Breaking News : Epstein Files

[CBHype]

Not if he is telling the truth.

Lawyers have their way with 'truth".

 

[Jarod]

Lawyers have their way with 'truth".

Facts are facts, if he says, "John Smith is mentioned in the Epestine files", its pretty easy to verify.

 

[Number Six]

Magats are nervous that Trump is going to exposed as a pedophile yet again.

 

[CBHype]

Facts are facts, if he says, "John Smith is mentioned in the Epestine files", its pretty easy to verify.

Mentioned does not necessarily mean guilty of a crime. Lawyers will have a field day with this. You are naive.

 

[Yakuda]

Lawyers have their way with 'truth".

This is correct. Lawyers only care about what looks true not what what's actually true.

 

[CBHype]

This is correct. Lawyers only care about what looks true not what what's actually true.

The apparence of guilt does not necessarily mean guilt in the end.

 

[Yakuda]

Mentioned does not necessarily mean guilty of a crime. Lawyers will have a field day with this. You are naive.

It's worse than naive Jarod is a unicorn lawyer.....imaginary

 

[Yakuda]

The apparence of guilt does not necessarily mean guilt in the end.

Agreed. Some other leftist idiot started a thread saying Trump was mentioned over 38,000 times in the Epstein files which is more often than Jesus is mentioned in the bible. The dimwit thinks that means guilty.

 

[Jarod]

Mentioned does not necessarily mean guilty of a crime. Lawyers will have a field day with this. You are naive.

One is always free to state facts without repercussions. Check the first Amendment.

If he says, "John Smith is guilty of a crime", and that is not true, then he would likely face a lawsuit.

 

[Jarod]

Agreed. Some other leftist idiot started a thread saying Trump was mentioned over 38,000 times in the Epstein files which is more often than Jesus is mentioned in the bible. The dimwit thinks that means guilty.

Are you kidding, how many of you have convicted Clinton because his name is in the files?

 

[Yakuda]

Are you kidding, how many of you have convicted Clinton because his name is in the files?

Cite where I convicted Clinton. Oh that's right you won't because you can't and I didn't.

 

[Yakuda]

Are you kidding, how many of you have convicted Clinton because his name is in the files?

I can almost hear you mangled donuts now if trump was getting hummers from an intern in the oval office

 

[Number Six]

I can almost hear you mangled donuts now if trump was getting hummers from an intern in the oval office

But it fine for him to get them from children as indicated in the files. Fucking disgusting

 

[Jarod]

Cite where I convicted Clinton. Oh that's right you won't because you can't and I didn't.

Did I say you Convicted Clinton?

 

[Jarod]

I can almost hear you mangled donuts now if trump was getting hummers from an intern in the oval office

Underage? Nope.

 

[Yakuda]

But it fine for him to get them from children as indicated in the files. Fucking disgusting

You have to prove that but it's clear you're a screeching schill

 

[Yakuda]

Did I say you Convicted Clinton?

You said how many of you ...I'm me not one of many

 

[Number Six]

You have to prove that but it's clear you're a screeching schill

You refuse to look at what has been released. Not my problem. Support such a person if u so wish.

 

[Jarod]

You said how many of you ...I'm me not one of many

Ok

 

[Yakuda]

Underage? Nope.

Fuck you if that was trump you're need would spin around. Prove he did with underage girls