Cancer Deaths Are Now Surging Among Covid-Boosted

Facts are not a proof, anchovies. He is posting stuff to you, which already indicates he has never gargled bleach. He's still alive.
We know, we know, Rudi told us, “the truth ain’t the truth,” and libraries had to spend all that time separating fiction from Dewey’s decimal system for nothing
 
Search Assist

Cancer and inflammation are closely linked, as chronic inflammation can increase the risk of developing various types of cancer. Inflammation may promote tumor growth and spread by creating an environment that supports cancer cell proliferation and survival. cancercenter.com Wikipedia

The Relationship Between Cancer and Inflammation​

Understanding Inflammation​

Inflammation is a natural response of the immune system to injury or infection. It involves the release of white blood cells and chemicals to help heal damaged tissues. However, when inflammation becomes chronic, it can lead to various health issues, including cancer.

Inflammation as a Cancer Risk Factor​

Chronic inflammation is linked to the development and progression of cancer. It is estimated that 15% to 20% of cancer-related deaths are associated with inflammation. This prolonged inflammatory state can damage healthy cells and create an environment conducive to tumor growth.

Mechanisms of Inflammation in Cancer​

  • Tumor Promotion: Inflammatory processes can stimulate the growth of blood vessels that supply tumors with nutrients and oxygen.
  • Genetic Damage: Chronic inflammation may lead to mutations in DNA, contributing to cancer development.
  • Immune Evasion: Tumors can exploit the inflammatory environment to evade immune detection, allowing them to grow and spread.

Therapeutic Opportunities​

Research is ongoing to explore anti-inflammatory therapies as potential cancer treatments. Some studies suggest that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), like aspirin, may reduce the risk of certain cancers, particularly colorectal cancer.

Conclusion​

The interplay between cancer and inflammation is complex. While inflammation is essential for healing, its chronic form can significantly increase cancer risk. Understanding this relationship opens avenues for new treatment strategies targeting inflammation in cancer therapy.
Wikipedia BioMed Central
Ah. You've decided to read from Wikipedia again. False authority fallacy.
 

Renowned Oncologist Sounds Alarm: Cancer Deaths Are Now Surging Among Covid-Boosted​

Dr. Angus Dalgleish, a world-renowned oncologist and vaccine researcher, has issued a chilling warning that the Covid mRNA “booster” program may have been one of the greatest medical missteps in modern history.

Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s University of London, is sounding the alarm over the surging numbers of cancer deaths currently being recorded among those who received the so-called “boosters.”

In a new statement, Dalgleish warns that cancer cases and related deaths are now skyrocketing among those who received the injections.

The highly respected oncologist explains that the mRNA shots “suppress the immune system” and “drive” the surging cancer cases.

Lots of words... lots of claims....no data to support the claim.

He might as well have said "There's an increase in herpes among people who eat Fruit Loops".
 
Lots of words... lots of claims....no data to support the claim.

He might as well have said "There's an increase in herpes among people who eat Fruit Loops".
inflammation causes cancer.

the spike protein injection keeps overstimulating the immune system, resulting in continual inflammation.

it's very simple.

you're just a big pharma shill Nazi freak.
 
inflammation causes cancer.

the spike protein injection keeps overstimulating the immune system, resulting in continual inflammation.

it's very simple.

you're just a big pharma shill Nazi freak.
Again, absolutely nothing to support his claim. A real doctor... a responsible doctor....studies that data and then draws conclusions.

This is standard, conspiracy theory, nutter butter nonsense.
 
Articles, not article, and your site is bogus
Correction: Your "debunking" ARTICLES seem to rely on assertions and what "could become" .... which does not change the facts of cases that are happening each quarter (or year).

And your opinion of my linked source is worthless:

ResearchGate – Bias and Credibility​

These sources consist of legitimate science or are evidence-based through the use of credible scientific sourcing. Legitimate science follows the scientific method, is unbiased, and does not use emotional words. These sources also respect the consensus of experts in the given scientific field and strive to publish peer-reviewed science. Some sources in this category may have a slight political bias but adhere to scientific principles.

www.mediabiasfactcheck.com/researchgate/
 
The problem with debating this issue is that you have two armed camps .... "Maga" and "leftists" (terminology is generalized) ... that are in total agreement with regards to true scientific evidence and historical facts regarding Fauci's leadership. But those invested in such extremes would rather shoot themselves in the foot than admit to such.
 
Back
Top