Christmas is racist

so you believe he didn't die on the cross to save you, but a priest giving you a cracker does?.....I think you had better ask your priest for clarification.....

No one can die to atone for the sins of another.

This is why Jews do not believe there was any redemptive power at all in Jesus' death. Such a belief is unbiblical; it has no basis in the sacred text and no justification in Jewish theology. This doctrine can be seen as an invention for the sake of post-event rationalization, in other words, to give meaning and purpose to the crucifixion after the fact.

Some Christians may choose to interpret other verses in the Bible to indicate the opposite, that one CAN die for the sins of another. If that were the case, this would mean that Gd changed His mind, or that He did not mean what He said in Deuteronomy 24:16: 'Every man shall be put to death for his own sin.'

But Gd does not change either His mind or His nature, as we read in Malachi 3:6,

For I am the Etrnl, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

In a newer technique, some Christians are now quoting rabbinic writings to make it seem as if the rabbis accepted this concept of vicarious atonement. However, even if several respected rabbis did agree with this idea, we must still go by what the Bible states, and the Bible states, in no uncertain terms, 'Every man shall be put to death for his own sin.'
 
The Bible is clear, and it is consistent: one person cannot die for the sins of another.

agreed....that is why it took a God......



in Jeremiah 31:29-30, the prophet says: 'In those days they shall say no more, The fathers have eaten a sour grape, and the children's teeth are set on edge. But every one shall die for his own iniquity: every man that eateth the sour grape, his teeth shall be set on edge.'

excellent....thank you.....and Jeremiah 31 goes on to say...
“The days are coming,” declares the Lord,
“when I will make a new covenant
with the people of Israel
and with the people of Judah.
32 It will not be like the covenant
I made with their ancestors
when I took them by the hand
to lead them out of Egypt,
because they broke my covenant,
though I was a husband to[d] them,[e]”
declares the Lord.
33 “This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel
after that time,” declares the Lord.
“I will put my law in their minds
and write it on their hearts.
I will be their God,
and they will be my people.
34 No longer will they teach their neighbor,
or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’
because they will all know me,
from the least of them to the greatest,”
declares the Lord.
“For I will forgive their wickedness
and will remember their sins no more.”

ironically, this where the goyim begin doing exactly what you asked......begin believing that the incarnate God died to save us from our sins......because we are the neighbors (34) who now have the knowledge of God written on our hearts.....
 
Last edited:
so you believe he didn't die on the cross to save you, but a priest giving you a cracker does?.....I think you had better ask your priest for clarification.....

Protestantism is all about picking-and-choosing what to accept from scripture, and what to ignore. You utterly ignore Christ's words from the Last Supper, because it goes against your theology. Without the crucifixion, the Last Supper would be meaningless, and without the Resurrection, there would be no living presence in the Eucharist.
 
Protestantism is all about picking-and-choosing what to accept from scripture, and what to ignore. You utterly ignore Christ's words from the Last Supper, because it goes against your theology. Without the crucifixion, the Last Supper would be meaningless, and without the Resurrection, there would be no living presence in the Eucharist.

I could as easily say the same about you.........however, I will let it rest with your error in thinking that the RCC is of equal standing with Christ in the role of salvation........your church, your priests and your sacraments are simply irrelevant......
 
I could as easily say the same about you.........however, I will let it rest with your error in thinking that the RCC is of equal standing with Christ in the role of salvation........your church, your priests and your sacraments are simply irrelevant......

The Church is an instrument of the Holy Spirit, and has been since Pentecost. Calling aspects of the Gospel "irrelevant," is the same old nonsense that was meaningless before 1517, and remains so to this day. Whether baptism, reconciliation, marriage, or the anointing of the sick are necessary for salvation, they are nevertheless customs that Christ showed favor for by participating in them and/or instituting them. But, He declared Holy Communion necessary for salvation, and He assigned to the Apostles their offices, which were blessed by the Holy Spirit on Pentecost.
 
Calling aspects of the Gospel "irrelevant,"

I didn't.....I said your priests and what they do are irrelevant......they aren't mentioned in the gospels.....

He declared Holy Communion necessary for salvation

well no, but in any event, we celebrate communion regularly........as an elder, I help distribute it.....

He assigned to the Apostles their offices

well no....but if you want to wear funny hats, I'm not one to object.....
 
I didn't.....I said your priests and what they do are irrelevant......they aren't mentioned in the gospels.....



well no, but in any event, we celebrate communion regularly........as an elder, I help distribute it.....



well no....but if you want to wear funny hats, I'm not one to object.....

So, again, you don't really care what the Gospels say, as long as you get to practice only what you want to believe. Protestantism is more of a rebellion against scripture than tradition and the Church structure.
 
Back
Top