Breaking News.....the Russians COULD NOT HAVE INFLUENCED THE ELECTION

T

TheDonald

Banned
Yup it's true, it is impossible for the Russians to have influenced the last election because of the electoral college. Simple really, see you did not vote, or your votes meant nothing because Trump was elected by the electoral college, not the people. Why? this was designed to prohibit tampering and it worked wonderfully.

Thanks George...................

Next
 
TheDonald said:
Yup it's true, it is impossible for the Russians to have influenced the last election because of the electoral college. Simple really, see you did not vote, or your votes meant nothing because Trump was elected by the electoral college, not the people. Why? this was designed to prohibit tampering and it worked wonderfully.

Thanks George...................

Next
Click to expand...

Nothing to say huh kids...........................imagine that Hillary lovers being silent.
 
Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook will be handing over the contents of 3,000 ads purchased by ‘inauthentic accounts’ from the social media giant prior to the 2016 election, which Facebook attributed to a Russian ‘troll farm’ .

Facebook claimed in early September over $100,000 worth of ads were sold to a “Russian bot farm” – most of which were purchased in 2015 and did not appear to favor any particular candidate, according to the company.

Of note:

The vast majority of ads run by these accounts didn’t specifically reference the US presidential election, voting or a particular candidate.

Rather, the ads and accounts appeared to focus on amplifying divisive social and political messages across the ideological spectrum — touching on topics from LGBTP matters to race issues to immigration to gun rights.

About one-quarter of these ads were geographically targeted, and of those, more ran in 2015 than 2016.

DEMOCRATS, in turn, will surely demand that Facebook keep a short leash on opinions they deem to be “hateful,” or “discriminatory,” leading into the 2018 midterm elections and of course, the 2020 Presidential race.



http://ibankcoin.com/zeropointnow/2017/09/21/facebook-to-turn-over-3000-russian-troll-farm-ads-to-congress/#sthash.KXxULMvY.dpbs
 
Good point about the electoral college being a bulwark against outside tampering.

Nobody outside the left buys the 'Russians stole the election' bit, anyway lol. It's idiotic. The factors that influenced the last election were myriad---I don't even know if I can list them all.

To whatever extent Putin affected the election, it was easily cancelled out by the media journalists/political activists pulling for Hillary. In fact, THAT, and not Muh Russia, is the threat to democracy. CNN alone was a bigger factor than Russia in the last election.

As the old gaffer would say 'it's bullshit'.
 
Darth Omar said:
Good point about the electoral college being a bulwark against outside tampering.

Nobody outside the left buys the 'Russians stole the election' bit, anyway lol. It's idiotic. The factors that influenced the last election were myriad---I don't even know if I can list them all.

To whatever extent Putin affected the election, it was easily cancelled out by the media journalists/political activists pulling for Hillary. In fact, THAT, and not Muh Russia, is the threat to democracy. CNN alone was a bigger factor than Russia in the last election.

As the old gaffer would say 'it's bullshit'.
Click to expand...
it's bullshit! (said by old gaffer)
 
Scaled cat said:
Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook will be handing over the contents of 3,000 ads purchased by ‘inauthentic accounts’ from the social media giant prior to the 2016 election, which Facebook attributed to a Russian ‘troll farm’ .

Facebook claimed in early September over $100,000 worth of ads were sold to a “Russian bot farm” – most of which were purchased in 2015 and did not appear to favor any particular candidate, according to the company.

Of note:

The vast majority of ads run by these accounts didn’t specifically reference the US presidential election, voting or a particular candidate.

Rather, the ads and accounts appeared to focus on amplifying divisive social and political messages across the ideological spectrum — touching on topics from LGBTP matters to race issues to immigration to gun rights.

About one-quarter of these ads were geographically targeted, and of those, more ran in 2015 than 2016.

DEMOCRATS, in turn, will surely demand that Facebook keep a short leash on opinions they deem to be “hateful,” or “discriminatory,” leading into the 2018 midterm elections and of course, the 2020 Presidential race.



http://ibankcoin.com/zeropointnow/2017/09/21/facebook-to-turn-over-3000-russian-troll-farm-ads-to-congress/#sthash.KXxULMvY.dpbs
Click to expand...

100 K.....do you realize just how much money the DNC spent attempting to place Queen Bitch on the throne? 11 Billion dollars. And 100K is going to influence and offset 11 Billion? That is if anyone can explain how contributing to a campaign in a covert fashion is worthy of kicking a duly elected president out of office. If that's the case...why did the left ignore Obama's campaign contributions from the internet as his campaign received 110 Million from internet contributions from around the world on the world wide web?

