California as a Sanctuary State

anatta said:
If Clinton had won -would I be correct in lumping you in with the neocons who wrecked Libya-
and wanted to arm Syrian rebels like Clinton did? Would I blame you for her next war?
Would I say you are corrupt as she was? ( not to all of the above)

I made a choice. Anybody But Clinton =ABC..I like some of Trump's ideas, but I'm not a fan of Steve Bannon..
but it doesn't stop me for supporting Trump either.

If it all falls apart -yes I took the wrong position-but I took that position regardless of alt-right.
Click to expand...
No you would be incorrect since Clinton isn't a neocon you fucking ignorant child.
Cheney was a neo-con
Hillary is a neo-lib.
 
cawacko said:
California may fight back but when it comes to money the federal gov't will always have the upper hand
Click to expand...

Nope.
The federal gov cannot compel the states to enforce federal laws including via withholding funds.
Total thread fail
 
Rune said:
The Anti-Commandeering principle of the 10th ammendment
Click to expand...

Which would protect state's powers from federal legislation, but not from federal negation. Essentially, we live in a society where the federal government can extort the states and municipalities the way it did with the 21 drinking age. Because states have the power to "just say no," it doesn't violate the 10th.
 
Rune said:
No you would be incorrect since Clinton isn't a neocon you fucking ignorant child.
Cheney was a neo-con
Hillary is a neo-lib.
Click to expand...
it's a distinction without a difference. "Spreading democracy at the barrel of a gun (bomb sight)" is who she is.
 
blackascoal said:
Republican states have turned down federal dollars for years and survived.

So will these states and municipalities .. and will engender fierce opposition.
Click to expand...

Good. We can use the money for tax cuts for me and Commiefornia can absorb the costs of their lawlessness

We will also deport all illegals to Commiefornia to be welcomed with open arms
 
Death Watch said:
Good. We can use the money for tax cuts for me and Commiefornia can absorb the costs of their lawlessness

We will also deport all illegals to Commiefornia to be welcomed with open arms
Click to expand...

hopefully there is no tension between the new illegals and the lower wage earners in the cities. :awesome:
 
Threedee said:
Which would protect state's powers from federal legislation, but not from federal negation. Essentially, we live in a society where the federal government can extort the states and municipalities the way it did with the 21 drinking age. Because states have the power to "just say no," it doesn't violate the 10th.
Click to expand...

Right.
States have the power to say no.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top