Border agents/conservative thugs pwned by supreme court

[FUCK THE POLICE]

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/3/23/23300/4673

Supreme Court Lets Border Agents' Convictions Stand
By Jeralyn, Section Supreme Court
Posted on Mon Mar 23, 2009 at 10:30:00 PM ESTdit

Border Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean lost their bid to have the Supreme Court review their convictions for shooting an unarmed drug smuggler and lying about it.

The agents, already out of prison due to their ten-plus year sentences being commuted to two years by former President Bush, no doubt will be disappointed. I'm not. What's shocking about this case is that some people believe suspected drug dealers from Mexico inevitably deserve to be shot and that it's okay for law enforcement agents to shoot an unarmed suspect who is running away.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

of course it's ok.

 

[Damocles]

Watermark, if you were convicted on such spurious evidence I'd fight in your favor.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

of course it's ok.

It's only OK if the person in question is a piece of subhuman conservative scum. But what evidence did we have that he was a conservative? None.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

it's important to shoot them otherwise all people have to do is just start running when they get to our border. I would compromise and have them not to shoot to kill though.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

it's important to shoot them otherwise all people have to do is just start running when they get to our border. I would compromise and have them not to shoot to kill though.

But there's already a policy in place not to shoot unless it's a violent or otherwise dangerous suspect, and illegals don't do just run when they get to the border.

And if you specifically had them shoot NOT to shoot to kill then everyone would know that and just run anyway. Better safe than sorry.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

If I knew I could get shot in the arm or the balls I would probably not take my chances.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

If I knew I could get shot in the arm or the balls I would probably not take my chances.

If you pull out a gun and intend to shoot you're always supposed to shoot to kill.

 

[FUCK THE POLICE]

Although that's usually because you're only supposed to use a gun on a violent fleeing suspect or someone who's threatening your life, and you'd want them down in the quickest way possible. If you're using it an a non-violent, non-threatening suspect, then feel free to experiment with your shots.

 

[Epicurus]

Although that's usually because you're only supposed to use a gun on a violent fleeing suspect or someone who's threatening your life, and you'd want them down in the quickest way possible. If you're using it an a non-violent, non-threatening suspect, then feel free to experiment with your shots.

Though it does beg the question why you are shooting at that person in the first place, then.