CBS says starting today they will be reporting the news more from the average American perspective rather than solely the opinions of liberal elites

Because you’ve moved the goal post. You stated they were ignoring obvious stories and that was not true, both stories were widely covered, you didn’t specify a specific time in your original statement. I was responding to your original statement, and what I said was correct.

Fast Lane:
“MSM has been busy ignoring obvious stories when they go against the bias. Joe Biden's cognitive decline and Hunter's laptop are a couple examples of them ignore huge stories.”
So you are saying they didn’t report them when they actually were real news. Two year too late to you is just fine. You should be a left wing reporter for the MSM

FOLKS this is the kind of mind bending crap that the LEFT WINGED media tries to get away with.
 
If that was the actual case MAGA will be furious with them when they don’t worship their Messiah 24/7

Ellison will change his tune when CBS’s ratings start heading toward the toilet
lol. I think he changed his tune because See B.S. Nooz ratings were heading toward the toilet. I also think that without changing leadership you won't be able to deswamp the Nooz swamp.
 
It's the smart move. After the exposure that Nick Shirley gave them, the dinosaur media is reeling. CBS is the first to decide to start reporting the facts. It's the ONLY way the old media can keep from sliding into irrelevance.
What the fuck does MAGA’s sudden golden boy have to do with a CBS anchor?
 
CBS had an excellent investigative reporter Katherine Herridge . She has degrees from Harvard and Columbia but she is surprisingly even-handed. Her middle of the line approach pissed off a lot of her coworkers and they laid her off and confiscated her confidential files. Which they were later forced to return. So I have a problem believing CBS will change their ways.
She was fired for refusing to comply with a court order, the last thing Ellison with his new makeover wanted to do was get involved in a legal battle over a journalist protecting their sources
 
The issue is you choose which facts to produce...

Dan Rather just "reported the facts" that were literally made up, falsified, and directly showed that See B.S. Nooz was willing to sell their soul to hurt political "opponents"... News agencies shouldn't have "opponents" but they do. Pretending that news isn't deliberately leading people down a path towards approved opinions is just absolutely absurdly naive.
Not the facts, rather how you frame them to fit into the portrait you want to project
 
CBS isn't going to change much; they are simply sucking up to people too stupid to know any different. They are trying to appease people with minimal effort. You'll hear a lot of butt smooching because, in the end, flattering them is all you have to do with Trump and his MAGA moobs. If you're hoping for Fox 2.0. You'll be disappointed.
But it can be done subtly, if you ever watched NewsNation cable news you can recognize it, Fox soft. But you are correct, MAGA doesn’t have the patience to recognize the change
 
lol. I think he changed his tune because See B.S. Nooz ratings were heading toward the toilet. I also think that without changing leadership you won't be able to deswamp the Nooz swamp.
This won’t do it, a few more instances as the recent latest Sixty Minutes censorship episode will cast the network as Fox soft and turn away viewers looking for news rather than infotainment
 
IF THE CBS ANXHOR DOES NOT REPORT THE STORY FAIRLY THE ANCHOR MY BE LOOKING FOR A NEW JOB SOON. PEOPLE DON’T LIKE BEING LIED TO..
No credible news network is going to run unverified videos from an internet podcaster, and if one did, crossing over to framed political infotainment, they will fall quickly in viewership
 
No credible news network is going to run unverified videos from an internet podcaster, and if one did, crossing over to framed political infotainment, they will fall quickly in viewership
Oh gee they could do something radical like sending a good investigative. Reporter to Minnesota to fairly look at the facts. What a radical idea.
 
Why did you not answer my question. When did these "widely published" news articles about Biden's dementia and Hunter's real laptop first begin to be widely published by the MSM?
When? When they were verified

When the laptop was “exposed” access to the laptop was solely thru Rudy, that’s the “truth ain’t the truth” Rudi, and that is why it was not covered extensively at the time. Reporting on Biden’s health was coverage of the WH’s responses thereby acknowledging the suspicion, did you think they, or any credible news source, was going to report directly that the President was senile? They don’t do it today with Trump
 
Oh gee they could do something radical like sending a good investigative. Reporter to Minnesota to fairly look at the facts. What a radical idea.
Facts have been there, the scandal has been under investigation for several years now, one podcasters unverified video didn’t change much, in fact, if it weren’t that the culprits were largely Black immigrants, the attention wouldn’t be where it is today
 
Facts have been there, the scandal has been under investigation for several years now, one podcasters unverified video didn’t change much, in fact, if it weren’t that the culprits were largely Black immigrants, the attention wouldn’t be where it is today
It is strange that the government is acting now that this “unverified “ video got over 120,000,000 views. But we have competent leaders now so…..
 
Because you’ve moved the goal post. You stated they were ignoring obvious stories and that was not true, both stories were widely covered, you didn’t specify a specific time in your original statement. I was responding to your original statement, and what I said was correct.

Fast Lane:
“MSM has been busy ignoring obvious stories when they go against the bias. Joe Biden's cognitive decline and Hunter's laptop are a couple examples of them ignore huge stories.”
their go to move was to call nick shirley a racist and say he was misrepresenting and being racist.

that's denying the story.

we're not as retarded as your dumb cuck husband who tells you your smart.
 
When? When they were verified

When the laptop was “exposed” access to the laptop was solely thru Rudy, that’s the “truth ain’t the truth” Rudi, and that is why it was not covered extensively at the time. Reporting on Biden’s health was coverage of the WH’s responses thereby acknowledging the suspicion, did you think they, or any credible news source, was going to report directly that the President was senile? They don’t do it today with Trump
The Biden FBI had the laptop and knew it was real very early on.. The laptop had hundreds of email and a lot of their senders or recipientscverifiedctheirvauthetencity. When our news finally got around checking it they found out it was real they have no excuses. Believe me if Trump was actually senile the news would be reporting it. :laugh:
 
It is strange that the government is acting now that this “unverified “ video got over 120,000,000 views. But we have competent leaders now so…..
The government in Minnesota was prosecuting fraud before this video. The government was paying attention, people weren’t.

“Although the fraud allegations have received national attention under the Trump administration in recent months, local outlets have reported that fraud in the state has been going on for over a decade, with some resulting in guilty pleas in 2016.”

 
Back
Top