Can "Fox" Be Followed By "News"?

Mike said:
When I think about traditional journalism - pure established facts, presentation of cause and effect, sequence of events and cohesive conclusion-making come to mind.

Granted, we are not living in the past. But at the very least some semblance of integrity should be drawn out of a "News" channel.

Now, I've long lost hope of people lifting their Trump tinted glasses, trying to critically think for themselves, basing their thought-processes on undisputed facts on the ground (i.e. "We did see him on stage prior to the Jan 6 riots, saying what he was saying", "He did stipulate he would not be accepting the results, if he were ever to lose the elections" just to name a few), but - post-Dominion-Voting-Systems debacle, a sane, rational human being, with a chunk of brain between their ears would surely come to realize they've been regurgitating on unprecedented manure-for-truth hyperbole, that's had nothing to do with empirical facts on the ground.

So, as a bystander, what do I make of it - emotion blinds, needing to feel a part of a social group blinds, being protected by like-minded peers blinds.

Is it not the case? Am I the blind man here?
Click to expand...

When CNN and MSNBC start dealing in "...pure established facts, presentation of cause and effect, sequence of events and cohesive conclusion-making..." get back to us. Until then stfu
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Yes, it makes perfect sense to ignore all the *other* Reichwing sources, some of which are far worse than Fox. If you don't bring them up, you can pretend that "libtards" have access to far more "liberal media" sources than Reichwingers. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

I get it I ignore you leftist twats because you're retarded.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I can't get any of those on my cable.......you must have a really huuuge provider.......but no, I was referring to MSNBC, CNN, NPR, all your favorite flavors of menudo......
Click to expand...

I have Newsmax and it is informative but a bit boring.

FOX has the most interesting and informative shows, especially "The Five" and "Outnumbered" and most of the prime-time shows.

Where did Mikey go? off to watch CNN or MSNBC along with their other 12 viewers (combined).
 
Last edited:
this thread inspired me to look and I discovered a Newsmax Roku channel........now I will get an opportunity to experience it for the first time......my thanks to ThatOldWoman....
 
Mike said:
When I think about traditional journalism - pure established facts, presentation of cause and effect, sequence of events and cohesive conclusion-making come to mind.

Granted, we are not living in the past. But at the very least some semblance of integrity should be drawn out of a "News" channel.

Now, I've long lost hope of people lifting their Trump tinted glasses, trying to critically think for themselves, basing their thought-processes on undisputed facts on the ground (i.e. "We did see him on stage prior to the Jan 6 riots, saying what he was saying", "He did stipulate he would not be accepting the results, if he were ever to lose the elections" just to name a few), but - post-Dominion-Voting-Systems debacle, a sane, rational human being, with a chunk of brain between their ears would surely come to realize they've been regurgitating on unprecedented manure-for-truth hyperbole, that's had nothing to do with empirical facts on the ground.

So, as a bystander, what do I make of it - emotion blinds, needing to feel a part of a social group blinds, being protected by like-minded peers blinds.

Is it not the case? Am I the blind man here?
Click to expand...


The democrat Reich alone IS the truth. If the Reich, through their propaganda outlets of CNN or MSNBCCP declare that ice is hot, you will heat your trailer with ice and cuddle up to warmth it gives you. Anything that contradicts the Reich is a lie. Sieg Heil - Uber Alles democrat.

Fox News must be shut down and all those who are associated with it executed. Our ministry of Truth will decide what serves the Reich and what is a lie. Heil Biden.
 
martin said:
The post below yours from Stone is an example of someone who is blind here, a link to a National Review article attacking the newsworthy-ness of MSNBC. The post is meant as a whataboutism. It's confirmation of your argument instead.
MSNBC is an opinion channel. Doesn't present itself as "News". Does not have half hour segments advertised as news.
Click to expand...

Welol, you're a fucking liar.

