Catholic school vice principal dismissed for being in gay "marriage"

[canceled.2021.1]

When an adult molests a 7 year old, the gender of the child is largely irrelevant, since they bear little resemblance to an adult. The molester is interested in a child.

Since most homosexuals do not molest children, your attempt as making this an issue about gays is obviously bogus. Children need to be protected from child molesters.

So a catholic priest that only molests boys is heterosexual?

Your obfuscation and defense of queers is very telling. Maybe you are hiding your own homosexual tendencies?

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Nobody said they are the "same thing", did they?

You did. When you claimed your question "If a male has sex with another male, he is homosexual unless the other male is under 18 years of age?" Had a 'Yes or No' answer.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

If WB is right, wouldn't a molester be an equal-opportunity pervert?

generally they are easy-opportunity perverts.....

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

So a catholic priest that only molests boys is heterosexual?

Your obfuscation and defense of queers is very telling. Maybe you are hiding your own homosexual tendencies?

No, that is not what I said. I never called them heterosexual. You are the one demanding that they be either homosexual or heterosexual.

 

[Damocles]

So a catholic priest that only molests boys is heterosexual?

Your obfuscation and defense of queers is very telling. Maybe you are hiding your own homosexual tendencies?

A catholic priest who only molests pre-pubescent boys is a pedophile.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

You did. When you claimed your question "If a male has sex with another male, he is homosexual unless the other male is under 18 years of age?" Had a 'Yes or No' answer.

If a 16 year old male has sex with a 16 year old male is that a homosexual relationship?

How about a 26 year old male and a 16 year old male?

Where are the lines for your definitions? It is amazing the knots you twist yourself into in order to defend immoral queers.

 

[Big Money]

If a male has sex with another male, he is homosexual unless the other male is under 18 years of age?

And your answer was...?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

A catholic priest who only molests pre-pubescent boys is a pedophile.

Why isn't he a homosexual as well? I am not saying that he is not a pedophile. You seem to be saying that the terms heterosexual and pedophile are mutually exclusive. Are they? If so why?

 

[Big Money]

A catholic priest who only molests pre-pubescent boys is a pedophile.

Isn't he a homosexual pedophile?

 

[PostmodernProphet]

So a catholic priest that only molests boys is heterosexual?

a catholic priest who molests fifteen year olds is likely homosexual......a catholic priest who molests nine year olds is likely a pedophile......it is unlikely you will find a catholic priest who molests both......

 

[Big Money]

You are the one demanding that they be either homosexual or heterosexual.

Should they be described as "asexual"?

 

[Big Money]

a catholic priest who molests fifteen year olds is likely homosexual......a catholic priest who molests nine year olds is likely a pedophile......it is unlikely you will find a catholic priest who molests both......

Naturally you can support that assertion, somehow...can't you?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

a catholic priest who molests fifteen year olds is likely homosexual......a catholic priest who molests nine year olds is likely a pedophile......it is unlikely you will find a catholic priest who molests both......

You are blurring lines. Are being a pedophile and a homosexual mutually exclusive?

If so why?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

No, that is not what I said. I never called them heterosexual. You are the one demanding that they be either homosexual or heterosexual.

Are they asexual? Why can't they be both homosexual and a pedophile? Why are making it out to be that they are mutually exclusive? Is it because of your desire to defend homosexuality at all costs?

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Naturally you can support that assertion, somehow...can't you?

obviously for the obvious.....

 

[Big Money]

generally they are easy-opportunity perverts.....

And your statistical evidence for that assertion is...where?

If you are correct, you have no difficulty linking to reams of statistics showing the arrest and conviction of adults who molested boys and girls with equal alacrity.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

If a 16 year old male has sex with a 16 year old male is that a homosexual relationship?

How about a 26 year old male and a 16 year old male?

Where are the lines for your definitions? It is amazing the knots you twist yourself into in order to defend immoral queers.

The line I have consistently used is puberty. You are a straight male. There are plenty of 16 year old girls who would provide visual stimulation for you (if you were unaware of their age). But I doubt there are any 7 year old girls that would do the same.

 

[Big Money]

obviously for the obvious.....

That would be a "no".

Thanks for playing.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

The line I have consistently used is puberty. You are a straight male. There are plenty of 16 year old girls who would provide visual stimulation for you (if you were unaware of their age). But I doubt there are any 7 year old girls that would do the same.

Why in your view are homosexuality and pedophia mutually exclusive?

 

[Big Money]

The line I have consistently used is puberty. You are a straight male. There are plenty of 16 year old girls who would provide visual stimulation for you (if you were unaware of their age). But I doubt there are any 7 year old girls that would do the same.

And your personal doubts are scientifically acceptable...