California Assembly approves electoral vote change

I thought that was a post of the week nominee.




I'm not ignoring anything. It's just that I've decided that, rather than endlessly "debate" things to death, I'll cut it short when the person I am"debating" reveals himself to be an idiot and just leave it at that.



Actually, if you have a problem with how "undue influence" was applied in this discussion you should take it up with GL. He introduced the term to the discussion. But, he didn't incorrectly apply it, and neither did I. And I have defended my position with very basic fact that indisputably prove my position to be correct. It isn't my problem if you lack the ability to grasp the significance of those facts.

lmao

1. avoid any discussion of the actual topic and stick to ad homs
2. blame the undue influence on GL

yeah...you really are showing some intelligence nigel. you can't defend your use of the phrase, so all you can do you attack, attack, attack....and your liberal followers like dune will pat you on the back. you're weak, very weak. i'll give you another chance though:

how is wyoming's electoral votes an undue influence on american politics?

answer the question nigel. if you don't, it proves you know you're wrong, but can't admit it.
 
Do I really have to explain to you how a state with more electors as a percent of population has and undue influence corn eater?

yes, you do. you need to explain it in terms of what undue influence actually means and how wyoming's measely 3 electoral votes is an undue influence on the rest of the electoral votes, especially california's 55 electoral votes. i've explained undue influence to nigel, but he of course ignored it. i hope you don't do the same and instead look up what the term means and then apply it to your argument.

it is that simple.
 
Sounds like this was said by a person who lives in an area where all the power will be centralized. It simply gives population centers the power to control states with less population, "It doesn't matter how you vote, your vote will still go for whoever wins in the population centers."

Again, I don't get your point at all. Under the national popular vote system, it matters how everyone votes, not just the voters in the swing states.
 
lmao

1. avoid any discussion of the actual topic and stick to ad homs
2. blame the undue influence on GL

yeah...you really are showing some intelligence nigel. you can't defend your use of the phrase, so all you can do you attack, attack, attack....and your liberal followers like dune will pat you on the back. you're weak, very weak. i'll give you another chance though:

how is wyoming's electoral votes an undue influence on american politics?

answer the question nigel. if you don't, it proves you know you're wrong, but can't admit it.


FARGLE BARGLE
 
You are that simple. I don't have to explain shit to you. I made my opinion clear in post #29. Who the fuck are you to demand explainations from anyone but your mother?
Addtionaly, if you read my reply and are not mentaly retarded, you can see that I did explain it. Sorry it isn't to your satifaction.
 
You are that simple. I don't have to explain shit to you. I made my opinion clear in post #29. Who the fuck are you to demand explainations from anyone but your mother?
Addtionaly, if you read my reply and are not mentaly retarded, you can see that I did explain it. Sorry it isn't to your satifaction.

another weak nigel like post....when you're wrong....just attack, attack and hope your fellow libs believe your bullshit

how is wyoming's electoral votes an undue influence on american politics?

i gave you a chance to answer a simple question and you couldn't. since you and nigel are incapable of answering a simple question...i'll take that as a - we are wrong but to cowardly to admit it
 
Again, I don't get your point at all. Under the national popular vote system, it matters how everyone votes, not just the voters in the swing states.

No, it only really matters where population centers vote. Do you think anybody would care how a state with less population than large cities elsewhere are going to vote if their electoral college votes won't count? You might get upset over swing states, but those states would get upset of the total disregard they would "earn" through a populist system like this.

The reality is the system works, the population centers don't control the votes. They tend to get "upset" when other places count too, but that was exactly why the system is designed the way it is, so those places that don't have elevety-gazillion people count too.
 
another weak nigel like post....when you're wrong....just attack, attack and hope your fellow libs believe your bullshit



i gave you a chance to answer a simple question and you couldn't. since you and nigel are incapable of answering a simple question...i'll take that as a - we are wrong but to cowardly to admit it

Your ego is far larger than your ability.
 
This sounds stupid. Why would it make them bother campaigning more in CA? It doesn't make any sense at all.

I agree, saying that their votes go to whoever wins the most votes in the other 49 makes the opinion of California irrelevant, not more relevant.....
 
IMHO, the real reason for the electoral college was the high rate of illiteracy at the time of the founding. The founders didn't trust commoners to make an informed decision. The part about the states is B.S. The popular vote is all that should matter. The electoral college is an insult to the average citizen.
Maybe when you get to the higher grades you'll learn more about your country....
relatively few of the nation's inhabitants were able to participate in elections: among the excluded were most African Americans, Native Americans, women, men who had not attained their majority, and white males who did not own land. John Adams, signer of the Declaration of Independence and later president, wrote in 1776 that no good could come from enfranchising more Americans:

Its obvious, in talking to you, the high rate of illiteracy, is still of some concern in allowing pinheads to vote....
 
Maybe when you get to the higher grades you'll learn more about your country....
relatively few of the nation's inhabitants were able to participate in elections: among the excluded were most African Americans, Native Americans, women, men who had not attained their majority, and white males who did not own land. John Adams, signer of the Declaration of Independence and later president, wrote in 1776 that no good could come from enfranchising more Americans:

Its obvious, in talking to you, the high rate of illiteracy, is still of some concern in allowing pinheads to vote....

Umm, thanks Bravo, you unwittingly reinforced my argument and saved me from typing a lot of words.

Maybe if you were smarter, you would know that.
 
Back
Top