Cheryl Mills refused to answer incriminating questions.....

T

TheDonald

Banned
What is she scared of? The long arm of the law will be there, they already know who you are and where u hide.

Weehaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ride em dogie
 
"Near the beginning of a recent interview, an FBI investigator broached a topic with longtime Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that her lawyer and the Justice Department had agreed would be off-limits, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Mills and her lawyer left the room — though both returned a short time later — and prosecutors were somewhat taken aback that their FBI colleague had ventured beyond what was anticipated, the people said."

The questions that were considered off-limits had to do with the procedure used to produce emails to the State Department so they could possibly be released publicly, the people said. Mills, an attorney herself, was not supposed to be asked questions about that — and ultimately never was in the recent interview — because it was considered confidential as an example of attorney-client privilege, the people said.

So far, investigators have found scant evidence tying Clinton to criminal wrongdoing, though they are still probing the case aggressively and charges have not been ruled out, U.S. officials have said. In recent weeks, they have been interviewing Mills and other aides. One former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, Bryan Pagliano, was granted immunity so he would cooperate as part of the probe. There is no indication a grand jury has been convened in the case."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...e5e0e8-161c-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html
 
christiefan915 said:
"Near the beginning of a recent interview, an FBI investigator broached a topic with longtime Hillary Clinton aide Cheryl Mills that her lawyer and the Justice Department had agreed would be off-limits, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Mills and her lawyer left the room — though both returned a short time later — and prosecutors were somewhat taken aback that their FBI colleague had ventured beyond what was anticipated, the people said."

The questions that were considered off-limits had to do with the procedure used to produce emails to the State Department so they could possibly be released publicly, the people said. Mills, an attorney herself, was not supposed to be asked questions about that — and ultimately never was in the recent interview — because it was considered confidential as an example of attorney-client privilege, the people said.

So far, investigators have found scant evidence tying Clinton to criminal wrongdoing, though they are still probing the case aggressively and charges have not been ruled out, U.S. officials have said. In recent weeks, they have been interviewing Mills and other aides. One former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, Bryan Pagliano, was granted immunity so he would cooperate as part of the probe. There is no indication a grand jury has been convened in the case."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...e5e0e8-161c-11e6-aa55-670cabef46e0_story.html
Click to expand...


And finally we have the underlying truth that was conveniently left out of the OP.

I guess when you're on a witch hunt and out to get someone...cough-Hillary-cough...facts and the truth aren't so important.
 
this has been troubling me since this story first came out......

christiefan915 said:
Mills, an attorney herself, was not supposed to be asked questions about that — and ultimately never was in the recent interview — because it was considered confidential as an example of attorney-client privilege, the people said.
Click to expand...

but.....
As an employee of the United States Department of State, Mills was Counselor to the Secretary of State; it is unclear under the Federal Rules of Evidence whether Attorney–client privilege applies to these communications.[20] Law Professor Patricia Salkin writes in The Urban Lawyer that government lawyers would be well advised to caution their government clients, particularly if the client is believed to be an individual public official, about the uncertainty of the privilege for what may be about to be disclosed [21] Mill's attorney raised this protection in May 2016, under questioning by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in connection with the e-mail investigation.[22] In 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reiterated that government lawyers may not exercise an attorney-client privilege in an effort to shield information from a grand jury.[23]
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheryl_Mills
 
christiefan915 said:
She's not in front of a grand jury.
Click to expand...

so you think she has attorney client privilege but loses it only in front of a grand jury?......sorry Chrispy......there is no court decision anywhere that says she DOES have an attorney client privilege......there is one which says she doesn't.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so you think she has attorney client privilege but loses it only in front of a grand jury?......sorry Chrispy......there is no court decision anywhere that says she DOES have an attorney client privilege......there is one which says she doesn't.......
Click to expand...

Why don't you email the JD and the FBI with your legal opinion? I don't suppose this was ever brought up to them. </sarcasm>
 
christiefan915 said:
Why don't you email the JD and the FBI with your legal opinion? I don't suppose this was ever brought up to them. </sarcasm>
Click to expand...
Everyone involved in this issue is a criminal, including the Chief of the FBI who is doing nothing, and has said that he has no timetable in prosecuting this. Tell me Comey, do the people have the right to know what they are voting for, and if Hillary Clinton dies of natural causes 25 years from now and the FBI is still investigating, is this proper and fair to America?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top