CA Prop. 8 shot down

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
Darla said:
You're dealing with bigoted legislation that is being overturned and superseded in court cases across the land.

Which is why I said that any of your fellow bigots could have found court cases upholding anti-miscegenation laws at one time, and it's exactly what shows that we are in the middle of yet another American expansion of civil rights. And with that, we get yet another group of bigoted, hateful, ignoramuses like yourself desperately fighting against that expansion.

But historically, you've never stayed relevant. Just how it is.
Click to expand...

Those same bigoted laws that did not allow women to own property or vote. Thank goodness for forward thinking people.
 
dixon76710 said:
???? Its in the many court cases Ive cited. The BC Roman law Ive cited, it was never in my ass, cunt.
Click to expand...

Wow, you lose. She was schooling you, emasculating you, so you lowered yourself to this level, nice job...you just lost all credibility, if you ever had any.
 
dixon76710 said:
Straight couple who remarries has the potential of procreation, the lesbian couple does not. And if a married lesbian becomes pregnant, her lesbian lover has no relation to the child. No obligation to suport the child. Whereas the remarried husbands wife were to become pregnant, he is obligated to support those children.
Marriage ONLY creates paternal rights and obligations in the case of a man married to a woman. Gays want all the goodies that go along with marriage without ever being subjected to the parental obligations to children created by marriage between heterosexuals.
Click to expand...

How do you know that a homosexual doesn't WANT those parental rights.
 
dixon76710 said:
Nope, marriage is about dealing with the product of that procreation. Procreation that can only occur among the heterosexual couples.
And government cant know which couples can or will procreate with any certainty. Thus the encouragement of all heterosexual couples.
Click to expand...

Stupid, ridiculous, my friends knew before they married they would not procreate, they were 75 and 70 years old. Should the government deny them the right to marry? I am pretty certain the clerk was aware the wouldn't be making any babies?
 
Superfreak said:
I admire the staying power of those that continue to debate this with Alias and his ilk. I am glad I get away from this on the weekends. Bashing my head against a wall of bigots like Alias 7 days a week would get old fast.
Click to expand...

I wonder how those that believe like Alias are going to react, when the Supreme Court strikes down the anti-gay marriage laws.
 
Darla said:
Another paternalistic view of marriage. Tell us Mr. Misogynist, what on earth does that have to do with gays marrying??? You didn't even answer his question, in context. In context, he wanted to know what procreation has to do with denying gays the legal rights that heterosexuals enjoy to visitation rights, inheritance rights, and property rights.

You posted word salad in response.
Click to expand...

It wasn't even salad, it was more like sewage...
 
Alias said:
You can be who you are, no problem. The problem is when you decide to teach in our public schools that you were born that way and you are as normal as heterosexuals. That is a lie. There is no scientific evidence you were born that way.
Click to expand...

AND

You can be who you are, no problem. The problem is when you decide to teach in our public schools that you were born that way and you are as normal as homosexuals. That is a lie. There is no scientific evidence you were born that way.
 
dixon76710 said:
Majority of births are unplanned. They didnt decide anything. It happened. Exclusively among the heterosexual couples, never among the homosexual couples. And if they adopt, the marriage doesnt create the parental rights and responsibilitioes. The adoption does.
Click to expand...

Maybe back in your day 1BC, but some of us have evolved beyond the Bronze Age
 
Alias said:
Your post is not saying anything of substance. We all eat and crap, laugh, cry, etc. Of course there are things we all do.

What is your definition of "suitable parents"? That's the point. A NORMAL healthy family is a mother and father and children. That is the American culture we want to maintain. Strong healthy families make America stronger and healthier.
Click to expand...

Geez, that's propaganda right out of the Goebbels playbook.

poster26.jpg


A Nazi propaganda poster encourages healthy Germans to raise a large family. The caption, in German, reads: "Healthy Parents have Healthy Children." Germany, date uncertain.
 
Superfreak said:
2) You have not stated one thing that refutes my comments on the need for rights given to married straight couples (inheritance, visitation, etc...) to also be provided to gay couples.
Click to expand...

I directly addressed your comments. Thats when you went for the allegations of bigotry, because you had nothing to respond with to the substance of my post
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Kind of like all those anti-intermarriage laws, that were on the books for hundreds of years; HUH!!
Click to expand...

Nope. Those were civil rights. You keep making the same mistake. Aren't you the one complaining about people making the same mistake in logic........
 
Rana said:
Two parent homes does not guarantee the well being of the children, sorry, not a good reason to deny gays their rights.
Click to expand...

What right do I have that a gay person doesn't have? I can't marry a person of my own sex in my state either. Same exact right.
 
christiefan915 said:
Geez, that's propaganda right out of the Goebbels playbook.

poster26.jpg


A Nazi propaganda poster encourages healthy Germans to raise a large family. The caption, in German, reads: "Healthy Parents have Healthy Children." Germany, date uncertain.
Click to expand...

I disagree. I don't support murdering anyone. You and your pals like to murder children right in the womb. I think that's more like Goebels. What about that human being's "civil rights"?

I love it when you and your pals try to demonize conservatives. As long as you support abortion, you're not EVER gonna make your case.
 
Rana said:
Maybe back in your day 1BC, but some of us have evolved beyond the Bronze Age
Click to expand...

No, I was referring to the present. Majority of births result from unplanned pregnancies, TODAY. Exclusively among the heterosexual couples, TODAY and never among the homosexual couples, TODAY. Your unshakeable belief that this isnt so, offers a beautiful demonstration of the completeness of your detachment from reality.
 
Alias said:
I disagree. I don't support murdering anyone. You and your pals like to murder children right in the womb. I think that's more like Goebels. What about that human being's "civil rights"?

I love it when you and your pals try to demonize conservatives. As long as you support abortion, you're not EVER gonna make your case.
Click to expand...

Are you on board with the "seamless garment"?

In 1971, Roman Catholic pacifist Eileen Egan used St. John the Apostle's phrase the seamless garment, referring to describe a holistic reverence for life. The seamless garment of life is a reference from John 19:23 to the seamless robe of Jesus, which his executioners did not tear apart. The seamless garment philosophy holds that issues such as abortion, capital punishment, militarism, euthanasia, social injustice, and economic injustice all demand a consistent application of moral principles that value the sacredness of human life. "The protection of life", said Egan, "is a seamless garment. You can't protect some life and not others." Her words were meant to challenge members of the pro-life movement, as well as those who are in favor of capital punishment, to adopt a consistent life ethic. [/I]
 
Oh yes, all you progressives are so hip and smart. You're gonna make a much better world. Yes, yes. We've never heard that before from social engineers. This time will be different. Yes, yes. We believe.
 
Alias said:
Oh yes, all you progressives are so hip and smart. You're gonna make a much better world. Yes, yes. We've never heard that before from social engineers. This time will be different. Yes, yes. We believe.
Click to expand...

Who are you talking to?

Are you on board with "the seamless garment"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top