CIA chief addresses ‘doubters’ of Russian hacking report

Nomad said:
The idea that you and others feel it's OK that Russia used subterfuge to influence the outcome of a US Presidential election in order to get their preferred candidate in office, a candidate that has extensive business dealings in Russia and who is likely deeply in debt to Russian banks, some or all of which Vladimir Putin is a part owner of, is very disturbing indeed.

Possibly even more disturbing than the Russians' actions themselves.
Click to expand...

Guille said:
Conservatives didn't put Trump in office. I love the fact you and yours don't understand reality.
Click to expand...

Conservatives plus racist, xenophobic jingoistic malanthropic tax cheating anti intellectuals were exactly enough of a minority to exploit the inherent flaws in the electoral process and elect a patronizing incurious gameshow host.
 
Guille said:
Spinning what? Your guys lost. This isn't just about Hillary. No one likes you.
Click to expand...

Yes, it's just about winning with you all. How you "win" makes zero diffetence.

Thank you for proving how right I am about you... people.

Lack of conscience and soul... people who abandoned their consciences and sold their souls long ago... empty suits now.

The Walking (Brain) Dead.

Again, thanks for being a prime example of all that.

Makes my work so much easier.
 
Guille said:
Conservatives didn't put Trump in office. I love the fact you and yours don't understand reality.
Click to expand...

I think the most annoying thing about this whole election is that you & yours think you have some inside info on the American voter, even though Trump won by 107,000 votes in 3 swing states and lost by close to 3 million nationwide.

I have lost track of how many times I have read some variation of "you guys still don't get it."

Best of luck hanging onto that huge 107,000 vote margin. I think - like Brexit - a lot of Americans already have buyer's remorse on this one.
 
Nomad said:
Yes, it's just about winning with you all. How you "win" makes zero diffetence.

Thank you for proving how right I am about you... people.

Lack of conscience and soul... people who abandoned their consciences and sold their souls long ago... empty suits now.

The Walking (Brain) Dead.

Again, thanks for being a prime example of all that.

Makes my work so much easier.
Click to expand...

What a bullshit post. Still going with that winning at all costs meme eh? We had an election and your guys were rejected at all levels of government. I love the fact that you refuse to accept that because that means you won't do anything to change it. Have fun with your coloring books for the rest of your life.
 
Guille said:
What a bullshit post. Still going with that winning at all costs meme eh? We had an election and your guys were rejected at all levels of government. I love the fact that you refuse to accept that because that means you won't do anything to change it. Have fun with your coloring books for the rest of your life.
Click to expand...

Screw you, Komrade stooge.

Have fun gargling Putin's spooge for the rest of YOUR life.
 
anatta said:
the corruption was electoral corruption..as Bernie called it "It's a rigged game".
Are you seriously trying to find daylight between Bernie and the Democratic primary where he ran in their primary??
Click to expand...

Bernie knew the rules, or should have, going in. The Democratic primary process has been in affect since the 80s.
 
Thing1 said:
I think the most annoying thing about this whole election is that you & yours think you have some inside info on the American voter, even though Trump won by 107,000 votes in 3 swing states and lost by close to 3 million nationwide.

I have lost track of how many times I have read some variation of "you guys still don't get it."

Best of luck hanging onto that huge 107,000 vote margin. I think - like Brexit - a lot of Americans already have buyer's remorse on this one.
Click to expand...

Actually, it was 77,000 votes in 3 states. The margins were:

PA - 44,292
WI - 22,748
MI - 9528
 
domer76 said:
Actually, it was 77,000 votes in 3 states. The margins were:

PA - 44,292
WI - 22,748
MI - 9528
Click to expand...

no.....Michigan was certified at 10,704 votes not taking into the account the fake votes in Detroit that would have been thrown out if the recount hadn't been stopped........
http://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2016/11/23/donald-trump-wins-michigan-votes/94360852/

interesting that if the recount had gone forward, under Michigan law 37% of the precincts in the city of Detroit would have had to been chucked as vote garbage......
 
Last edited:
Guille said:
I couldn't help but notice you didn't say you thought it was the right way to do things.
Click to expand...

Not my choice. The Democrats decided it was the right way for them and it has been largely successful. While the EC hasn't worked in two elections when the Republican candidate lost the popular vote, they have managed to win a plurality of the American voter in 6/7 cycles. And 2 two-termers. Unfortunate that a measly 77,000 voters in three states thwarts the will of the plurality of the country. Maybe we should rethink whether that's the right way to do things.
 
domer76 said:
Not my choice. The Democrats decided it was the right way for them and it has been largely successful. While the EC hasn't worked in two elections when the Republican candidate lost the popular vote, they have managed to win a plurality of the American voter in 6/7 cycles. And 2 two-termers. Unfortunate that a measly 77,000 voters in three states thwarts the will of the plurality of the country. Maybe we should rethink whether that's the right way to do things.
Click to expand...

Plurality is the wrong word. You keep losing and the system may be why, experienced operators who may not be the best candidates keep getting the nomination. Maybe it's time to change things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top