[FONT=DDG_ProximaNova][h=2]MSNBC News - Breaking News and News Today | Latest News[/h][/FONT]
[FONT=DDG_ProximaNova][COLOR=var(--theme-col-txt-snippet)]MSNBC breaking news and the latest news for today. Get daily news from local news reporters and world news updates with live audio & video from our team.

Hey, you're a democrat - Truth is the Reich.[/COLOR]
[/FONT]
 
Mike said:
When I think about traditional journalism - pure established facts, presentation of cause and effect, sequence of events and cohesive conclusion-making come to mind.

Granted, we are not living in the past. But at the very least some semblance of integrity should be drawn out of a "News" channel.

Now, I've long lost hope of people lifting their Trump tinted glasses, trying to critically think for themselves, basing their thought-processes on undisputed facts on the ground (i.e. "We did see him on stage prior to the Jan 6 riots, saying what he was saying", "He did stipulate he would not be accepting the results, if he were ever to lose the elections" just to name a few), but - post-Dominion-Voting-Systems debacle, a sane, rational human being, with a chunk of brain between their ears would surely come to realize they've been regurgitating on unprecedented manure-for-truth hyperbole, that's had nothing to do with empirical facts on the ground.

So, as a bystander, what do I make of it - emotion blinds, needing to feel a part of a social group blinds, being protected by like-minded peers blinds.

Is it not the case? Am I the blind man here?
Click to expand...

Fox Newz is an infotainment network. Most of their shows are RW entertainment. An extreme form of Dennis Miller's humor. This is why even Fox admitted that no one should take Tucker Carlson seriously. The problem, of course, as JPP proves daily, is that there are plenty of fucking morons who do take RW entertainers seriously.

https://www.businessinsider.com/fox-news-karen-mcdougal-case-tucker-carlson-2020-9
Fox News won a court case by 'persuasively' arguing that no 'reasonable viewer' takes Tucker Carlson seriously
 
martin said:
FOX News is a political channel disguised as a news channel. It's claim as the number one news channel is misleading since its nightly news competition is comprised of three, not one, mainstream news channels: CBS, ABC and NBC. The claim is misleading also in that many viewers tune in for the network's political slant as well as, or instead of, news coverage.
Click to expand...

Are you an idiot, or just lying?

FNC is compared to other CABLE NEWS - that is CNN, MSNBCCP, OANN, and Newsmax. It is NOT compared to "broadcast" news.
 
Earl said:
I have not followed the Dominion-Voting-Systems case but I assume that FOX aired something that they could not prove in court.

That does not mean that it wasn’t true…they just could not prove it in court.
Click to expand...

I have no idea how one could've missed it, but I'll be happy to fill you in.

Fox had been rampantly going on and on about the Dominion-Voting-Systems' misleading "results" casting aspersions over their voting analysis practices. When the Dominion-Voting-Systems took them to court, loads of voice-recordings and texting were revealed. It turned out their reporters and onscreen "talent" had known all along this whole thing was a sham, mountains of lies, planets of deceit - the recordings revealed they had been spitting out lies onscreen while telling each other the exact opposite offscreen, disputing onscreen "truths". Not only that, they were putting people down - folks that came on air, spewing ridiculous lies, Fox people were acknowledging the lies, while spraying them all around for ratings.

In the end, Fox was caught lying in broad day light for fear of losing ratings. They settled out of court for a hefty sum of $1.6 billion.

And still - people blindly follow them, as if they were the gospel.

We're all humans, but why do these people CHOOSE to have their emotional outlet blind them into submissive decay of the mind??
 
Mike said:
When I think about traditional journalism - pure established facts, presentation of cause and effect, sequence of events and cohesive conclusion-making come to mind.

Granted, we are not living in the past. But at the very least some semblance of integrity should be drawn out of a "News" channel.

