California raising taxes on guns and ammunition

[domer76]

It's not 10% it's an additional 10%.

How much does the average handgun cost? Ammo or magazine? Maybe for some people that does make it impossible for them to exercise their right to gun ownership. If a person has a right should they be able to exercise their right if they choose? Should the qualifications to any right be related to wealth as the Supreme Court stated about voting in their Harper v Virginia State Board of Elections decision?

What the fuck did I just say? 10%, idiot.

The difference between $500 and $550.

“Maybe for some people”? Is that really the best you have?

Harper was a poll tax. Unconstitutional. Just as I already told you dumbfucks.

Taxes on guns, a commercial transaction, are legal. When they are deemed unconstitutional, feel free to ket us know.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Have you always been this stupid or did you experience a traumatic brain injury?

stop deflecting and answer the question. How long have you been a closet racist? Why do you want firearms priced out of the budgets of blacks and hispanics? Do you want them defenseless in the face of your KKK buddies?

 

[domer76]

stop deflecting and answer the question. How long have you been a closet racist? Why do you want firearms priced out of the budgets of blacks and hispanics? Do you want them defenseless in the face of your KKK buddies?

Question for the idiots on this forum. Which answer is correct?

1) Poll taxes are legal.
2) Gun taxes are legal.

Just to make sure you ignorant fucks get it right, you get TWO GUESSES!

 

[Yakuda]

What the fuck did I just say? 10%, idiot.

The difference between $500 and $550.

“Maybe for some people”? Is that really the best you have?

Harper was a poll tax. Unconstitutional. Just as I already told you dumbfucks.

Taxes on guns, a commercial transaction, are legal. When they are deemed unconstitutional, feel free to ket us know.

You keel forgetting you're a retarded cunt but you're a retarded cunt so....

It's amazing how much of a retarded cunt you actually are.

You didnt read the decision did you? Oh thats right you're a retarded cunt. It said "Voter qualifications have no relation to wealth". Why then should wealth have any relation to any right? Oh right AGAIN you dont know because you're a retarded cunt.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

”California governor signs law raising taxes on guns and ammunition to pay for school safety”

“California will double the taxes on guns and ammunition and use the money to pay for more security at public schools and various violence prevention programs under a new law Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Tuesday.”

“The federal government already taxes the sale of guns and ammunition at either 10% or 11%, depending on the type of gun. The law Newsom signed adds another 11% tax on top of that — making it the only state with its own tax on guns and ammunition”

“California has some of the lowest gun death rates in the country, ranking 43rd out of 50 states with 9 deaths for every 100,000 people”

https://apnews.com/article/californ...chool-safety-0870a673a3d4e85c78466897cfd7ff6f

Good move, however compromised since any gun hugger can drive to a neighboring State, but it is a step in the right direction

It's NOT a good move at all from my view.

Taxation should never be used to influence behavior,
whether it's firearms ownership, smoking, gambling, or anything else.

Taxes should be levied appropriately
to raise revenue for governmental functions.

The most progressive tax is a graduated federal tax on income, period,
and in my model, that would be used to fund almost everything.

 

[domer76]

You keel forgetting you're a retarded cunt but you're a retarded cunt so....

It's amazing how much of a retarded cunt you actually are.

You didnt read the decision did you? Oh thats right you're a retarded cunt. It said "Voter qualifications have no relation to wealth". Why then should wealth have any relation to any right? Oh right AGAIN you dont know because you're a retarded cunt.

Let’s try again.

Question for the idiots on this forum. Which answer is correct?

1) Poll taxes are legal.
2) Gun taxes are legal.

Just to make sure you ignorant fucks get it right, you get TWO GUESSES!

 

[NiftyNiblick]

Let’s try again.

Question for the idiots on this forum. Which answer is correct?

1) Poll taxes are legal.
2) Gun taxes are legal.

Just to make sure you ignorant fucks get it right, you get TWO GUESSES!

No citizen with an IQ in the high two digits should get this quiz wrong.

The pertinent question is this:

Are we in actual agreement that every law on the books is a good idea?

Hint: we're not.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Question for the idiots on this forum. Which answer is correct?

1) Poll taxes are legal.
2) Gun taxes are legal.

Just to make sure you ignorant fucks get it right, you get TWO GUESSES!

I understand you need to continue avoiding the question, almost as if you don't want to face the unintended consequences of your wishes and desires. avoidance is the cowards way out.

