CBO Finds 3.7 Million Jobs Created by Stimulus

[Cancel 2016.2]

It gets way too unconsciously homoerotic without us. You really need us here.

Of course we do.... otherwise we would be limited to rational discussions. Got to have some of the 'crazy' injected into the topics every now and again.

 

[Bonestorm]

so you just 'construed' that I was magically referring to the previous quarter? Why not previous year? Or decade? You just went with a period that would make my statement appear to be extreme.

Your statement was extreme. Extremely wrong.

Even though in reading this thread you can see clearly that I have been discussing employment. When you KNOW that employment data comes out monthly. When you can see that I have been discussing unemployment in terms of not only what it was at the time of the stimulus being signed... which was FEBRUARY of 2009, but also with regards to the unemployment comparison from when the stimulus bill started to have an effect... which was (as you stated) in the summer of 2009. Yet despite all of that.... you decided that you would just 'construe' that I meant the previous quarter?

Like I said... you are a fucking hack.

I believe we already trod this particular piece of real estate. You think I'm a hack for construing "prior to the stimulus" to mean prior to the stimulus. I'm OK with that.

ROFLMAO... Again you fucking hack.... NOWHERE.... and I do mean NOWHERE.... did I pretend/claim/state that GDP now is about the same as it was during the collapse. NOWHERE.

Now AGAIN, you fucking hack, my comments were on where UNEMPLOYMENT was.... NOT GDP. AGAIN, you fucking hack, do you understand the difference between unemployment and GDP? You do know they aren't the same thing..... right?

I get it. You think I'm a hack. Understood. You think we were better off prior to stimulus when the economy was in the midst of a deep recession and had the steepest quarterly decline in GDP since 1958 followed by the steepest quarterly decline since 1980. Again, I'm OK with that.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Your statement was extreme. Extremely wrong.

You mean 'your idiotic interpretation' of my statement is wrong.

I believe we already trod this particular piece of real estate. You think I'm a hack for construing "prior to the stimulus" to mean prior to the stimulus. I'm OK with that.

LMAO.... yes, you are a complete fucking hack. Again, do you deny that unemployment numbers come out on a monthly basis? Do you deny that I have already discussed what it is I ACTUALLY MEAN by that?

There was NOTHING for you to 'construe'. It was all laid out for you. YOU just wanted to create a STRAW MAN.

I get it. You think I'm a hack. Understood. You think we were better off prior to stimulus when the economy was in the midst of a deep recession and had the steepest quarterly decline in GDP since 1958 followed by the steepest quarterly decline since 1980. Again, I'm OK with that.

You fucking hack. Again, that is NOT what I stated. You are just creating a straw man. Since you are insistent upon doing so, we are done.