Cain changes his story

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
I think you're all being somewhat harsh on Herman Caines.

Who here can put hand on heart and say we haven't forgotten some sexual harassment allegations in our past? We busy chaps can't be expected to remember everything, you know? Birthdays, anniversaries, payments and confidentiality clauses made to silence a damaging sexual slur. Anyway, since the advent of political correctness one can't do anything without being accused of something or other. It's all "don't put your hands there" and "stop touching those". Some fancy lawyer once tried to tell me it was 'illegal' to put cameras in the women's toilets. Madness.

Give the man a break people. If Herman Caines says the allegations were ridiculous then i am inclined to believe him, at least until he remembers something else.


Totally. I mean, what's the world coming to when a CEO cannot invite a subordinate employee up to his room after a little drinking at a conference without being accused of making unwanted sexual advances?
 
right.....so now not remembering and then remembering is "changing" your story

you need more than TP for your bunghole dungheap

That is correct.

He told ONE version of events...

THEN he told ANOTHER version of events...

And that's how his story CHANGED.
 
no. you obviously no zero about testimony. it is called refreshing your memory. it is not called changing your story.

that someone doesn't remember something from YEARS prior and then has their memory refreshed happens all the time.

go find a single trial lawyer that says when they had to refresh a witness who said they couldn't remember, that they changed their testimony. the testimony is the same, the only difference is, the memory is refreshed. stated a simpler way for you, if i claim i don't remember something now, say a claim i made, and then you cite where i made that claim, that does not change the fact or story that at the time i did not remember making that claim.

good lord, this is basic logic. you don't need a law degree to understand this stuff dung.


But you've said time and again that you AREN'T a lawyer, that you ARE a meter maid.

Why would anyone believe what a meter maid knows, regarding "testimony"?

or are you planning to...




wait for it...




CHANGE YOUR STORY...ROTFLMAO!!
 
reread what i posted

tell me...how is it not remembering something and then getting refreshed....changing your story.

Only a partisan hack like the Yurtard would put forth a gigantic pile of total horseshit and expect others to accept it as fact.

If I relate a tale of my adventures while on vacation to my friends, and then a few days after returning I recall some activities I enjoyed that I didn't mention originally, and I relate them to my friends...I have now CHANGED MY STORY to include the events originally left out.

I don't expect you to admit you are wrong about this, any more than I expect you to with regards to ANY of the numerous times you've been proven to be in the wrong...but this does promise to be quite a bit of fun...LOL
 
he didn't change his story

a rose is a rose is a rose and a rose by any other name would smell as sweet

call it what you will, but a change is a change regardless of the reason for the change

he should not have spoken until he got his facts right - he got caught unprepared because he and his staff are amateurs
 
a rose is a rose is a rose and a rose by any other name would smell as sweet

call it what you will, but a change is a change regardless of the reason for the change

he should not have spoken until he got his facts right - he got caught unprepared because he and his staff are amateurs

i don't remember. now i remember.

not changing a story.

good grief
 
Only a partisan hack like the Yurtard would put forth a gigantic pile of total horseshit and expect others to accept it as fact.

If I relate a tale of my adventures while on vacation to my friends, and then a few days after returning I recall some activities I enjoyed that I didn't mention originally, and I relate them to my friends...I have now CHANGED MY STORY to include the events originally left out.

I don't expect you to admit you are wrong about this, any more than I expect you to with regards to ANY of the numerous times you've been proven to be in the wrong...but this does promise to be quite a bit of fun...LOL

ah the proven liar swings wildly but misses the mark as usual. i'm not surprised you couldn't answer a simple question:

tell me...how is it not remembering something and then getting refreshed....changing your story.

i doubt you will, because you always run away from hard questions after you make a fool out of yourself
 
But you've said time and again that you AREN'T a lawyer, that you ARE a meter maid.

Why would anyone believe what a meter maid knows, regarding "testimony"?

or are you planning to...




wait for it...




CHANGE YOUR STORY...ROTFLMAO!!

ah, another obsessive fan who can't stop thinking about my personal life. what is it with obsessive creepy lefties on this board....
 
Look, it's fine for you to think he didn't change his story. I'm OK with that. It seems quite obvious to me that he did.

no surprise you can't answer a simple question

tell me...how is it not remembering something and then getting refreshed....changing your story.
 
m'eh...

He remembered something. He's being honest. I can live with that.

Now, if she really wants to bring it out to the public it isn't the newspapers her lawyer needs to speak with, it would be the Restauranteurs Association.
 
no surprise you can't answer a simple question

tell me...how is it not remembering something and then getting refreshed....changing your story.


