Chris Christie and the Bridge Scandal

Superfreak said:
Again Garud... just shouting his job title isn't enough. WHAT did he manage?
Click to expand...

Looking back, I never claimed he managed anything, I only stated his job title. I don't know that he managed anything, I assume he did, but IDK. For voters.. It wont matter they don't pay enough attention to see what he managed, they will simply hear that he was a MANAGING DIRECTOR.
 
Jarod said:
Looking back, I never claimed he managed anything, I only stated his job title. I don't know that he managed anything, I assume he did, but IDK. For voters.. It wont matter they don't pay enough attention to see what he managed, they will simply hear that he was a MANAGING DIRECTOR.
Click to expand...

LMAO... funny how you never 'claim' anything. Typical lawyer.
 
Tell us Garud... if he was elected Governor in Ohio, despite his 'managing director' title at Lehman, in a state that has voted Dem for President the past two election cycles... how is it that you think it will hurt him NOW? He was much closer in time to the Lehman collapse when he ran for governor.
 
Superfreak said:
Tell us Garud... if he was elected Governor in Ohio, despite his 'managing director' title at Lehman, in a state that has voted Dem for President the past two election cycles... how is it that you think it will hurt him NOW? He was much closer in time to the Lehman collapse when he ran for governor.
Click to expand...
He barely won, I know nothing about his opponent, but it was not Secretary Clinton.
 
Getting this thread back on track, apparently the US Attorney's Office in New Jersey is looking into the matter. That can't be good.
 
Jarod said:
He barely won, I know nothing about his opponent, but it was not Secretary Clinton.
Click to expand...

Again... it has nothing to do with how he would fare against Clinton. I don't think he could beat her. The point is that he won, in a state that has voted for Dems for President, despite his former work history. Yet somehow you think that issue would be his undoing.
 
Superfreak said:
Again... it has nothing to do with how he would fare against Clinton. I don't think he could beat her. The point is that he won, in a state that has voted for Dems for President, despite his former work history. Yet somehow you think that issue would be his undoing.
Click to expand...

I think it would hurt him, never said it would be his undoing. I think it would make his candidacy less viable.
 
Jarod said:
I think it would hurt him, never said it would be his undoing. I think it would make his candidacy less viable.
Click to expand...

LMAO... keep spinning Garud... he worked for a firm that went bankrupt... it happens. I would be willing to bet Hillary has bigger skeletons than that.
 
Jarod said:
I think it would hurt him, never said it would be his undoing. I think it would make his candidacy less viable.
Click to expand...

His presumed candidacy never had legs except from the leftstream media and leftist dimwits like you engaging in wishful thinking and giving political advice to Republicans; quite amusing.

Anyone campaigning against the fat fucker would only have to keep replaying the video of Christie hugging Obama to doom any chances he had. Now they can just let the leftstream media do their dirty work.

But alas, the leftstream media is much more outraged by this scandal than they were the fiasco of Benghazi resulting in four Americans dying horrible deaths and the efforts to cover it up as a spontaneous protest; why do you suppose that is dunce?
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO... keep spinning Garud... he worked for a firm that went bankrupt... it happens. I would be willing to bet Hillary has bigger skeletons than that.
Click to expand...

Seriously, you believe that being a MANAGING DIRECTOR at that firm, is the same thing to the electorate as having worked for a firm that went bankrupt?

You are smarter than that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top