"California bill would allow citizens to enforce weapons ban"

We, the People were warned that would happen when Texas first broached the idea. Just more proof both sides want to take away our freedom.
I disagree. This is about superior intellect shoving it right up the ass of this horrid Supreme Court.

Now they're going to twist themselves into knots when they have to rule on this frivolous law.
 
My main concealed gun is an LC9-S. Great gun. If I’m not carrying concealed I carry the Glock 45 ACP. I have an old S&W Model 910 that I love to plink with. I chose the 22 so I can completely conceal it in my back pocket. It is mostly for carrying at church. Loaded with CCI Stingers and confidence in shot placement it is a great deterrent and from my hip pocket I can get it into action more quickly than the LC9 from my ankle holster.

Every gun I carry I have qualified with on the CLEET course. I won’t be able to qualify the 22 (the lowest caliber they’ll allow is a 9 mm) but after firing about 50 rounds through it this evening it wouldn’t be a problem to. For a pocket gun it is incredibly accurate.
Jesus won't protect you?
 
Abortion is not a constitutional right. It may be legal, but it isn't a constitutional right.

First, it's not an enumerated constitutional right.

Second, it's an unalienable right unless you are one of those commie cocksuckers who want the Feds to dominate the individual?

I'm sick and tired of authoritarian assholes seeking to impose their will upon others.
 
Last edited:
And you continue to prove you lied about being a Christian. Sad.

Why don't you just admit you don't give a shit about Jesus and all that crap?

Why don't you just fuck off and die like the piece of shit you are?

H5KddSu.jpeg




1 to 3 o'clock were just dialing in. Everything else is how it is.
 
Last edited:
citizens can 'enforce the assault weapon ban' ?

what could POSSIBLY go wrong ?

"You have an assault weapon and they're banned. You must give it to me by law !"
"you want my gun ? Here it comes..."
"bangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbang"
--sound of a magazine ejecting and another inserting--
"bangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbang"
 
citizens can 'enforce the assault weapon ban' ?

what could POSSIBLY go wrong ?

"You have an assault weapon and they're banned. You must give it to me by law !"
"you want my gun ? Here it comes..."
"bangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbang"
--sound of a magazine ejecting and another inserting--
"bangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbang"

Well, ya got yahoos and religious fanatics threatening and in some cases assaulting and/or killing women seeking abortions or the medical personnel that perform them.

But hey, now you got yahoos ready to shoot it out when they ratted to the cops (if this law were to pass)....yeah, when it's defenseless women, doctors and nurses it's no problem. :palm:
 
I disagree. This is about superior intellect shoving it right up the ass of this horrid Supreme Court.

Now they're going to twist themselves into knots when they have to rule on this frivolous law.

I hope SCOTUS affirms the rights of the individual.
 
citizens can 'enforce the assault weapon ban' ?

what could POSSIBLY go wrong ?

"You have an assault weapon and they're banned. You must give it to me by law !"
"you want my gun ? Here it comes..."
"bangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbang"
--sound of a magazine ejecting and another inserting--
"bangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbangbang"

LOL Result? Several dead liberals and another RW asshole on Death Row. :laugh:
 
Matt, your death threats make you look both crazy and weak.

Where do you get "Death threats" from target practice pictures, you fuckin' asshat?

Know this: If I wanted to, I could shoot you right in your asshole, bet.

Do you realize the spread of those holes vs. a human pinky nail?


A pinky nail is wider than most of that grouping.

The center and 4 o'clock are 5 shots.

You're fucking with the wrong cracker.
 
Last edited:
Where do you get "Death threats" from target practice pictures, you fuckin' asshat?

Know this: If I wanted to, I could shoot you right in your asshole, bet.

LOL QED

The problem with making public threats is that if something bad happens, there's a lot of documentation that the loudmouth had motive and means. All the cops need to do is prove opportunity and the loudmouth is looking at the wrong end of a murder trial.
 
LOL QED

The problem with making public threats is that if something bad happens, there's a lot of documentation that the loudmouth had motive and means. All the cops need to do is prove opportunity and the loudmouth is looking at the wrong end of a murder trial.

That's nice, honey. You're just mad you can't shoot like me, faggot.

Tough shit, cupcake, you're a suckass commie fucktard that can't shoot. Go eat a bag of dicks.

I'm an actual American.

I used to set off shotgun shells with my .22 and top out scrub oak saplings for fun, bitch.

How that works:

2 12p nails to hold shotgun shell to tree..nail them in just so to hold the shotgun shell..

Then you step back and pop off the primer. BOOM! Baby!
 
Last edited:
That's nice, honey. You're just mad you can't shoot like me, faggot.

Tough shit, cupcake, you're a suckass commie fucktard that can't shoot. Go eat a bag of dicks.

I'm an actual American.

I used to set off shotgun shells with my .22 and top out scrub oak saplings for fun, bitch.

How that works:

2 12p nails to hold shotgun shell to tree..nail them in just so to hold the shotgun shell..

Then you step back and pop off the primer. BOOM! Baby!

You're always funny when you're shitfaced. Is it time for you to start slapping around the old lady?
 
First, it's not an enumerated constitutional right.

Correct.

Second, it's an unalienable right unless you are one of those commie cocksuckers who want the Feds to dominate the individual?

Wrong. It's something in which two parties are involved and a civil matter of contractual law unless you consider the man involved nothing but a mindless sperm donor.

I'm sick and tired of authoritarian assholes seeking to impose their will upon others.

Like those that try to claim it's solely a woman's right to choose, but if she chooses to have the child suddenly the man involved is expected to pay child support?
 
The funny thing about this entire thread is that anyone would think a CA liberal would have the balls to actually try and do it. Just stand their and piss themselves.
 
Back
Top