Cannot catch Covid outside says professor

[moon]

Viruses aren't living things, so they don't die.

.

The real facts are, besides your dictionary. Viruses have distinct apparatus that it opperates under some unknown circomstance or outright choice. Proof of life.

the debate of whether viruses are living or non-living continues. As the understanding of viruses continues to develop, scientists may eventually reach a final decision on this question.

https://askabiologist.asu.edu/questions/are-viruses-alive

You're a pair of mouthy twats.



Haw, haw......................................haw.

 

[moon]

If you’re outside kissing someone with COVID, you’re going to catch COVID.

Yeah. Even if you're breathing heavy


Haw, haw..............................haw.

 

[Blackcat13th]

You're a pair of mouthy twats.



Haw, haw......................................haw.

Sez slag

 

[moon]

" Slag " ? Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr



Haw, haw.................................haw

 

[Blackcat13th]

Slag
1. Unwanted byproduct of smelting steel
2. Unwanted elderly overused prostitute that hangs around red light districts resulting in lower patronage.

 

[moon]

Slag
1. Unwanted byproduct of smelting steel
2. Unwanted elderly overused prostitute that hangs around red light districts resulting in lower patronage.

Repetitious rant-ruffian.



Haw, haw......................haw.

 

[Jack]

If you’re outside kissing someone with COVID, you’re going to catch COVID.

You need to address that to Tommy.

 

[Blackcat13th]

Repetitious rant-ruffian.



Haw, haw......................haw.

How so? Slag.

 

[Blackcat13th]

Theres no guessing if anyone would catch covid outdoors. There's nothing that proves it dies instantly outdoors. It would be particularly unique if it did.

 

[Minister of Truth]

.
During a discussion on new measures being rolled out to halt the spread of the Omicron variant in schools, Calum Semple, Professor of Child Health and Outbreak Medicine at the University of Liverpool stressed it was vital that Britons “put to bed” the idea that COVID-19 is spread outdoors stressing it is indoors where the virus spreads.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1...n-omicron-school-closures-professor-semple-vn

Time for some more rioting, then.

 

[Into the Night]

Unproven

Proven. Viruses not not complete cells, and they have no ability to reproduce.

If they weren't living at all, how did the come to be in the first place?

How did the Universe come to be in the first place? Irrelevant question.

A book of definitions does not rule reality.

Random words. No apparent coherency.

You're attempting a reverse reification fallacy by stating an real thing like life does not exist because it doesn't well fit your abstract diction.

Fallacy fallacy. I never said life does not exist. Define 'real'.

Reality itself does not depend on a dictionary for it's existence.

Agreed. Define 'reality'.

The real facts are,

Buzzword fallacies. Define 'real'.

besides your dictionary.

I am not using a dictionary. Dictionaries do not define words. That is not their purpose.

Viruses have distinct apparatus that it opperates under some unknown circomstance or outright choice.

What 'apparatus'? What 'choice'? What 'circumstance'?

Proof of life.

Attempted proof by buzzword.

In addition to reality itself not depending on a dictionary for its existence.

It doesn't. Define 'real'. I am not using a dictionary.

A dictionary does not depend on reality for its existence either.

Define 'real'.

While there must be a book or data somewhere, it could be filled with completely irrelevant psycopathy.

Certainly. Define 'real'. You cannot use a dictionary, since dictionaries do not define any word.
After that, you can try to define 'life'.

 

[ExpressLane]

More people have died of COVID under Biden's watch. Where is his picture?

 

[Into the Night]

And frankly, a dictionary verifiably is filled with psychopathy.

A dictionary is a book. It is not psychopathic. It has no personality at all.

Every single word is a meaningless combination of squiggly lines that were all created by a collectivist psychosis in that they ever had any meaning at all.

Writing isn't psychosis.

They only exist because we imagine they exist.

?A->A. Proof of identity. It exists.

Every single word is an individual argumentum ad populum fallacy.

Fallacy fallacy. Words are not defined by vote.

Beyond that, things are said to die that had never lived in the first place such as an engine.

In a colloquial way, true. An engine, of course, is not a living thing.

My claim was accurate while your counter claim was fundamentally baseless.

You claim is now a paradox.
1) The definition of life is absolute.
2) The definition of life is colloquial.

Which is it, dude?


Dictionaries do not define any word. I am not using a dictionary.

Define 'real'. Define 'life'. Let's see your philosophy on these definitions.

 

[Into the Night]

If you’re outside kissing someone with COVID, you’re going to catch COVID.

Not necessarily.

 

[Blackcat13th]

Proven. Viruses not not complete cells, and they have no ability to reproduce.

Means nothing. Very obviously they can still be alive. They have a structure that sorrounds and protects their internal dna insertion structures. Whether or not you call it a cell wall or a polka dotted marmoset has no bearing whether it exists or not.

How did the Universe come to be in the first place? Irrelevant question.

False equivalency. A virus is nothing like the universe as a whole.

Random words. No apparent coherency.

Thats the way your counterpoint looks, yes.

Fallacy fallacy. I never said life does not exist. Define 'real'.

you said it does not exist in the context of a virus. Red herring fallacy.

Agreed. Define 'reality'.

That which exists independently of belief

Buzzword fallacies. Define 'real'.

Repeated attemps to delegitimize reality itself. Why should you need to ask me?

I am not using a dictionary. Dictionaries do not define words. That is not their purpose.

pure unadulterated psycopathy.

What 'apparatus'? What 'choice'? What 'circumstance'?

red herring fallacy.

Attempted proof by buzzword.

Rhetoric

It doesn't. Define 'real'. I am not using a dictionary.

your dictionary sux.

Define 'real'.

repetitious rhetoric

Certainly. Define 'real'. You cannot use a dictionary, since dictionaries do not define any word.

psycopathy, i can clearly do whatever i please.

After that, you can try to define 'life'.

If you're trying to prove something has no life then how can you say i need to prove the existence of life itself?

 

[Celticguy]

Who knew?

the left who routinely noted that the BLM/Antifa criminals were not spreading during their passion plays.

 

[cancel2 2022]

Who knew?

A lot of people, so if you knew then why did you keep it to yourself?

 

[cancel2 2022]

More people have died of COVID under Biden's watch. Where is his picture?

You know why, he's an arsehole.

 

[Blackcat13th]

A dictionary is a book. It is not psychopathic. It has no personality at all.

psucopathy doesnt relate to personality and frankly, books do definitly have personality if you can get to the intended meaning they present. Everything in any and every book is complete psycopathy. The meanings it portrays exist independently of the meanings it attempts to portray. How could that not be a disconnection to reality and psychosis itself?

Writing isn't psychosis.

thats exactly what it is. How could either of us be right or wrong if it were otherwise?

?A->A. Proof of identity. It exists.

a squiggle, that's all

Fallacy fallacy. Words are not defined by vote.

thats exactly what they're defined by.

In a colloquial way, true. An engine, of course, is not a living thing.

pretty well everyone would say their car died. My usage was perfectly well suitable

You claim is now a paradox.
1) The definition of life is absolute.
2) The definition of life is colloquial.

False dilemma fallacy. Theres no reason it couldn't be both.

Dictionaries do not define any word. I am not using a dictionary.

if words are defined by their usage then how is a dictionary not a citable usage?

Define 'real'. Define 'life'. Let's see your philosophy on these definitions.

challenge declined. Not worth the effort. Why delve into the ontology when even the most basic concepts require whole encyclopedias?

 

[AProudLefty]

A lot of people, so if you knew then why did you keep it to yourself?

So you never had a common sense?