Bungling Biden’s regime is 1 1/2 year old—and it’s a total nightmare.

If Earl actually understood how stupid he reveals himself to be, we could then give him credit for having the courage to do it anyway.
Somehow, however, I don't think that's the case.
 
Okay...let's get to the Trump stuff immediately.

On his worst day in office so far, Joe Biden has shown himself to be a MUCH, MUCH better president for the United States than Trump was on his very best day in office.

I suspect you cannot see that...but you are a Trump supporter, so being able to see the obvious is not one of your talents.

So I assume you consider Joe to be a great president. One of the greatest in modern history.
 
PLEASE SPECIFY IN WHAT WAYS BIDEN IS A BETTER POTUS THAN TRUMP.

Sure.

IN EVERY FUCKING WAY IMAGINABLE!

Let me acknowledge, though, that being a better POTUS than Trump is not all that great an achievement. Every other president we have ever had was a better president than Trump.
 
So I assume you consider Joe to be a great president. One of the greatest in modern history.

Only a moron would take what I said to make that assumption...so I will assume you are a moron.

No, I do not consider Joe Biden to be a great president. I do not even consider the fact that he is better than Trump to be especially important or significant, because EVERY president we've ever had has been a better president than Trump.
 
Only a moron would take what I said to make that assumption...so I will assume you are a moron.

No, I do not consider Joe Biden to be a great president. I do not even consider the fact that he is better than Trump to be especially important or significant, because EVERY president we've ever had has been a better president than Trump.

We are not doing great in the Presidential quality area thats for sure.
 
Yes but God also created that life. Women by themselves can't make life.

This is your opinion, which I, among others, would not consider an informed one.

Try to understand, BreakdownLane, that even believing that your god exists is not a national requirement.
We're not a theocracy.

Therefore, your hypothetical god's "commands" should not be written into the laws of our land.
Doing so is a Taliban-like position. The towel-head beliefs, understand, are no less ludicrous than yours.
 
1658324593649-png.1041071
 
This is your opinion, which I, among others, would not consider an informed one.

Try to understand, BreakdownLane, that even believing that your god exists is not a national requirement.
We're not a theocracy.

Therefore, your hypothetical god's "commands" should not be written into the laws of our land.
Doing so is a Taliban-like position. The towel-head beliefs, understand, are no less ludicrous than yours.
Yes I know we aren't a theocracy I was discussing why God had the right to claim the lives of his creations. Women on their own cannot create life. They own their own should not be allowed to terminate someone else's life either.


Towel head? More bigoted racist belief from the leftist racist from the shithole city of Boston.
 
I know this is going to be a difficult question for you. But do try to think real hard. Where does that sperm in those sperm banks ultimatly come from? Think hard now.

No dopey the comparison is simple. A man can not create a life without a surrogate. The sperm is useless without the female. A female can create life because she is the vessel which carries the fetus with the help of in vitro from a sperm bank. I'm well aware of where sperm comes from. DUH In other words she doesn't need to have sex to get pregnant any sperm will do.
 
No dopey the comparison is simple. A man can not create a life without a surrogate. The sperm is useless without the female. A female can create life because she is the vessel which carries the fetus with the help of in vitro from a sperm bank. I'm well aware of where sperm comes from. DUH In other words she doesn't need to have sex to get pregnant any sperm will do.
Nope a woman can't CREATE life alone. She MUST have a sperm donor then she can nourish that life. That life is a unique human individual programs its own unique development. The woman is only a nourishment device for the developing unique human being. If a woman can create life on her own why do we even need sperm banks.

BTW I have taken Embryology and Human Development courses on the postgraduate level.
 
Last edited:
Nope a woman can't CREATE life alone. She MUST have a sperm donor then she can nourish that life. That life is a unique human individual programs its own unique development. The woman is only a nourishment device for the developing unique human being. If a woman can create life on her own why do we even need sperm banks.

BTW I have taken Embryology and Human Development courses on the postgraduate level.

You missed the point. A man can not get pregnant so his sperm is worthless. A female only needsin vitro with sperm from any donor. The sperm is nothing without the vessel to carry the fetus. Do you not understand that part? The woman controls the nourishment to the fetus or it will die. I never said a woman can create life on her own without a sperm bank donor, I said all she needs is a sperm bank. A male needs to find a surrogate who is willing to carry a fetus for him to create that life which is a lot harder. And I don't know of any straight male that would want a surrogate it's usually a gay male that looks for a surrogate so he can have a child of his own. The zygote, embryo and fetus is all inside the female body, she alone develops that fetus into a person. The male body does not have the internal organs to bring forth a life.
 
Women don't have to cross their legs or zip their pants, they are not the one who fertilizes an egg. Those eggs get flushed out every month.

Bullshit! They are 50% of the problem--at least. Or are you trying to claim all human sex is rape?
 
Back
Top