Can you spare this guy a dime?

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
That you actually think your snide remarks are "civil" speaks volumes of the lack of intelligence on your part, Voltaire. If you can't take it, don't dish it out.

As for proof of O'Keefe's lies

http://mediamatters.org/research/201006010001


http://mediamatters.org/research/201009290035


Now all YOU have to do is factually disprove the evidence Voltaire...and just saying "it isn't true" or denying it won't cut it.

OMG Media Matters?! Well paint me green and call me gumby.

Translation: our neocon blowhard Voltaire cannot logically or factually disprove the evidenc that is presented in the links. Small wonder the little fool boasts about sending O'Keefe some dollars....proving P.T. Barnum was correct. Carry on.
 
O'Keefe is very much "out-come oriented",,,,,(the ends justify the means)....you would think liberals would like that....lying and spinning to further their goals is normal operating procedure for them....:lol:

O'Keefe depends upon drunken assholes like YOU Bravo, to send him money despite being indicted for criminal activity and proven to be a fraud on several accounts.

But do keep laughing, my intellectually impotent Bravo....because YOU are indeed a clown.

As for proof of O'Keefe's lies

http://mediamatters.org/research/201006010001


http://mediamatters.org/research/201009290035

Notice folks, that the neocon peanut gallery won't dare touch the content of these links, but parrot the mantra that the source is unreliable. Easy to say, but tough to prove for the likes of Bravo, Voltaire, Webbway, Rbter, Ice Dancer.
 
Which proves my point as to your partisan hackery, Rbter. You and Voltaire share the same insipidly stubborn defense/support with regards to the neocon pundits and politicos less than honest actions. At least Voltaire is a little more honest about than you, Rbter...but then intellectual honesty shouldn't be expected from a person who uses a spent condom as an avatar. Carry on.

Voltaire and I share the same opinion of your senseless attacks. As far as I'm aware, that's about all we share.

What should be inferred by interpreting an internet avatar? Is that how you arrive at your conclusions?
 
Translation: our neocon blowhard Voltaire cannot logically or factually disprove the evidenc that is presented in the links. Small wonder the little fool boasts about sending O'Keefe some dollars....proving P.T. Barnum was correct. Carry on.
Mediamatters isn't proof of anything...like the DailyKOS and Huffington, all they promote is left-wing propaganda we normally call bullshit.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Which proves my point as to your partisan hackery, Rbter. You and Voltaire share the same insipidly stubborn defense/support with regards to the neocon pundits and politicos less than honest actions. At least Voltaire is a little more honest about than you, Rbter...but then intellectual honesty shouldn't be expected from a person who uses a spent condom as an avatar. Carry on.

Voltaire and I share the same opinion of your senseless attacks. As far as I'm aware, that's about all we share.

Spare me this lame dodge about "senseless attacks". I posted a bonafide FACT(s) about O'Keefe and speculated as to whether people would actually give that joker money. Voltaire stated that he would consider it, which IMHO proves out P.T. Barnum's assessment of mankind. YOU, Rbter, just avoided the FACTS about O'Keefe and just parroted some previous BS of yours that was discussed in another thread, and of which I made short work of on Post #16 here. At least Voltaire is a little more honest in this discussion than you.

What should be inferred by interpreting an internet avatar? Is that how you arrive at your conclusions?

Get an nearby adult you trust to explain it to you, as I tire of your lame dodges, Rbter. It's obvious that Rbter just doesn't have the intellectual honesty to discuss the evidence regarding O'Keefe, folks. Let's watch him dance the neocon dodge step.
 
O'Keefe depends upon drunken assholes like YOU Bravo, to send him money despite being indicted for criminal activity and proven to be a fraud on several accounts.

I'm drunk on that superior feeling I get from reading you childish playground rants....do you stamp you feet while typing that crap???

indicted for criminal activity ???
a single misdemeanor count of entering a federal building under false pretenses.....what a lying asshole you are.....
Yes Clarabell, you do make me chuckle a bit....even sober....
:lmao:

But do keep laughing, my intellectually impotent Bravo....because YOU are indeed a clown.

As for proof of O'Keefe's lies

http://mediamatters.org/research/201006010001


http://mediamatters.org/research/201009290035

Notice folks, that the neocon peanut gallery won't dare touch the content of these links, but parrot the mantra that the source is unreliable. Easy to say, but tough to prove for the likes of Bravo, Voltaire, Webbway, Rbter, Ice Dancer.

You should take your show on the road...."The PrickHick From New York".....hahaha....:palm:
 
Back
Top