Cannot catch Covid outside says professor

Oh dear, you just make stuff up. Washington had an outdoor mask wearing policy and I'm pretty sure it wasn't the only one.

https://mayor.dc.gov/release/mayor-...s-order-masks-extends-public-health-emergency

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/me...oo-paranoid-to-follow-the-science/ar-BB1fWFD8

Both Washington and Washington DC (the reference you gave). They are not the same thing.
Pardon my pickiness, but us many folks here in the State of Washington do get kind of bent out of shape about that sort of thing. :D
 
Time for some more rioting, then.

Who is this dopey looking weirdo

profilepic62_4.gif
 
Define 'real'. Define 'life'.

No equivocation here. Fallacy fallacy. These are not opposite meanings either.

You seem to be having a lot of trouble with English.

I did define real but you just keep asking anyway. So whats the point? Note the difference between how was asked. Define your mom.
 
Define 'real'. Define 'life'.

No equivocation here. Fallacy fallacy. These are not opposite meanings either.

You seem to be having a lot of trouble with English.

Those are totaly polar opposite meanings. How not? A phrase having unrelated or polar opposite meanings simultaneously is absolutely equivocation fallacy. How not? Getting tired of your shit stupid method of citing fallacies withoit showing basis. Thats not how its done. Yaknow fk you, define your mom.
 
You never miss an opportunity to be a dick, why?
I guess he can't help it! :D
"The science says ..." has become a national refrain that anyone can repeat to thwart, immediately and permanently, any criticism that might be coming their way.
Very true. There is no science involved here at all. It's become a proof by buzzword, a fallacy.
For years we’ve been told to "listen to the science" on climate change.
There isn't any, obviously. The Church of Global Warming denies the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. They also deny probability and statistical mathematics.
Since the coronavirus pandemic began, we’ve been told to "listen to the science" on how the virus spreads and what steps we should take to combat it.
There isn't any, obviously. The Church of Covid denies most of microbiology, biology, aerodynamics, fluid dynamics,engineering specifications (specifically N95 and Medical Class 1) and deny probability and statistical mathematics.
This has led to some common-sense lifestyle changes: wear a mask indoors, let workers who can work remotely do so, etc.
None of it is going to impress an airborne virus. Masks are completely ineffective against a virus. This includes N95 and Medical Class 1 (surgical) masks. Covid19 is in the air, everywhere, and on every surface.
It has also led to some silly rules: restaurants barred from selling alcohol after 10 p.m. (because that’s when COVID-19 emerges for its nocturnal mischief!),
Agreed. Pretty silly. It has also led to the use of plastic barriers at cash registers and between restaurant booths. Makes no difference. Air just flows around these.
national parks closed (so people can stay cooped up indoors for the good of their health),
Yellowstone Natl Park had 1.588 million visitors in 2021. Doesn't sound like the park is close at all! Oh, masks are required everywhere in the park at all times...except for the bears, wolves, deer, and skunks, of course.
and outdoor mask mandates.
Pretty ridiculous. Any mask mandate causes paradox M.
Even when we knew little about the virus,
We knew it was a variant of the Covid/SARS series, and that it would behave like any other of the series. Other than being unusually mild, it has.
it was pretty obvious that passing someone on the sidewalk or relaxing, socially distanced, in the same park as your neighbor wasn’t going to contribute significantly to community spread.
Really makes little difference. The problem is the fear mongering, not the virus itself.
Yet that didn’t stop cities from implementing outdoor mask mandates — or stop citizens from taking these mandates extremely seriously.
Again, paradox M...and unconstitutional.
Washington has had an outdoor mask mandate in place for nearly a year now, and while it makes an exception for "vigorous outdoor exercise" and "maintaining social distance of at least six feet from other people," you wouldn’t be able to tell by walking down the street.
You are referring to Washington DC, not the State of Washington.
As a D.C. resident, I have seen countless bikers in masks
I see 'em in Washington State too. They are hypochondriacs...and rather silly looking.
as well as clusters of Lululemon-wearing yoga observers, six feet apart in a park and fully masked.
Same as the bike riders, and even sillier looking.
Runners wear masks, gaggles of friends in parks wear masks. You will likely get dirty looks if you step outside of your apartment, even for a moment, for an unmasked breath of fresh air.
Frankly, I don't care if I get dirty looks from Democrats and their minions.
For people in D.C. and other metro areas across the U.S., outdoor mask-wearing isn’t about following the science.
Obviously, since there isn't any.
It’s a lifestyle, and it’s about signaling to others that they’re taking this pandemic seriously.
Bingo. It is virtue signaling. It is also hypochondria.
But it’s not 2020 anymore.
Covid19 started in 2019 in the news, hence the commonly used name. The actual name of this variant is SARS-CoV-2.
More than half of Americans are at least partially vaccinated.
True, for what good it does them.
The economy is opening back up.
Not in locked down areas.
The only signaling we should be doing now is signaling that we’re actually following the science, not following overzealous efforts to indicate our superiority.
There is no science involved here. Covid19 exists. That is not science. It is a variant of the Covid/SARS series. That is not science. Engineering specifications such as N95 or Medical Class 1 are not science. Mandating masks and vaccines are not science. Paradox M and paradox V are not science.
Last week, Slate ran an article concluding that "it’s about time for us to stop wearing masks outside." In the article, an infectious diseases physician explains how unlikely it is to get COVID-19 from passing someone on the street:
...deleted Holy Link...
Covid19 is an airborne virus. You can get infected WITHOUT passing ANYONE on any street!
 
