Altruism isn't dependent upon any economic system.
Under capitalism, 'the poor ye have always with you'. Under socialism, why? 'From each according to his/her ability, to each according to his/her need'.
Altruism isn't dependent upon any economic system.
If that's what you mean, I answered it: capitalism, like making stone tools, is part of evolution, necessary for humanity to grow past it. You should ask your Mommy to read you some basic Marx.
Altruism isn't dependent upon any economic system.
Charitable people will find a way to help others, no matter what system.It is in the United States for social programs. It is everywhere else for the same and national healthcare. Something has to pay for all that.
Charitable people will find a way to help others, no matter what system.
Yes, it is a large undertaking these days, and Capitalism seems to be creating more poor than it is helping these days. Economist say it is failing, that is why business is looking for new models, like cooperatives.Can you honestly (and I know you are honest) tell me that national healthcare and social programs in this country would be funded by others kindness and charity????? Maybe 100 years ago. Not today.
Is anyone else feeling sorry for the woman? First she lost the nomination to a nobody, now she lost the election to an unlikable political outsider. That must sting, badly. Of course she is scrambling around like a sore loser.
So many of us were hoping the Dems would come up with someone better than Clinton. I had hopes for Sanders, but realized quickly that the political insider Clinton would come out on top.
Schumer makes a good point, but don't just blame Hillary, blame those who put her on top during the primaries.
Yes, it is a large undertaking these days, and Capitalism seems to be creating more poor than it is helping these days. Economist say it is failing, that is why business is looking for new models, like cooperatives.
Why the prancing around? Without capitalism there would be no social programs or social safety nets. Something there idiot (taxes) has to pay for that. How about you get your mother to smack some reality into your rather
confused head.
Yes, we do, obviously, except when the tories interfere to kill people.It is in the United States for social programs. It is everywhere else for the same and national healthcare. Something has to pay for all that.
Duw, they really fixed your head, didn't they! What do you take 'to each according to his need' to mean? We are talking about the time when you and your like are cured and people behave like people rather than like pigs.
You still are stumbling around there Iolo. Speaking around everything but the subject and the fact. Without capitalism there would be no social programs. You might actually have to get a job.
Why don't you get an education, kid? Like living in caves or dressing up in armour, your ludicrous system is a stage on the way to humanity, and probably the crucial one. You and your chums will probably destroy people and the world sooner than lose a cent of their thievings, but we must just hope to tread you under in time.
Trump's populism is specifically aimed at helping US workers.Once Americans & strong unions were seen as participants in the prosperity & benefactors.... Now American workers are seen as the bad guys=the problem.....
Both parties have participated in doing what is in the best interest of wallstreet~NOT MAIN ST........
So it seems that the democrats are openly mocking Clinton at this point, so that she gets the message to shut up and go away
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/dac1f9...90b91b0ba/ss_schumer-rips-hillary:-don’t.html
Politics
Schumer Rips Hillary: Don’t Blame Comey or Russia, ‘Blame Yourself’
The Daily Beast 4 hours ago .
Reactions
Like
Reblog on Tumblr
Share
Tweet
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer ripped his former colleague, Hillary Clinton, over her election loss to President Donald Trump and her subsequent efforts to explain why she lost. “When you lose to somebody who has 40 percent popularity, you don’t blame other things—Comey, Russia—you blame yourself,” Schumer told The Washington Post. “So what did we do wrong? People didn’t know what we stood for, just that we were against Trump. And still believe that.” Schumer’s comments—referring to Clinton blaming Russian meddling and the former FBI director for her loss to Trump
The only one that is showing complete lack of education here is you Iolo. You certainly know nothing about economics, just bullshit philosophy. In other words an idiot with his head up his ass.
I will mention again, as you seem to do everything in your limited abilities to shit or go blind when faced with the fact. Without capitalism there would be no social programs or social safety nets. I have asked you continually to try and prove that fact wrong and all you do is post bullshit. Complete lack of education and a serious lack of reality. Stop calling yourself Welsh, it is quite apparent you are nothing other than a transplant.
Aren't you thick! Without making stone tools there'd be no possibility of your footling system. Should we go back to stone tools? Can't you possibly understand that it is like growing up - it is a matter of stages, and you are only about two yet. Try thinking instead of screaming half-witted insults. You know nothing whatever about me (or, on all the evidence) anything else.
Trump's populism is specifically aimed at helping US workers.
Not by unionization, or traditional protectionism, but by emphasizing what's in the best interest of the US economy
merit based immigration/guest workers that actually leave afterwards,,He should lead by example & not hire foreign workers, yea think??
What is helping?? Does that include higher wages?? Did you get a raise??
All anyone has to do is read this, and the rest of your blustering buffoonery. You cannot deny or discredit the FACT that capitalism is the reason there are social programs and social safety nets. Whomever bothered to tell you that you are educated? Dumber than you.