Cheryl Mills refused to answer incriminating questions.....

Rune said:
Read post#3 and get back to me simpleton.
Click to expand...
Indeed I see the word prosecutors, but again I ask the same question. What prosecutors? There is Mills, her attorney, the FBI and the State dept reps, so what prosecutors were there? You have not answered, and nothing in post number 3 answers the question either.
 
TheDonald said:
Indeed I see the word prosecutors, but again I ask the same question. What prosecutors? There is Mills, her attorney, the FBI and the State dept reps, so what prosecutors were there? You have not answered, and nothing in post number 3 answers the question either.
Click to expand...

Obviouly there were prosecutors or they couldn't have objected eh retard?
 
Rune said:
Obviouly there were prosecutors or they couldn't have objected eh retard?
Click to expand...

if she is being questioned by prosecutors, then the Department of Justice is already involved and charges have been filed......have you heard of that happening, child?......
 
Rune said:
Obviouly there were prosecutors or they couldn't have objected eh retard?
Click to expand...

I can think of at least two possible explanations.......one, the Washington Post reporter is as ignorant about what is going on as you are.......2) the "people" that the Washington Post reporter was quoting are as ignorant about what is going on as you are......then, of course there is always the possibility that Chrispy is lying in post #3.....I don't have a subscription to the WP so I can't read the article for myself.....
 
Rune said:
Obviouly there were prosecutors or they couldn't have objected eh retard?
Click to expand...
What prosecutors? I am just asking. As for the objection Mills and her lawyer objected to Mills incriminating herself. But you can not understand that, because you are voting for a criminal......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I can think of at least two possible explanations.......one, the Washington Post reporter is as ignorant about what is going on as you are.......2) the "people" that the Washington Post reporter was quoting are as ignorant about what is going on as you are......then, of course there is always the possibility that Chrispy is lying in post #3.....I don't have a subscription to the WP so I can't read the article for myself.....
Click to expand...

So you already read your ten free articles for May?
 
TheDonald said:
What prosecutors? I am just asking. As for the objection Mills and her lawyer objected to Mills incriminating herself. But you can not understand that, because you are voting for a criminal......
Click to expand...

No you lying retard.
The question broached attorney/client priviledge.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top