Now, I've long lost hope of people lifting their Trump tinted glasses, trying to critically think for themselves, basing their thought-processes on undisputed facts on the ground (i.e. "We did see him on stage prior to the Jan 6 riots, saying what he was saying", "He did stipulate he would not be accepting the results, if he were ever to lose the elections" just to name a few), but - post-Dominion-Voting-Systems debacle, a sane, rational human being, with a chunk of brain between their ears would surely come to realize they've been regurgitating on unprecedented manure-for-truth hyperbole, that's had nothing to do with empirical facts on the ground.

So, as a bystander, what do I make of it - emotion blinds, needing to feel a part of a social group blinds, being protected by like-minded peers blinds.

Is it not the case? Am I the blind man here?
Click to expand...
Yes
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
By "all the others," do you mean Newsmax, OANN, Breitbart, Daily Stormer, Gateway Pundit, Infowars, et al? BTW, it is spelled "propaganda." lol
Click to expand...

As always, you're lying.

Breitbart has no cable presence.

The "daily stormer" is a myth created by Nazi democrats based on a long defunct MESSAGE BOARD "Storm Front"

Gateway Pundit has no cable presence.

Infowars has no cable presence.

It's call "lying through your fucking teeth," and it's literally all you do.
 
Mike said:
I have no idea how one could've missed it, but I'll be happy to fill you in.

Fox had been rampantly going on and on about the Dominion-Voting-Systems' misleading "results" casting aspersions over their voting analysis practices. When the Dominion-Voting-Systems took them to court, loads of voice-recordings and texting were revealed. It turned out their reporters and onscreen "talent" had known all along this whole thing was a sham, mountains of lies, planets of deceit - the recordings revealed they had been spitting out lies onscreen while telling each other the exact opposite offscreen, disputing onscreen "truths". Not only that, they were putting people down - folks that came on air, spewing ridiculous lies, Fox people were acknowledging the lies, while spraying them all around for ratings.

In the end, Fox was caught lying in broad day light for fear of losing ratings. They settled out of court for a hefty sum of $1.6 billion.

And still - people blindly follow them, as if they were the gospel.

We're all humans, but why do these people CHOOSE to have their emotional outlet blind them into submissive decay of the mind??
Click to expand...
Have you listened to CNN or MSNBS lately?
 
Earl said:
I have Newsmax and it is informative but a bit boring.

FOX has the most interesting and informative shows, especially "The Five" and "Outnumbered" and most of the prime-time shows.

Where did Mikey go? off to watch CNN or MSNBC along with their other 12 viewers (combined).
Click to expand...

You said it yourself - you follow the "interesting" "news". The others are "boring", right?

Fox is known for splashy headlines, vibrant, screaming chyrons, loud and vocal proclamations and unbridled tabloid-esque, gawdy coloring. Now, after the Dominion-Voting-Systems debacle, they're also known for LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH.

And still - they have a herd of followers who can't stop gawking at their "interesting" screen, allowing Fox to replace critical thinking with loud, boisterous proclamations of mendacious gum-flapping.
 
ExpressLane said:
Have you listened to CNN or MSNBS lately?
Click to expand...

CNN got rid of the LW bomb thrower Don Lemon and has turned more toward evening special reports and documentaries. I don't watch to evening or late night Fox since they are like RW Don Lemons. I never watch MSNBC. TBH, while I record some of CNN's evening specials, mostly I only watch the day news and watch movies or series at night.
 
Mike said:
You said it yourself - you follow the "interesting" "news". The others are "boring", right?

Fox is known for splashy headlines, vibrant, screaming chyrons, loud and vocal proclamations and unbridled tabloid-esque, gawdy coloring. Now, after the Dominion-Voting-Systems debacle, they're also known for LYING THROUGH THEIR TEETH.

And still - they have a herd of followers who can't stop gawking at their "interesting" screen, allowing Fox to replace critical thinking with loud, boisterous proclamations of mendacious gum-flapping.
Click to expand...
CNN and MSNBS pushed Russian collusion for TWO years and it was false.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top