Cain's numbers drop significantly!

Can you site me one post where I have used the word nigger to paint someone as a racist? When someone does or say's something racist I call them on it. I've been in an interracial marriage for a long time and though I've experienced very little of racial hate and bigotry myself I have first hand seen the ugliness and hurt that racial bigotry has caused people I love dearly so when I see racially bigoted comments, I don't have any problem on calling those doing it out on it.

I'll simply point it out next time it comes up. You'll note that I am not the only one to notice it considering some of the responses. If you have an urge to look up the posts in the past that use the word you can read them yourself. I don't have an urge to do that. You don't like that I mentioned your name, but you are one of the few that I know that use the word consistently. Even here, I would have avoided using that word. I don't use it, I won't any more than I would call my little sister the "g" word, considering she's from Vietnam.

Basically I pointed out that you use the word to "point out racism"... In this odd case, webbway was using the word in the same fashion while still being a racist himself.

I personally will not use the word, even to "point out racism"...

I have no belief that you are racist, I am simply pointing out how the word was used in this one post of webbway's...
 
Now here we go. Here is the right wing cry about Clarence (The correct way to spell his name, moron. Weren't you just giving Jarod a lecture??? Something about you being superior?) Thomas. It was racist to believe he committed sexual harassment in the work place against Anita Hill.

However, Hill was also black. But it's not racist to call her a liar and say that she could not have been sexually harassed by Thomas. Only Thomas' blackness counts here. This is the special hate that right wingers direct at black women.

I believe Anita Hill. A black woman who was sexually harassed by a pig.


I would wager you consider all black men pigs by the sound of your post.....

And the very same tactic is being used again right now against Mr. Cain.....and its a big success so far....


The right couldn't do even when Flowers, Clintons lover showed up and he was even tried for sexual harassment in a court to no avail....

I guess we just don't have the knack like you guys....
 
I would wager you consider all black men pigs by the sound of your post.....

And the very same tactic is being used again right now against Mr. Cain.....and its a big success so far....

No you wouldn't. You're just a racist right wing pig who enjoys pretending that liberals who call you what you are, are the real racists. Because you think that infuriates us. It makes me laugh, but I'm sure you've had some success with it in the past. If that's how a pos like you defines success.
 
Now here we go. Here is the right wing cry about Clarence (The correct way to spell his name, moron. Weren't you just giving Jarod a lecture??? Something about you being superior?) Thomas. It was racist to believe he committed sexual harassment in the work place against Anita Hill.

However, Hill was also black. But it's not racist to call her a liar and say that she could not have been sexually harassed by Thomas. Only Thomas' blackness counts here. This is the special hate that right wingers direct at black women.

I believe Anita Hill. A black woman who was sexually harassed by a pig.

People don't remember, but at least 2 women came out after Hill to say that Thomas had done the same to them. That actually wasn't played up in the media as much.

I still can't believe that Thomas is on the Court, and also that he's still there. What a standard.
 
I'll simply point it out next time it comes up. You'll note that I am not the only one to notice it considering some of the responses. If you have an urge to look up the posts in the past that use the word you can read them yourself. I don't have an urge to do that. You don't like that I mentioned your name, but you are one of the few that I know that use the word consistently. Even here, I would have avoided using that word. I don't use it, I won't any more than I would call my little sister the "g" word, considering she's from Vietnam.

Basically I pointed out that you use the word to "point out racism"... In this odd case, webbway was using the word in the same fashion while still being a racist himself.

I personally will not use the word, even to "point out racism"...

I have no belief that you are racist, I am simply pointing out how the word was used in this one post of webbway's...
The only time you'll come even close is when I pointed out that call President Obama "The Messiah" was bigotted and pointed out what just about any African American will tell you it means to them. Have you ever asked an African American what it means to them when you refer to President Obama as "The Messiah"?
 
