Box Office: ‘Melania’ Heads for $8 Million Opening, the Best Showing in a Decade for a Doc

ThatOwlWoman said:
When desperate to defend the indefensible, she often forgets the rules.

Guess we'll see if there really is such a thing here as the fabled "two sets of rules." It's definitely not the first time she's posted huge blocks of someone else's work without a link or credit to the author. I believe @Damocles has warned her a couple of times, if not more.
Click to expand...
Well, I don't want her gone as much as I want her to start actually speaking to people she disagrees with. It takes courage - it does - but that'll be the first step.

I think what it comes down to is fear of finding out everything you've been believing is a lie.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Into what? Just another Reichwing grift? lol
Click to expand...
LOL - no. I am not against organizations that promote what they believe in - as long as what they believe in isn't to bully vulnerable people. If they want to promote Christianity, gun rights, small government, freedom of religion, even anti-abortion efforts, as long as they're done in a civilized manner, etc.? Knock yourself out. What will bother me is if she hires a "mouthpiece" like Charlie and they go on to continue as Charlie did with her in some background role.

No - it's about time a woman took control of a MAGA organization, becomes the face of it and reforms it.

This is what I'm hoping for.
 
LurchAddams said:
Well, I don't want her gone as much as I want her to start actually speaking to people she disagrees with. It takes courage - it does - but that'll be the first step.

I think what it comes down to is fear of finding out everything you've been believing is a lie.
Click to expand...

There is no way she or any other MAGAT will ever acknowledge that last bit, my dear. But it's good to have hope, I suppose.

As far as not quoting when replying to people on this discussion forum, it's her passive-aggressive way of pretending that those people are not worthy of having her directly quote them. In other words, it's a loser's way of trying to diminish others in order to inflate herself. She seems incapable of realizing that doing this just makes her look unhinged, as well as too lazy to properly use the forum's features. Anyone popping in here and scrolling through a spirited discussion and seeing her bizarre comments unconnected to anything gets the impression that her egg is cracked. lol
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
There is no way she or any other MAGAT will ever acknowledge that last bit, my dear. But it's good to have hope, I suppose.

As far as not quoting when replying to people on this discussion forum, it's her passive-aggressive way of pretending that those people are not worthy of having her directly quote them. In other words, it's a loser's way of trying to diminish others in order to inflate herself. She seems incapable of realizing that doing this just makes her look unhinged, as well as too lazy to properly use the forum's features. Anyone popping in here and scrolling through a spirited discussion and seeing her bizarre comments unconnected to anything gets the impression that her egg is cracked. lol
Click to expand...
^^^^WARNING STALKER ALERT!!!^^^^
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
There is no way she or any other MAGAT will ever acknowledge that last bit, my dear. But it's good to have hope, I suppose.

As far as not quoting when replying to people on this discussion forum, it's her passive-aggressive way of pretending that those people are not worthy of having her directly quote them. In other words, it's a loser's way of trying to diminish others in order to inflate herself. She seems incapable of realizing that doing this just makes her look unhinged, as well as too lazy to properly use the forum's features. Anyone popping in here and scrolling through a spirited discussion and seeing her bizarre comments unconnected to anything gets the impression that her egg is cracked. lol
Click to expand...
Gotta go ahead and disagree slightly with you there, my friend. Yes it's classic passive aggressive behavior. But with her I honestly believe she wants us to THINK her not responding to us directly is because we're "not worthy". What it truly is is fear of engaging directly because then it's harder to "run away" which is precisely what she does when she realizes she's lost the argument.

So in conclusion: it's not arrogance. It's fear.
 
LurchAddams said:
LOL - no. I am not against organizations that promote what they believe in - as long as what they believe in isn't to bully vulnerable people. If they want to promote Christianity, gun rights, small government, freedom of religion, even anti-abortion efforts, as long as they're done in a civilized manner, etc.? Knock yourself out. What will bother me is if she hires a "mouthpiece" like Charlie and they go on to continue as Charlie did with her in some background role.

No - it's about time a woman took control of a MAGA organization, becomes the face of it and reforms it.

This is what I'm hoping for.
Click to expand...

You're such a delightful optimist. I don't see it happening though. Not for lack of trying or sincerity on her part. But that's not what RW fans and especially donors want in a RW organization. They want what they've been fed for years by the likes of Limbaugh, Beck, Jones, Trump, Coulter, Fox, Kirk, etc. -- fear, hate, xenophobia, homophobia, misogyny, white supremacy. Understanding, open dialogue, compromise, empathy are not on the Reichwing's radar.
 
LurchAddams said:
Gotta go ahead and disagree slightly with you there, my friend. Yes it's classic passive aggressive behavior. But with her I honestly believe she wants us to THINK her not responding to us directly is because we're "not worthy". What it truly is is fear of engaging directly because then it's harder to "run away" which is precisely what she does when she realizes she's lost the argument.

So in conclusion: it's not arrogance. It's fear.
Click to expand...
Agreed fear is the main driver of passive-aggressive behavior.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top