Bundy scumbags get their spokeman killed

maybe if I type this slowly, you'll be able to READ. I. AM. NOT. A. DECENT. PERSON!!!!!!!

Hey! We agree on something! :)

and I want her, in fact, I want EVERYONE (including you) to feel the jackboots because apparently you fucking government lovers need to feel the effects of the overbearing federal government DIRECTLY. it seems to be the ONLY way people seem to give a damn. until you do, I hate you all. I have no pity, sympathy, or empathy for you slavery loving fucktards.

Ah, NOW I see.

Tell me, what is it that made you not a decent person, "not anymore, at least"?

What harm was done to you to turned you into this "not a decent person"?
 
Last edited:
Ah, NOW I see.

Tell me, what is it that made you not a decent person, "not anymore, at least"?

What harm was done to you to turn you into this "not a decent person"?

it is irrelevant what harm was done to me. it is irrelevant because people here and in the world don't fucking care. oh, they may say things like 'sorry that happened' or 'it's your own damn fault for (insert bullshit reason here), and some people would even say I deserved it simply because it's about a political position that they can't stand.

basically i'm done with the lot of you as far as caring about what you stand for, what you think, or even what you are. I get flack from both sides of your idiot political spectrums because y'all can't stand the scary thought of actual freedom/liberty.
 
Who is Desh talking to when she randomly replies with no quotes in the middle of a forum. Has she not figured out the very uncomplicated forum buttons yet?

No one really can be sure who she's talking to and it may just be the voices in her head. :dunno:

It has been suggested several times, to her, that she utilize the quote feature; but it seems like it's beyond her capabilities and understanding, for the most pat. :palm:
 
it is irrelevant what harm was done to me. it is irrelevant because people here and in the world don't fucking care. oh, they may say things like 'sorry that happened' or 'it's your own damn fault for (insert bullshit reason here), and some people would even say I deserved it simply because it's about a political position that they can't stand.

basically i'm done with the lot of you as far as caring about what you stand for, what you think, or even what you are. I get flack from both sides of your idiot political spectrums because y'all can't stand the scary thought of actual freedom/liberty.

I was just wondering, really. Because it seems that you have this whole anti-government thing (and seem to belong to a militia and/or Oathkeepers). That might indicate a disregard for laws and social mores.

You want everyone to feel jackboots on their throats. I think that indicates a disregard for the rights of others.

You have no pity, no sympathy and no empathy. By your own statement it seems you have a failure to feel remorse or guilt.

Do you have a tendency to display violent behavior, too? I mean, you're wishing horrible deaths on others.
 
FBI Murdered Oregon Militia Member LaVoy Finicum with His Hands Up....

Seems Obama's stormtroopers took a page from Clinton's playbook...guess he wants another Oklahoma bombing....

Finicum was shot charging towards arresting officers according to Bundy's people who witnessed his shooting my racist friend.
Who's going to bomb the next federal building? You?
Nah you are just a racist coward, keyboard warrior.
Lol
 
stop lying. you publicly claim that you 'feel badly' about the violence, but you damned well know that from the get go you wanted these people to suffer for their blatant violations of laws YOU support. how dare they buck your precious federal government? this is the exact reason why liberals are despised. it's because you are indeed takers. you have zero respect for anyone or anything except what your masters tell you that you are entitled to. you have no sense of freedom, only slavery. your cognitive dissonance kicks in to high gear so that you can rebut anything that would abuse you of the notion that what you believe is indeed correct, so much so that you WILLINGLY excuse flagrant abuses of government in the belief that it's there to protect you.

face the truth, which is that you prefer slavery to the state over freedom because you are a coward of the highest caliber. end of the fucking story.

So if I wanted to build a house, in what is now a Federal Park, I should just be able to do it?
Fell as many trees as I need, cut and build a road, etc.; just because I decided that I wanted to live there?
 
it is irrelevant what harm was done to me. it is irrelevant because people here and in the world don't fucking care. oh, they may say things like 'sorry that happened' or 'it's your own damn fault for (insert bullshit reason here), and some people would even say I deserved it simply because it's about a political position that they can't stand.

basically i'm done with the lot of you as far as caring about what you stand for, what you think, or even what you are. I get flack from both sides of your idiot political spectrums because y'all can't stand the scary thought of actual freedom/liberty.

Hey Paul Revere, the boards perennial racist has come to your defense. That must make you feel pretty good , eh? Are you going to friend him now?
 
I was just wondering, really. Because it seems that you have this whole anti-government thing (and seem to belong to a militia and/or Oathkeepers). That might indicate a disregard for laws and social mores.[\QUOTE]it's wholly American to be anti-government. even the founders mistrusted government, thus the LIMITING aspect of the constitution. as to a disregard for 'laws and social mores', yeah I got that too. Despite the fact that I do not care for marijuana, I firmly believe that the constitution provides ZERO power to the federal government to regulate it, much less prohibit it. Same thing with gun laws. the 2nd Amendment SPECIFICALLY DENIES the feds any power over firearms, yet they do so with idiot public approval.

You want everyone to feel jackboots on their throats. I think that indicates a disregard for the rights of others.
OR, it could indicate the necessity for others to have a regard for the rights of others. people tend to disregard SOME rights because it doesn't affect them, so maybe if they felt that oppression, it would change their minds.

