Who spends time thinking women can do everything a man can do? Better yet, who spends thinking other people think women can do everything a man can do? Did you think someone was going to jump in and argue women can absolutely do everything a man can do?
Can we dispense with the nonsense that women can do anything men can do already?
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
SmarterthanYou
rebel
so you're lacking common sense. got it. Hey, dufus, women as a whole are physically inferior to men as a whole. Anyone not understanding that is ignorant
QP!
Verified User
It reminds me of men crying when they see a woman action star in a movie who kicks butt as 'unrealistic', while they cheer on manlets like Tom Cruise or Matt Damon or Jason Statham beating up waves of hulking men.
The latter is ok to them as it appeals to a more average mans ego of 'despite your lack of size and physical prowess... you too can beat up giant guys', and many gullible guys eat it up while crying about the women doing the same.
The latter is ok to them as it appeals to a more average mans ego of 'despite your lack of size and physical prowess... you too can beat up giant guys', and many gullible guys eat it up while crying about the women doing the same.
QP!
Verified User
90% of men are physically inferior to the other 10% of men who are athletic. Anyone not understanding that is ignorant.
QP!
Verified User
Not totally accurate. Yes at one point PoC and women would have been banned from 'men's sports' in certain countries, but not all. But Mens Sports have, for the most part, been an open league where if any women could make the cut, they would be allowed to compete.
Womens sport, in most countries evolved to give women a place to compete with peers based on their biological sex, in an attempt to give them a fair playing field.
The above is the reason why i have always said that the Trans Woman debate entirely misses the point. Had those that original created 'Womans Sport' known that at a point in the future the word 'Woman' would be isolated to gender and not biological sex, then the original league creation would have been defined by a term for biological sex as that was ALWAYS the division they intended.
Which means those on the left trying to argue trans women should get to compete versus biological women, as they too are 'women' are trying to take a semantic advantage to get them in when that was NEVER the intent of the leagues creation.
I am a proud lefty but this debate is one too many lefties get wrong.
Are you confused?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you should probably get a good look at todays gender studies classes across the US.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
someone is and it's certainly not me.
Yeah but your kind of "women" have penises.
Confused people rarely know they are confused.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
and apparently are unable to answer simple questions, like the one I posed.
Really? Do you have a link. I have seen video of a female place kicker on a boys high school football team. If women were in general on the same competitive level we would have seen trans biological females competing with the boys teams.
QP!
Verified User
Because in all these instances where the reference is 'men' they are using the top 10% of men as if that speaks to all men, when the vast majority of 'men' would fail the test of measuring up to the top ones they use to compare women too.
Most 'men' compared to the top men, cannot do what those men do. And thus most women will not be able to also.
QP!
Verified User
lets get to what is important.
Most girls are now dominating or greatly closing the gap in almost all academic ranks to the point where it is being called a crisis as young men cannot compete are being left behind in almost all areas of education including ones prior thought to be very male centric.
So while you idiots want to celebrate that ~10% of males are estimated to be able to lift their body weight while it is maybe 0.5% of women, i think the women will take the win of getting better education and better jobs and making more money and not needing gov't to try and 'save the boys ...because they cannot compete'.
FLOL
SmarterthanYou
rebel
it's still an irrelevant comparison...............the percentage of women who are stronger than 90% of men is ridiculously small. for example, the swedish womens soccer team losing to a team of 15 year old boys.............or a team of average men beating a professional womens soccer team. There are jobs out there so physically demanding that nearly all women can't, or won't, do them. There is a reason why most women STILL do the same jobs that most women did before the sexual revolution.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
You don’t know hat is in those classes, your just building off of what others has told you what is in the classes, and women studies has been around since the @“60’s
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I do know what is in those classes because I have a niece who takes those classes and regularly tries to debate me on what she's learned.