California’s economic situation!

Superfreak said:
The non-sequitur was when she and I were talking about who controlled the two houses and you in turn pointed out that you were able to discern that some of the years in the range were indeed in the range and that the economy was supposedly better with super majorities.
Click to expand...

And that's a non-sequitur, how?


Superfreak said:
Which had NOTHING to do with WHO CONTROLLED THE CA Senate and House. NOTHING. which is a non-sequitur
Click to expand...

Ummm...talking about Democrats controlling legislature for the last 5 years isn't talking about Democrats controlling the legislature?

Language isn't your friend.
 
Superfreak said:
Yes, it is. When discussing WHO controlled the CA Senate and House under Arnold.
Click to expand...

And you were the one who broadened it out when you brought up that Democrats controlled the CA legislature for 12 years between the period of 1992-2017.

Unless you're now going to say you aren't you, and you didn't write this:

Superfreak said:
https://ballotpedia.org/Party_control_of_California_state_government]

yes... you should actually try it.

California Party Control: 1992-2017
12 years of Democratic trifectas • No Republican trifectas
Click to expand...

So you entered that date range into the debate.

I picked up on that and pointed out that of those 12 years between 1993 and 2017, that Democrats have had Supermajority control for the last 5 years.

So it was wholly within the context of what you posted.

So can you apologize now, so we can move on?
 
I have known super duper and wack for well over a decade


they are both trash as human beings

lying and ignoring facts is abut all these dickweasels do
 
LV426 said:
And you were the one who broadened it out when you brought up that Democrats controlled the CA legislature for 12 years between the period of 1992-2017.

Unless you're now going to say you aren't you, and you didn't write this:



So you entered that date range into the debate.

I picked up on that and pointed out that of those 12 years between 1993 and 2017, that Democrats have had Supermajority control for the last 5 years.

So it was wholly within the context of what you posted.

So can you apologize now, so we can move on?
Click to expand...

They lost the supermajority awhile back because three people got charged with crimes or me too'. You're trying to talk about a state you're not familiar with
 
LV426 said:
And that's a non-sequitur, how?
Click to expand...

It had NOTHING to do with whether it was Dems or Reps that controlled the House. But again... very bright of you to catch on to the fact that years within a range are indeed within a range.[/quote]




Ummm...talking about Democrats controlling legislature for the last 5 years isn't talking about Democrats controlling the legislature?

Language isn't your friend.
Click to expand...

Again moron... if you bothered paying attention to why I posted it... the point was who controlled the legislature under ARNOLD. Not the past five years. So again, either you aren't paying attention or you are an idiot. You tell us which it is.
 
LV426 said:
And you were the one who broadened it out when you brought up that Democrats controlled the CA legislature for 12 years between the period of 1992-2017.

Unless you're now going to say you aren't you, and you didn't write this:



So you entered that date range into the debate.

I picked up on that and pointed out that of those 12 years between 1993 and 2017, that Democrats have had Supermajority control for the last 5 years.

So it was wholly within the context of what you posted.

So can you apologize now, so we can move on?
Click to expand...

You are a fucking moron. Her comment was on who controlled it under ARNOLD.

The site showed that the Republicans had NO trifectas. It showed that over that span the Dems had 12. It completely refuted her point. you jumping onto anything other than who controlled it under someone other than Arnold is indeed a non-sequitur. Again, you pointing out that years in a range are in the range is not adding anything. It is showing how ignorant you are.
 
LV426 said:
It was literally about what party controlled the House and when.
Click to expand...

Again you fucking dolt. Her comment was who controlled the house and senate when ARNOLD was in office. You then tried to take it off onto another time frame. you fucking moron.
 
the link of you saying there will be no crash when I predicted the crash is right in my signature super duper


you are never correct in retrospect

why should ANYONE listen to your dumb fucking ass
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top