Buck: ‘I won’t support a convicted felon for the White House’

First it was if he broke laws he would be charged. Then it was he's innocent until proven guilty. When he is found guilty it will be bullshit, he was railroaded. The fucker could come out and say he was guilty and fuck all of you for prosecuting me and you would still vote for him.

First be hasn't been found guilty of anything. So I'm not sure what you're on about.

I will ask you like I've asked all you leftists and im STILL waiting for an answer, if trump is the repub nominee, who else should I vote for? Will you be the one in a thousand leftists who actually answers the question?
 
The PRA allows him to keep whatever he wants

In law there are specific laws and general laws

The courts have always said that specific laws override general laws

The PRA is specific because it only applies to the president while the espionage act applies to everyone

Also whenever there is a direct conflict between laws they always go with the most recent one

No the presidential records act does not excuse or allow the president to take classified documents home with him. You will learn eventually that Trump lies to his fucking ignorant followers.
 
Amazing that a judge ordered a search warant for documents he was legally allowed to have.
Tink makes up a lot of stuff. I can’t find any evidence that the Clinton tapes contained classified information, so I rule it to be another lie.
 
No the presidential records act does not excuse or allow the president to take classified documents home with him. You will learn eventually that Trump lies to his fucking ignorant followers.

This from a Brandon supporter ^^^^^^^^ the idiot wouldn't know the truth if it fucked him up the ass.
 
No, proof of intent is NOT required. Read the link I cited:

Under the law, prosecutors will not be required to prove that Mr Trump knew that the information he possessed could harm national security, but rather that any reasonable person would understand the harm it could do. They will instead focus on Mr Trump's efforts to retain the information, even after being given multiple opportunities to surrender it to authorities.
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...al-defenders-are-saying&p=5667565#post5667565


As for your post #12, the argument seems to be that there were many allegations against Trump but no indictments for seven years, which shows he was the victim of a witch hunt.

Now he has been indicted - twice in two months - and that shows he is the victim of a witch hunt.

Maybe we should agree that as long as the sun rises in the east, Trump is the victim of a witch hunt. :laugh:

no prosecutor would pursue charges unless they knew they could prove intent. If trump had turned them over he never would have been charged yet he still broke the law taking them.

Here we have the DoJ getting a search warant for them, having a grand jury unanomously vote to charge hime, the DoJ issues charges for 37 felonys yet trump didn't break any laws because a fucking Nazi trump dick sucker said so? I'll go with the professionals who have charged him.
 
Conviction and indictment arent the same thing you stupid clown. You're lying disingenuous motherfucker AKA a leftist. This is precisely why you people aren't worthy of any respect.

A conviction won't make any difference to assholes like you.
 
That's basically the plan right? Keep piling on accusations in the hope that people will jump ship from trump. Explain why you people have such a hard on for trump. Please don't use that he it above the law and democracy bullshit. Apparently everyone but you leftist know that you don't really give a fuck about any of that. So what's your addiction to this trump porn really all about?

The guy is a fucking criminal that should be hung for Jan 6th. He tried to overthrow our govt and install himself as leader yet you don't have a problem with that?
 
no prosecutor would pursue charges unless they knew they could prove intent. If trump had turned them over he never would have been charged yet he still broke the law taking them.

Here we have the DoJ getting a search warant for them, having a grand jury unanomously vote to charge hime, the DoJ issues charges for 37 felonys yet trump didn't break any laws because a fucking Nazi trump dick sucker said so? I'll go with the professionals who have charged him.

Yes he would have

The democrats are obsessed with getting him
 
First be hasn't been found guilty of anything. So I'm not sure what you're on about.

I will ask you like I've asked all you leftists and im STILL waiting for an answer, if trump is the repub nominee, who else should I vote for? Will you be the one in a thousand leftists who actually answers the question?

If trump is or isn't the nominee I think you should write his name in on the ballot just like all the rest of the Trump nazi's.
 
The guy is a fucking criminal that should be hung for Jan 6th. He tried to overthrow our govt and install himself as leader yet you don't have a problem with that?

I do have a problem with that the bigger problem is you maggots have yet to prove it but you state it all as if it's a fact. That's makes you a lying piece of shit. Trump at least doesn't hide what he is but you fuckers play pretend all fucking day long. Go lick your mother's balls.
 
If trump is or isn't the nominee I think you should write his name in on the ballot just like all the rest of the Trump nazi's.

It makes a huge difference if he is the nominee. That's the only condition under which id vote for him. Thats been true for me since day 1. I didn't vote for him in the last 2 primaries and I won't in this one either.
 
Me neither!

[FONT=&]Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) said he would not support a convicted felon for president, as former President Trump faces an arraignment on federal charges over his alleged mishandling of classified and sensitive documents after his administration ended.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Buck told CNN’s Dana Bash in an interview Tuesday that the public will need to see how the evidence for the case against Trump is presented and what Trump’s defense is, but he would not “feel comfortable” supporting someone who has been convicted of a felony for president.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]“If he is convicted of these charges of mishandling this information, of knowingly concealing his actions, I don’t think — I certainly won’t support a convicted felon for the White House,” he said.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Buck’s comment came before Trump made his first appearance in federal court in Miami, having been indicted on 37 counts related to his keeping classified and sensitive documents at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Palm Beach, Fla.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Most of the charges Trump is facing are for willful retention of national defense information in violation of the Espionage Act. Other counts he is facing include conspiracy to obstruct justice, concealing a document in a federal investigation and making false statements and representations.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]Republicans have been somewhat split in their reactions to Trump’s indictment in the days following the news that he would become the first former president to be charged with federal crimes. Some have criticized Trump’s conduct in allegedly keeping the documents in various places around Mar-a-Lago — including a bathroom — while others have accused the Justice Department of political motivation in going after Trump.
[/FONT]

[FONT=&]https://www.yahoo.com/news/buck-won-t-support-convicted-184650143.html

[/FONT]
f6728d13cb75edb1601692202ae2e7d0.jpg

Trump didn't conceal anything. There is no perjury. He never obstructed justice. Trump is not convicted. There was no espionage.

Biden, however, DID conceal documents he was not allowed to even view for YEARS, didn't turn them in until he was caught with them, ignores the law and the Constitution, and opened the opportunity for espionage through his son, Cocaine Hunter, who had access to those documents while he traveling to Ukraine and China on 'family business'.
 
Back
Top