He didn't get refreshed. He conveniently didn't remember, then remembered one thing, then remembered one thing a few more things, but as to the few more things, the only thing he remembers is that they were ridiculous but not what they were.

And he didn't know of any settlement but he hoped it wasn't much money. Then he did remember a settlement. Then the settlement was just an agreement. Then the agreement was for 3-6 months salary.

Get real, Yurt.
 
He didn't get refreshed. He conveniently didn't remember, then remembered one thing, then remembered one thing a few more things, but as to the few more things, the only thing he remembers is that they were ridiculous but not what they were.

And he didn't know of any settlement but he hoped it wasn't much money. Then he did remember a settlement. Then the settlement was just an agreement. Then the agreement was for 3-6 months salary.

Get real, Yurt.

now you're full of shit. he didn't remember, you have no facts to support it was convenient. further, how do you know he wasn't refreshed AFTER the interview? it makes perfect sense that afterwards his staff reminded him or he remembered himself.

a settlement is an agreement idiot. you're just making shit up.
 
now you're full of shit. he didn't remember, you have no facts to support it was convenient. further, how do you know he wasn't refreshed AFTER the interview? it makes perfect sense that afterwards his staff reminded him or he remembered himself.

It doesn't make any sense at all. Politico contacted his campaign for comment and gave specifics regarding the allegations prior to printing the story. I don't buy the claim that he didn't remember anything after being made aware of the Politico story but suddenly remembered a whole host of convenient particulars. Like I said, it's fine by me if you want to buy it, but it doesn't mean he hasn't changed his story o


a settlement is an agreement idiot. you're just making shit up.

What?
 
right.....so now not remembering and then remembering is "changing" your story

you need more than TP for your bunghole dungheap

Jeez, of course it's "changing." He remembered something different and CHANGED the story to reflect the new information.
 
(Posted by charver) I think you're all being somewhat harsh on Herman Caines.

Who here can put hand on heart and say we haven't forgotten some sexual harassment allegations in our past? We busy chaps can't be expected to remember everything, you know? Birthdays, anniversaries, payments and confidentiality clauses made to silence a damaging sexual slur. Anyway, since the advent of political correctness one can't do anything without being accused of something or other. It's all "don't put your hands there" and "stop touching those". Some fancy lawyer once tried to tell me it was 'illegal' to put cameras in the women's toilets. Madness.

Give the man a break people. If Herman Caines says the allegations were ridiculous then i am inclined to believe him, at least until he remembers something else.

Totally. I mean, what's the world coming to when a CEO cannot invite a subordinate employee up to his room after a little drinking at a conference without being accused of making unwanted sexual advances?

Exactly! Who remembers every sexual indiscretion? Every lascivious innuendo? Every "Hey, babe. Wanna see my etchings?"
 
Jeez, of course it's "changing." He remembered something different and CHANGED the story to reflect the new information.

i don't remember. now i remember.

is not changing your story as at the time he did not remember, that is still true and unchanged.

good lord, you lefties are bent around an axle over this.
 
It doesn't make any sense at all. Politico contacted his campaign for comment and gave specifics regarding the allegations prior to printing the story. I don't buy the claim that he didn't remember anything after being made aware of the Politico story but suddenly remembered a whole host of convenient particulars. Like I said, it's fine by me if you want to buy it, but it doesn't mean he hasn't changed his story o




What?

you're entitled to your make believe story. but the fact remains, he claims he did not remember. you have nothing to support your wishful thinking.

if you don't understand that a settlement is an agreement, then you're an idiot.
 
ah, another obsessive fan who can't stop thinking about my personal life. what is it with obsessive creepy lefties on this board....

Nice job totally avoiding the information presented that shows you've CHANGED YOUR STORY.

We going to be doing this for long? I sure hope so, because I have a feeling this could even be more entertaining than watching that fool DY tapdance around his lies on the "Bachmann Loses Georgia" thread.
 
Jeez, of course it's "changing." He remembered something different and CHANGED the story to reflect the new information.

This is just another example of the Yurtard's total inability to admit when he's wrong.

Of COURSE Cain has changed his story...he's done so three or four times now...but to a total hack like the Yurtard, the truth is nowhere near as important as covering for Cain's clumsy lies.
 
Last edited:
This is just another example of the yurtard's total inability toadmit when he's wrong.

Of COURSE Cain has changed his story...he's done so three or four times now...but to a total hack like the Yurtard, the truth is nowhere near as important as covering for Cain's clumsy lies.

another non contribution insult fest by zappa
 
Back
Top