And do you know what Hillary's 11 Billion was spent on? Accusing Donald Trump of sexual deviancy with no objective testable evidence ever presented.

This is how RUSSIA won the election for Trump? Laugh My Ass Off. And the funny thing? The fake media attempted to claim that TRUMP spent as much as Hillary because of the "free" advertising they gave him while attacking him. Claiming there is no such thing as Bad Press. Any excuse is ok I guess. I tripped over a rock, the sun was in my eyes, or THE RUSSIANS DID IT. In reality....not counting the ATTACK ADS by the fake press on Donald Trump...Hillary personally spent 3.4 billion OFFICIALLY....more than tripling the 3/4 billion spent by Obama....and she still lost. Why? Because Trump played both Hillary/DNC and the press like cheap fiddles.
 
Last edited:
TheDonald said:
Yup it's true, it is impossible for the Russians to have influenced the last election because of the electoral college. Simple really, see you did not vote, or your votes meant nothing because Trump was elected by the electoral college, not the people. Why? this was designed to prohibit tampering and it worked wonderfully.

Thanks George...................

Next
Click to expand...

Typical simpleton right-wing drooler bullshit.

If enough people in the right voting districts are influenced by a propaganda source, it could cause an entire state to go to one candidate over the other and hence, affect the electoral outcome.

The 2016 freak occurrence is a perfect example.

The reason we've got a ridiculous TV clown for a President that the entire world is laughing at us for, rather than a serious, sober and respectable former FLOTUS, US Senator and Secretary of State, is because of 77,000 idiots in three upper Midwest states who let that Russian sponsored email side show influence their voting decision.

To claim the Electoral College is some kind of buffer against the influence of foreign meddling shows a basic, fundamental lack of understanding of how the system works.

It also indicates that you should probably stick to posting in some video gamer or NASCAR racing forum rather than one where politics is discussed.

Next...
 
Had this happened during the Obama administration and Russia had tries to influence the election in his favor, would your reaction have been the same? You have absolutely no idea how much influence the Russians may have had on this election, and even if it was minor you should be really pissed as an American citizen that a foreign power would tamper with our election. maybe you just aren't an American.
 
floridafan said:
Had this happened during the Obama administration and Russia had tries to influence the election in his favor, would your reaction have been the same? You have absolutely no idea how much influence the Russians may have had on this election, and even if it was minor you should be really pissed as an American citizen that a foreign power would tamper with our election. maybe you just aren't an American.
Click to expand...

Are you (sock) claiming that you are not an American patriot because YOU failed to care about Obama's collusion with foreign nations or did not care that Obama received over 100 Million in internet contributions from his Muslim Brotherhood in the middle east? Just what are you saying? If it does not fit you must acquit? This is typical of a leftist....accusing others of what they are guilty of doing. And its objective evidence as its in your own words. You bitch and complain others using the media source known as the net in a fake manner, but you post like hell pretending to be someone other than who you are....a left wing enabler of propaganda.

Historical Truth? The democrat party has always been a Fascist Party....the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, anti-civil rights....yet you now accuse your opposition of those things that your party has done in an undeniable documented historical fashion? Really? Did you know that Hitler mirrored his laws concerning Jews and anti-Semitism from the Jim Crow laws enacted by the DNC and their hatred of Blacks? Or that Hitler was JFK's hero during the 30s?
 
Last edited:
I don't mind having a discussion with you, but stop lying! What collusion did Obama have with foreign nations?Would you document this 100 million in donations from foreign individuals? Is there anything you won't do or say to try and make Trumps current situation into something that is no big deal, something run of the mill.
 
floridafan said:
I don't mind having a discussion with you, but stop lying! What collusion did Obama have with foreign nations?Would you document this 100 million in donations from foreign individuals? Is there anything you won't do or say to try and make Trumps current situation into something that is no big deal, something run of the mill.
Click to expand...

Lying? Prove that anything presented is a LIE. You will not because you cannot, its all documented, testable and objective. Unlike your "subjective" and biased/bigoted BS.
 
floridafan said:
If its documented post it or maybe a link- like this one

Saudis And The UAE Will Donate $100 Million To A Fund Inspired By Ivanka Trump

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...00-million-to-a-fund-inspired-by-ivanka-trump
Click to expand...