 

[Yakuda]

Let’s try again.

Question for the idiots on this forum. Which answer is correct?

1) Poll taxes are legal.
2) Gun taxes are legal.

Just to make sure you ignorant fucks get it right, you get TWO GUESSES!

Again cunt mouth poll taxes were considered unconstitutional because they made a relation between voting and wealth. Why should any right then have a relation to wealth including gun ownership? You're a whiny little bitch arent you? Too much donkey dick on your mind huh?

 

[domer76]

No citizen with an IQ in the high two digits should get this quiz wrong.

The pertinent question is this:

Are we in actual agreement that every law on the books is a good idea?

Hint: we're not.

Of course not. Citizens United was not a very good decision, but, like it or not, it’s the law. One can choose to obey that law or not.

 

[domer76]

I understand you need to continue avoiding the question, almost as if you don't want to face the unintended consequences of your wishes and desires. avoidance is the cowards way out.

LOL

You still failed after two guesses. How is that even possible?

 

[domer76]

Again cunt mouth poll taxes were considered unconstitutional because they made a relation between voting and wealth. Why should any right then have a relation to wealth including gun ownership? You're a whiny little bitch arent you? Too much donkey dick on your mind huh?

Here’s Scalia’s majority opinion in Heller. See if you can find a literate 10 year old to explain it to you.

Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms," he added.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

LOL

You still failed after two guesses. How is that even possible?

you're not answering mine, do you think you're so special that everyone else needs to answer yours? I guess, like feminists, you avoid all accountability

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Here’s Scalia’s majority opinion in Heller. See if you can find a literate 10 year old to explain it to you.

Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms," he added.

It's hypocriticallly amusing to watch you hate filled fucksticks with a hard on for Scalia absolutely LOVE this opinion that you quote it so much...............

A true government power loving fuckfest of idiocy

 

[Yakuda]

Here’s Scalia’s majority opinion in Heller. See if you can find a literate 10 year old to explain it to you.

Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms," he added.

Again you're a retarded cunt so you can't help it. This isn't about the right of the govt to tax commerce it's about the govt imposing an undue burden on law abiding citizens to exercise they right to gun ownership. AGAIN Harper v VA board of elections says religion to wealth should nit be a qualification to vote why should it be to osn a gun? Answer the question you retarded cunt. Oh right AGAIN you're a retarded cunt.

 

[domer76]

Again you're a retarded cunt so you can't help it. This isn't about the right of the govt to tax commerce it's about the govt imposing an undue burden on law abiding citizens to exercise they right to gun ownership. AGAIN Harper v VA board of elections says religion to wealth should nit be a qualification to vote why should it be to osn a gun? Answer the question you retarded cunt. Oh right AGAIN you're a retarded cunt.

Let’s repeat for the idiots.

Gun sales are a COMMERCIAL TRANSACTION. Get it? TRANSACTION. Your hero, Scalia, spelled it out. Clearly, or so I thought.

“Laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms” are legal and constitutional. You can push and push on Harper until your hemorrhoids burst, but it doesn’t change the facts. Guns and ammo are already legally taxed, dumbfuck. This is nothing more than an additional 10%.

 

[domer76]

It's hypocriticallly amusing to watch you hate filled fucksticks with a hard on for Scalia absolutely LOVE this opinion that you quote it so much...............

A true government power loving fuckfest of idiocy

The law, “vehicles cannot be necessary”. You can choose to obey it or not. You, however, rant on about the illegality of some, yet are too much a pussy to engage in any civil disobedience.

All hat, no cowboy.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The law, “vehicles cannot be necessary”. You can choose to obey it or not. You, however, rant on about the illegality of some, yet are too much a pussy to engage in any civil disobedience.

All hat, no cowboy.

ok dredd ROFL nice try on the attempt to deflect away from you and on to me, but i'm not buying it, racist. It's no different than you morons demanding vaccine mandates, despite the possibility of adverse affects........because you just don't fucking care about others. another liberal lie

 

[domer76]

ok dredd ROFL nice try on the attempt to deflect away from you and on to me, but i'm not buying it, racist. It's no different than you morons demanding vaccine mandates, despite the possibility of adverse affects........because you just don't fucking care about others. another liberal lie

Ah, the “possibility of adverse effects”. Pretty damn funny response in the context of gun ownership.