California lawmakers pass Sactuary State bill

God bless America said:
So you acknowledge that I did not use the term, "Sanctuary Cities". Good.

Now, let me draw your attention to the thread title, which begins with these two words: California lawmakers

BTW, the term "Sanctuary Cities" does not appear in the thread tile either, does it? :rofl2:
Click to expand...

I observe that you don't have a fucking clue about the concept of Sanctuary Cities nor are literate enough to read the thread title, which contains the term " Sanctuary", shitweasel, albeit misspelled by another one of you RW morons.

Poor little tardboy.
 
domer76 said:
I observe that you don't have a fucking clue about the concept of Sanctuary Cities nor are literate enough to read the thread title, which contains the term " Sanctuary", shitweasel, albeit misspelled by another one of you RW morons. Poor little tardboy.
Click to expand...

What you claim to "observe" isn't provable, is it?

BTW, isn't the thread about California lawmakers who passed a "sanctuary state" bill?

:rofl2:
 
God bless America said:
What you claim to "observe" isn't provable, is it?

BTW, isn't the thread about California lawmakers who passed a "sanctuary state" bill?

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

It is both sad and amusing to watch the last place finisher in the Special Olympics.

What part of 'sanctuary' did you fail to understand, halfwit?
 
I Love America said:
It is interesting the position lefties take on things.

You have Arizona passing a law stating it will comply with Federal Law and the lefties shit their pants
You have Commifornia passing a law defying federal law and the lefties cheer the lawlessness

Anyone see the contradiction here? This is why leftists must be defeated. They are in for a surprise that they don't see coming. I shan't disclose it here, but it will only take a couple more election cycles and when it happens look the fuck out. The American people WILL take this country back and we won't need Mitch McCuntell and Paul Ryan to do it
Click to expand...

They don't just shit their pants, they sue! Tie up the courts, protest, and now; beat and threaten people.

They are relentless in trying to transform/ruin the country and create a lawless anarcho-communist state.
 
God bless America said:
So you acknowledge that I did not use the term, "Sanctuary Cities". Good.

Now, let me draw your attention to the thread title, which begins with these two words: California lawmakers

BTW, the term "Sanctuary Cities" does not appear in the thread tile either, does it? :rofl2:
Click to expand...

Reading is hard when you only have an IQ of 76.
 
domer76 said:
It is both sad and amusing to watch the last place finisher in the Special Olympics. What part of 'sanctuary' did you fail to understand, halfwit?
Click to expand...

I'm not the one who apparently thought that I posted about "sanctuary cities" in this thread, am I?

domer76 said:
(laughing) You truly are one stupid fuck. The concept of Sanctuary Cities has been identified and defined many times. Pull your head out of your ass and do your own homework for once, cretin. I won't do it for you. I'll understand that you won't because you have yet to do so, willful ignoramus.
Click to expand...

Clearly, you wouldn't even qualify for a participation trophy. :rofl2:
 
God bless America said:
I'm not the one who apparently thought that I posted about "sanctuary cities" in this thread, am I?



Clearly, you wouldn't even qualify for a participation trophy. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

I never said you did, fucking moron. In #36, I was referring to the THREAD TOPIC. The topic that obviously escaped you, idiot.

But I really want to thank you. Really, I do. Watching someone of your massive stupidity humiliate yourself is incredibly amusing.
 
LOL you guys should've just voted for Hillary. The reaction you guys seriously trying to impose fascism on the US is going to produce left leaning politics we had never even dreamed were possible before now.
 
well, at least we don't have to spend any federal tax money in California any more......we can use that money to build the wall......
 
Irish said:
California is now a sanctuary state. Law enforcement is now banned from contacting ICE if they come across illegal CRIMINAL aliens.

That's right. We have a state in our union openly defying federal law, and allowing criminal lawbreakers sanctuary.

More reason for a wall, since disgusting liberals rather destroy our republic than follow the rule of law.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/09/16/california-lawmakers-approve-sanctuary-state-bill.html
Click to expand...

What happens when a state law contradicts a U.S. federal law?

...State laws only govern the citizens within a particular state, but federal laws apply to all U.S. citizens. When state and federal laws clash, think of the federal law as the trump card. In theory, a state law that goes against federal law is null and void, but in practice, there's a bit more of a gray area. What it really comes down to is enforcement.
If a state defies federal law, but the federal government doesn't enforce its law in that state, is federal law really the trump card?...

The Doctrine of Pre-emption and The Supremacy Clause

...The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution. The supremacy cause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation. Basically, if a federal and state law contradict, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
The operative term here, though, is "can."...
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
What happens when a state law contradicts a U.S. federal law?

...State laws only govern the citizens within a particular state, but federal laws apply to all U.S. citizens. When state and federal laws clash, think of the federal law as the trump card. In theory, a state law that goes against federal law is null and void, but in practice, there's a bit more of a gray area. What it really comes down to is enforcement.
If a state defies federal law, but the federal government doesn't enforce its law in that state, is federal law really the trump card?...

The Doctrine of Pre-emption and The Supremacy Clause

...The law that applies to situations where state and federal laws disagree is called the supremacy clause, which is part of article VI of the Constitution. The supremacy cause contains what's known as the doctrine of pre-emption, which says that the federal government wins in the case of conflicting legislation. Basically, if a federal and state law contradict, then when you're in the state you can follow the state law, but the fed can decide to stop you.
The operative term here, though, is "can."...
Click to expand...

Yes, Federal law trumps state law.

Its not just up to the enforcement branch. The judicial branch is to review and nullify laws that are unconstitutional or violate federal laws. So far courts have not done a thing (with sanctuary policy). And don't expect the 9th Circus court, to do anything about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top