Oh! the humanity: You have overwhelmed me with all the evidence presented that proves the democrats don't have a history filled with fascism, I can't process the multitude of evidences that you have presented by presenting a left wing hack's (you) charge that its OK because another person did the same thing. Again, typical of a leftist that can't defend the position they have taken, its called Parallel Morality....excusing YOUR immorality by presenting a supposed act of immorality by another.

Did you read the article you presented? Clearly you did not.....this article has nothing to do with campaign contributions but a fund established to help women across the world fund their business dreams. Are you now claiming that you are an anti-feminist? :palm:

What you did is obvious. You searched the web (because you are ignorant and have no personal aptitude for critical independent thinking or reasoning, thus you stand on the shoulders of others pretending that you are somehow intelligent, Kinda reminds one of Dommer...no?) for anything negative against the Trump family and bingo you attempted to apply your own charges to a completely different subject matter. In other words you LIED. There are two types of lies. Lies committed through co-mission and lies committed through omission. You simply overlooked the fact that the Saudi's were helping fund a bank account that was to be used to support women in their quest to become business owners. Right...err....left? And this supposed illegal funding helped the Russians make Trump president....AFTER he was already elected? May 2017.

I suggest you go back to the web and find some left wing revised history site. At least pretend that you did some research in the attempt to defend the lies you present.
 
Last edited:
I am still waiting for your proof for your link, honey bunch. So far all we have is a whole lot of bullshyte and a woman who doesn't know what fascism is.
 
floridafan said:
I am still waiting for your proof for your link, honey bunch. So far all we have is a whole lot of bullshyte and a woman who doesn't know what fascism is.
Click to expand...

Right....I am supposed to do your leg work in proving that the democrats don't have a history of fascism? Its your charges (they don't have a history of Jim Crow, KKK, Anti civil rights voting..etc.) ...you prosecute them. You will not because you cannot. Laugh My Ass Off. I am supposed to prove YOUR NEGATIVE? Another left wing ploy...because you can't defend the LIES you have presented. Again.....explain how the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office.

DEFLECTION: The act of attempting to deflect your argument to another because the original argument can't be defended.
 
Did Crooked Hillary get any $ from foreign donors before the election?

Let's see...


Recent donors include the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany and a Canadian government agency promoting the Keystone XL pipeline. . . .

United Arab Emirates, a first-time donor, gave between $1 million and $5 million in 2014, and the German government—which also hadn't previously given—contributed between $100,000 and $250,000.

A previous donor, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, has given between $10 million and $25 million since the foundation was created in 1999. Part of that came in 2014, although the database doesn't specify how much.

The Australian government has given between $5 million and $10 million, at least part of which came in 2014. It also gave in 2013, when its donations fell in the same range.

Qatar’s government committee preparing for the 2022 soccer World Cup gave between $250,000 and $500,000 in 2014. Qatar’s government had previously donated between $1 million and $5 million.

Oman, which had made a donation previously, gave an undisclosed amount in 2014. Over time, Oman has given the foundation between $1 million and $5 million. Prior to last year, its donations fell in the same range.

The foundation of course provides luxury travel for Hillary Clinton and her spouse, a high-visibility platform and access to mega-donors. She is beholden in a meaningful sense to its donors. No presidential candidate can justify a conflict of interest of this magnitude; it is not merely the appearance of conflict but actual conflict of interest.

It is bad enough when Clinton takes gobs of money in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, oil and chemical companies, and other titans of industry — although that, too, raises the potential for conflicts of interest.

A foreign government should never have any claim on the loyalty of a U.S. president, which is why foreign donations directly to a campaign are illegal. We cannot give her a pass simply because her entity is a “foundation,” not a PAC or campaign entity.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2015/02/18/foreign-donations-to-hillary-clintons-foundation-raise-major-ethical-questions/?utm_term=.fa254c9e7c8a
 
Oh, my.


It was supposed to be a carefully planned anniversary to mark one of the most widely praised moments in Hillary Rodham Clinton’s political career — and to remind the country, ahead of a 2016 presidential campaign, about her record as a champion for the rights of women and girls.

Instead, she finds herself under attack for her acceptance of millions of dollars in donations from Middle Eastern countries known for violence against women and for denying them many basic freedoms.



https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/09/us/politics/hillary-clinton-faces-test-of-record-aiding-women.html
 
Oh, dear.


The Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West.

The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the story involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men who have been major donors to former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

The sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a number of United States government agencies.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, records show a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million.

Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html
 
"explain how the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office"

Its called buying influence honey pot, just like what you accused Mrs Clinton of with donations to her charity. As usual you are completely FOS. NOW, document the $100 million you accused Obama of accepting. You know you can't because it never happened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top