BREAKING Trump Issues Immediate Declassification Order of Carter Page FISA Docs

archives said:
Wait a minute, that is nineteen pages out of FISA documents that number in the hundreds, and, only text messages of certain individuals, he is not releasing the entire documents, rather, selective release, actually targeted releases, beginning to sound like another Nunes memo

And bottom line, means nothing other than the further perpetuation of right wing innuendos and conspiracies, the majority of which has hit their point of marginal utility a long time ago
Click to expand...

The "redacted" lines are the only lines being declassified. If there is any targeting....that was accomplished when these lines were REDACTED in the first place. ;) If there is nothing there...what's to fear? LMAO:bigthink:
 
blackascoal said:
36 indictments, 6 guilty pleas .. and counting.

Trump has the lowest approval in history .. during a good economy.

More than half the country thinks he's a liar, and half the country thinks he's a racist.

Republicans are going to lose between 40-60 seats in the House, and quite possibly the Senate.

Republicans and republican donors have left, or are leaving the party .. and the Republican Party continues to shrink.

Maybe you should read about that.
Click to expand...

Obama lost over 1,000 legislative seats while in office
 
anatta said:
asked and answered.The FISA doesn't "support or not support" Trump.
The FISA is the supposed probable cause ( FISA warrant) of Russian collusion.

Trump hasn't interfered in the Mueller investigation either - except for calling it what it is; a witch hunt.
Trump is allow to critique it, but not interfere in it.

This is not Mueller, this is the Strzok led FBI counterintelligence investigation.
But Mueller subsumed that, and Mueler was appointed because of the political noise surrounding
the leaking of that investigation details
Click to expand...

The lefties are a little touchy when it comes to the Sacred Inquisition lol.

This is remarkable because it’s represents Trump’s first actual *action* with regards to Mullet’s investigation. Or more specifically, as you pointed out—the origin of the Russian investigation. Until now, Trump has done nothing but Tweet about it.

And he will be Tweeting about it more in the coming weeks.

One of the reason the media hates that prospect is because it forces them to talk about things they don’t want to. They are more than happy to fact check Trump when he gets a fact wrong about the economy or whatever. Not so much, when the topic is ‘strategic leak campaigns’ by people high up in the IC.

I can see Trump leaning back in his WH chair and thinking to himself ‘fact check me now, bitches’ lol. I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if he isn’t gaming this whole thing—keep in mind Trump knows more than anyone about what he’s guilty or not guilty of.

At any rate, this is a big story but it’s getting crowded out by the accusations against Kavanaugh. I expect that will change once ‘Trump’s strategic leak campaign’ kicks in.

So stay tuned.
 
archives said:
No, that was yesterday's conspiracy, but the special prosecutor wasn't appointed to investigate Trump or his campaign, as you know the memo read to investigate Russian interference in the election. Trump's campaign was a secondary concern, and the intent there was not to directly investigate the campaign but rather to see if there was any connection between Russian espionage efforts and the Trump campaign

If the prior nine months, which was the last two days feeding for the right wing media, were about collusion, which would be weird since collusion isn't even a crime, and since most of that claim was again based upon again two people's personal Emails, it wasn't about investigating the totality of Russia's efforts. For that, Mueller was appointed
Click to expand...

No, counterintelligence isn’t the job of federal prosecutors—even ‘special’ ones.

Russian collusion was a pretext to appoint an SP to do a crime search on Trump. And that could hardly be any more clear to anyone not ideologically invested in getting rid of Trump. Strzok and Lisa Page were over the investigation and both are on record as saying there was nothing to it, prior to, the appointment of Mullet.

And those are facts the Left needs to start contending with.

They knew they couldn’t get away with appointing an SP to do straight-up counterintelligence: they needed the prospect of a criminal element for that. So what did they do? They went on a ‘strategic leak campaign’ to stoke the Trump/Russia narrative; parts of the media were more than happy to play along—in fact, I would go as far as to call them complicit. Carter Page was just the unlucky tool—the man is totally innocent. If I were him I would get busy suing some people.

And when Trump fired Comey, Comey leaked his memo ‘with the hope an SP would be appointed’ and the trap was sprung. The Strzok/Page/DOJ ‘strategic leak campaign’ was going on in April 2017 and Mullet was appointed to take over the ‘counterintelligence’ investigation in May 2017.

Then Trump/Russian collusion was jettisoned because it was no longer needed.
 
archives said:
Wait a minute, that is nineteen pages out of FISA documents that number in the hundreds, and, only text messages of certain individuals, he is not releasing the entire documents, rather, selective release, actually targeted releases, beginning to sound like another Nunes memo

And bottom line, means nothing other than the further perpetuation of right wing innuendos and conspiracies, the majority of which has hit their point of marginal utility a long time ago
Click to expand...

You sound scared.
 
Darth Omar said:
No, counterintelligence isn’t the job of federal prosecutors—even ‘special’ ones.

Russian collusion was a pretext to appoint an SP to do a crime search on Trump. And that could hardly be any more clear to anyone not ideologically invested in getting rid of Trump. Strzok and Lisa Page were over the investigation and both are on record as saying there was nothing to it, prior to, the appointment of Mullet.

And those are facts the Left needs to start contending with.

They knew they couldn’t get away with appointing an SP to do straight-up counterintelligence: they needed the prospect of a criminal element for that. So what did they do? They went on a ‘strategic leak campaign’ to stoke the Trump/Russia narrative; parts of the media were more than happy to play along—in fact, I would go as far as to call them complicit. Carter Page was just the unlucky tool—the man is totally innocent. If I were him I would get busy suing some people.

And when Trump fired Comey, Comey leaked his memo ‘with the hope an SP would be appointed’ and the trap was sprung. The Strzok/Page/DOJ ‘strategic leak campaign’ was going on in April 2017 and Mullet was appointed to take over the ‘counterintelligence’ investigation in May 2017.

Then Trump/Russian collusion was jettisoned because it was no longer needed.
Click to expand...
Page has filed a few lawsuits to clear his name. he only wants $1 in damages.

The puppeteers have already been exposed. were are supposed to see some exculpatory evidence
that they didn't put in the FISA ap.
 
anatta said:
Page has filed a few lawsuits to clear his name. he only wants $1 in damages.

The puppeteers have already been exposed. were are supposed to see some exculpatory evidence
that they didn't put in the FISA ap.
Click to expand...

I think he may be rethinking the $1 bit.

I sure as hell would. In a related issue, I think Mullet keeps delaying Flynn’s sentencing in order to keep him quiet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top