I got news for you dumbass; any man after a young white blond woman is not exactly unpredictable. Which I'm sure you know.


Well, you sure got you "stereotypes" all in order don't you.....thats very telling.
 
I would wager you consider all black men pigs by the sound of your post.....

And the very same tactic is being used again right now against Mr. Cain.....and its a big success so far....




By the way that's supposed to read "and it's a big success so far..."

Not only do you mistakenly use the possessive "its" instead of the contraction "it's", you also do not know what an ellipsis is, though you appear to think you know.

What's that you were saying about Jarod, moron?
 
The only time you'll come even close is when I pointed out that call President Obama "The Messiah" was bigotted and pointed out what just about any African American will tell you it means to them. Have you ever asked an African American what it means to them when you refer to President Obama as "The Messiah"?

No, you didn't. You changed a word in another's quote to the n-word to try to underline how you think they are racist. It's the second of the examples of Superfreak's...

Seriously, you appear to feel aggrieved, but I didn't mention your name because I think you are racist, I mentioned it because you are the only other person that I know that uses the word in any form regularly, and it is how it was used in this one case... Basically "putting words in another's mouth"...
 
People don't remember, but at least 2 women came out after Hill to say that Thomas had done the same to them. That actually wasn't played up in the media as much.

I still can't believe that Thomas is on the Court, and also that he's still there. What a standard.

Yes that's true and even I often leave that out. I never could believe it either.
 
The only time you'll come even close is when I pointed out that call President Obama "The Messiah" was bigotted and pointed out what just about any African American will tell you it means to them. Have you ever asked an African American what it means to them when you refer to President Obama as "The Messiah"?

You are full of shit Mott.

It is not about Obama or his skin pigmentation..... just like we told you 1000 times in the past. YOU want to make it about his skin color. Being a 'messiah/savior' has nothing to do with skin color. NOTHING.
 
Yes that's true and even I often leave that out. I never could believe it either.

Why not? There was a veritable line of women accusing Clinton but he was able to win election, reelection and be called a "great president" by even the NOW...

I can't imagine how you could be "shocked" that Thomas could serve on the SCOTUS.
 
No, you didn't. You changed a word in another's quote to the n-word to try to underline how you think they are racist. It's the second of the examples of Superfreak's...

Seriously, you appear to feel aggrieved, but I didn't mention your name because I think you are racist, I mentioned it because you are the only other person that I know that uses the word in any form regularly, and it is how it was used in this one case... Basically "putting words in another's mouth"...

Yeah yeah yeah. You don't know anyone except for Webbway who uses that word. First of all, that's BS. But most importantly, let's look at why.

Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger"

That's Lee Atwater one of your boys. One of your very successful, southern strategy, boys.

There's one word for that; deniability. And guys like you eat that up. You're the perfect mark for denability because you are all about it. Deny deny deny.

So you can pretend that you don't see the racism on the right as long as they aren't pulling a webbway. But Atwater gave you what you need, and you're smart enough to know it. You just deny it.

Deniability.
 
Why not? There was a veritable line of women accusing Clinton but he was able to win election, reelection and be called a "great president" by even the NOW...

I can't imagine how you could be "shocked" that Thomas could serve on the SCOTUS.

One is a White Democrat... the other a Black Republican....

;)
 
Yeah yeah yeah. You don't know anyone except for Webbway who uses that word. First of all, that's BS. But most importantly, let's look at why.

Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger" — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me — because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger"

That's Lee Atwater one of your boys. One of your very successful, southern strategy, boys.

There's one word for that; deniability. And guys like you eat that up. You're the perfect mark for denability because you are all about it. Deny deny deny.

So you can pretend that you don't see the racism on the right as long as they aren't pulling a webbway. But Atwater gave you what you need, and you're smart enough to know it. You just deny it.

Deniability.

Wall of text that makes no sense in the context of Damocles' life, or even the post we are talking about here.

:dunno:
 
Back
Top