Burquas for attractive women...

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
They corrupt the public morals by running around with flesh showing.

Lets adopt the more conservative position with regards to how we allow women to dress.....

Fully covered or else!
 
Don't give the freedom hating right wingnuts any more ideas, they already want to control our lives and our marriages.
 
So long as I get to decide who is attractive by thorough hands-on investigation I'll go with this.
 
Is that not the same argument against allowing public nudity, just to a further extreem?
 
Jarod said:
Is that not the same argument against allowing public nudity, just to a further extreem?
Click to expand...
No. It isn't. It's a silly attempt to equate two rather different things. The SCOTUS makes it clear that you can have laws against nudity under certain circumstances, so I asked if they met those, you attempted to take that question and make something inane out of it. If they made a concerted effort to desexualize it and ensure that they weren't seen by those underage then the government overstepped.
 
Damocles said:
No. It isn't. It's a silly attempt to equate two rather different things. The SCOTUS makes it clear that you can have laws against nudity under certain circumstances, so I asked if they met those, you attempted to take that question and make something inane out of it. If they made a concerted effort to desexualize it and ensure that they weren't seen by those underage then the government overstepped.
Click to expand...

You said they should not be seen by teenage boys... Why?
 
Jarod said:
You said they should not be seen by teenage boys... Why?
Click to expand...
The point was that they need to make some effort desexualize it, or they aren't protected by what you pretend they were protected by.

If they gathered at some public beach in order to create controversy, the only "controversy" possible is the actual sexualization of their silly display. They were then open to arrest, they broke the law and the SCOTUS says they did...

Your answer to an actual question about what happened there, was to play cute and post another thread making assumptions and playing on the "for instance".

In order to show some effort to desexualize they need to ensure they are in the proper venue for their display. Did they make any effort to ensure their display would not be sexualized? If they did not, they were definitely ripe for arrest and had no First Amendment protection according to the SCOTUS.
 
Damocles said:
No. It isn't. It's a silly attempt to equate two rather different things. The SCOTUS makes it clear that you can have laws against nudity under certain circumstances, so I asked if they met those, you attempted to take that question and make something inane out of it. If they made a concerted effort to desexualize it and ensure that they weren't seen by those underage then the government overstepped.
Click to expand...

Purely sexual reason... thats the only excuse to make nudity illegal... Not did they take every step to ensure a teenage boy does not see it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top