I did define real
Lie. You cannot define a word with a void.
but you just keep asking anyway.
I ask again. Define 'real'.
So whats the point?
The point is your continue use of 'real' as a meaningless buzzword. You seem to have a real problem with English.
Note the difference between how was asked. Define your mom.
Pivot fallacy. Define 'real'. Define 'life'.
 
.
During a discussion on new measures being rolled out to halt the spread of the Omicron variant in schools, Calum Semple, Professor of Child Health and Outbreak Medicine at the University of Liverpool stressed it was vital that Britons “put to bed” the idea that COVID-19 is spread outdoors stressing it is indoors where the virus spreads.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1...n-omicron-school-closures-professor-semple-vn

Considering covid like any other respiratory virus is an airborne virus that is transferred from one person to the next as a result of human contact be it outside or inside. In particular, tRump's brainwashed cult followers are still dropping like covid flies as a result of those outdoor and indoor anti vax and anti-mask super spreader cult rallies. What type of professor is, and where did this person get their medical degree, a cracker jack box?
 
Both Washington and Washington DC (the reference you gave). They are not the same thing.
Pardon my pickiness, but us many folks here in the State of Washington do get kind of bent out of shape about that sort of thing. :D

You should change your name to Washington PC aka Pacific Coast.
 
Those are totaly polar opposite meanings. How not?
Apparently you don't know what 'opposite' means either.
A phrase having unrelated or polar opposite meanings simultaneously is absolutely equivocation fallacy.
Nope. It is not a fallacy for a word to have more than one meaning, or even more than one origin.
Simple. Some words originate from local slang, AND originate from, say, usage in Latin.
Getting tired of your shit stupid method of citing fallacies withoit showing basis.
Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself. That's what an inversion fallacy is.
Thats not how its done.
I do not need to explain what a fallacy is. Google is your friend. You don't get to declare "how it's done". You are not the king.
Yaknow fk you, define your mom.
Pivot fallacy. Evasion. Define 'real'. Define 'life.

You seem to be going well out of your way to avoid defining these two words, as you use them.

As far as I'm concerned, you apparently don't know English. Words and phrases have no meaning to you.
 
Considering covid like any other respiratory virus is an airborne virus that is transferred from one person to the next as a result of human contact be it outside or inside.
Nope. NO human contact required.
In particular, tRump's brainwashed cult followers are still dropping like covid flies
Covid19 isn't an insect. Covid19 has no politics.
as a result of those outdoor and indoor anti vax and anti-mask super spreader cult rallies.
Buzzword fallacy. Paradox V. Paradox M. Being irrational doesn't prove anything. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.
What type of professor is, and where did this person get their medical degree, a cracker jack box?
Incomplete sentence. Try again.
 
You should change your name to Washington PC aka Pacific Coast.

Heh. That's the trouble with such a great man. Everyone wants to name their streets, counties, cities, and States after him.

No, Washington State does NOT want to be associated with the SOTC in any way, or even with what's left of Oregon.

Go ahead and use 'Washington' to refer to Washington DC. Anyone there isn't aware of your meaning by now is pretty brain dead. :D
 
Nope. NO human contact required.

Covid19 isn't an insect. Covid19 has no politics.

Buzzword fallacy. Paradox V. Paradox M. Being irrational doesn't prove anything. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

Incomplete sentence. Try again.

Incomplete sentence? I believe a stated enough. Yet in your case, this would be an incomplete sentence and an incomplete thought as a moot point. Try again.
 
Reduced to just insults now, eh? Insult fallacy. Trolling. No argument presented.

Walk it like you talk it fagot. I crushed your whole argument and you just kept going further and further tangential. You also broke ad hom first. If you cant even be bothered to cite you basis when making fallacy claims, you're just an asshole faggot and total projectionist.
 
Back
Top