You have no pity, no sympathy and no empathy. By your own statement it seems you have a failure to feel remorse or guilt.
now that's an idiotic assumption on your part. there can be no explanation for how you came to that conclusion other than stupidity.

Do you have a tendency to display violent behavior, too? I mean, you're wishing horrible deaths on others.
seeing how I have no violent criminal offenses in any way, shape, or form on my criminal record, this would be more assumption on your part. please tell me you are not some sort of professional in the mental health industry.
 
So if I wanted to build a house, in what is now a Federal Park, I should just be able to do it?
Fell as many trees as I need, cut and build a road, etc.; just because I decided that I wanted to live there?

you SHOULD have had the ability to buy the land from another private person, meaning that the federal government shouldn't have been able to abscond property from the state or any other entity and declare it a federal park.
 
it's wholly American to be anti-government. even the founders mistrusted government, thus the LIMITING aspect of the constitution. as to a disregard for 'laws and social mores', yeah I got that too. Despite the fact that I do not care for marijuana, I firmly believe that the constitution provides ZERO power to the federal government to regulate it, much less prohibit it. Same thing with gun laws. the 2nd Amendment SPECIFICALLY DENIES the feds any power over firearms, yet they do so with idiot public approval.

Except that the Supreme Court, in their capacity to engage in judicial review, has stated that no law or right in the Constitution is without limits. But we've been over that before.

OR, it could indicate the necessity for others to have a regard for the rights of others. people tend to disregard SOME rights because it doesn't affect them, so maybe if they felt that oppression, it would change their minds.

I don't believe so. People who have lived in such a regime would be more likely to find other ways to change minds.

now that's an idiotic assumption on your part. there can be no explanation for how you came to that conclusion other than stupidity.

I made absolutely no assumption or conclusion. It was a correlation. There's a vast difference. An inability to feel emotions like sympathy and empathy - an ability to connect with the situation or feelings of others - might lead to a lack of other emotions that connect with others, such as remorse or guilt. If we have no connection to others with at least some kind of emotional context, then the likelihood that we will "feel bad" for doing something to them is lessened.

seeing how I have no violent criminal offenses in any way, shape, or form on my criminal record, this would be more assumption on your part.

I made no assumption as to whether or not you have violent tendencies. I asked a question. (Whether or not you have any violent offences on your criminal record is irrelevant, since one could have violent tendencies without being accused, charged, indicted or convicted.)

please tell me you are not some sort of professional in the mental health industry.

Oh, no. Not at all. Why would you make that assumption?
 
you SHOULD have had the ability to buy the land from another private person, meaning that the federal government shouldn't have been able to abscond property from the state or any other entity and declare it a federal park.

And who gets to decide who owns the land that I want to live on?
 
Except that the Supreme Court, in their capacity to engage in judicial review, has stated that no law or right in the Constitution is without limits. But we've been over that before.
and you apathetically accept that the supreme court can rewrite the constitution? pitiful.

I don't believe so. People who have lived in such a regime would be more likely to find other ways to change minds.
then they, and you, are fools.

I made absolutely no assumption or conclusion. It was a correlation. There's a vast difference. An inability to feel emotions like sympathy and empathy - an ability to connect with the situation or feelings of others - might lead to a lack of other emotions that connect with others, such as remorse or guilt. If we have no connection to others with at least some kind of emotional context, then the likelihood that we will "feel bad" for doing something to them is lessened.
you most assuredly did make an assumption based upon your lack of reading comprehension. I said I had none of those emotions for them. I did not say I do not feel those emotions at all.

I made no assumption as to whether or not you have violent tendencies. I asked a question. (Whether or not you have any violent offences on your criminal record is irrelevant, since one could have violent tendencies without being accused, charged, indicted or convicted.)
you most assuredly did assume, by asking the question based upon my wishes of death upon others.

Oh, no. Not at all. Why would you make that assumption?
no assumption here. just my relief that you're not in any position to determine the mental health status of people because you assume so much wrongful crap.
 
and you apathetically accept that the supreme court can rewrite the constitution? pitiful.

I don't accept anything apathetically. I accept that the Constitution includes a judicial branch which helps to define our laws, and there's nothing apathetic about that.

then they, and you, are fools.

Really? Do you then believe that one should become precisely what one escaped in order to force other to see things their way?

you most assuredly did make an assumption based upon your lack of reading comprehension. I said I had none of those emotions for them. I did not say I do not feel those emotions at all.

Nor did I. I said you seem to. That does not state categorically "you do not." Are you not capable of understanding these differences?

you most assuredly did assume, by asking the question based upon my wishes of death upon others.

And hence I asked a question. Asking a question about whether or not you do or do not do or have something is not stating or coming to a conclusion that you do. Subtleties again.

no assumption here.

You most assuredly did assume. By asking the question based upon my response.
 
hey govcum guzzling fucktard, stay on your knees because you're not done blowing obama yet.

Gee Wizz someone seems to have joined his stormfront pal right down to the childish ineffectual sexual expletives.
He says someone will bomb a government building now that Blue Tarp man has been shot. He is too much of a coward to leave his keyboard. Who will that someone be? You?

LOL
 
I love our federal parks, they are a treasure for all Americans. You would have them divided up and the lands held by private citizens instead of all Americans.
I am sorry, the majority of Americans love our federal parks, you and your bunch of rag tag militia are on the wrong side on this one.

That ragtag militia is going to hold up Finicum as a martyr now.
 
Back
Top