's not working for them anymore, they'll change it. Clinton still got 55% of the primary votes anyway.
 
domer76 said:
Well, fuck o dear, then it was 78,000 votes, moron.

Another "if/would" piece of horseshit. Tell me, Einstein, when, in the history of the world did an "if/would" actually take place?
Click to expand...
????.....you mean like "if/would" we really didn't have an electoral college?......
 
Nomad said:
Yes, it's just about winning with you all. How you "win" makes zero diffetence.

Thank you for proving how right I am about you... people.

Lack of conscience and soul... people who abandoned their consciences and sold their souls long ago... empty suits now.

The Walking (Brain) Dead.

Again, thanks for being a prime example of all that.

Makes my work so much easier.
Click to expand...


Didn't seem to bother you when Harry Reid was lying about Mitt Romney. Nope, the ends justified the means then.

But, more specifically, how is it that you think Russia influenced this election? You obviously have strong feelings about it so maybe you can provide some specifics. If it is in fact true, I agree it is something to take seriously.

Given that you believe it is true, what do you think of Obama's response to said event? Do you think it is too weak? Too strong? Just right?
 
blacknwhite321 said:
Regardless of what the report ends up saying, the truth is that many hackers in this world are going to attempt whatever they can to hack into major U.S. institutions and major political sources. Our main problem is that under this administration, there didn't seem to be a serious effort to thwart these attempts or attacks that have already occurred. And I don't believe if Hillary had won, that the media would be anywhere near obsessed with this topic as they are now, and they would've given their first-born for somebody to have hacked into Republican emails. If this report says anything, I hope it says exactly what Russia successfully hacked, and how exactly that directly led to Trump's victory, since that is what the major implication has been from the Democratic party even before the report was ever released to anybody...
Click to expand...

Hate to break it to you but hackers have been hacking the government for as long as there has been something to hack. And succeeding.
These guy's became NSA employees when caught as it was preferable to prison time.
 
domer76 said:
Bernie knew the rules, or should have, going in. The Democratic primary process has been in affect since the 80s.
Click to expand...

Interesting. Would you say that the same also applies to those who drone on and on about Hillary winning the popular vote? Hillary knew the rules going in. The Electoral College has been in affect since the ratification of the US Constitution. Hillary campaigned based on the Electoral College.

Doesn't the argument you are applying to Bernie also apply to those who drone on about the popular vote or is it different? If you believe it is different, please explain in detail why you think it is different.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top