LOL Look again at when NAFTA was ratified. If Clinton had added so much protection, why did so many manufacturing jobs float south of the border within a few years of the treaty? Why did so many lumber jobs float north of the border to Canada - which hit Montana quite hard.
Fact is Clinton did far more than simply agree to pursue NAFTA if elected. He was full blown in support of it from the get-go. And NAFTA is not the only trade agreement signed under Clinton. Try looking at the histories of SAFTA (1995) and CEMAC (1999). Are you going to claim those were republican inventions, only brought to being by Clinton?
And while most (but not all) democratic senators voted against NAFTA, the majority was not huge. Try to remember, 1993 dems still controlled congress. It was relatively early in Clinton's administration, and he still had them eating out of his hand. So much for you memory of events. (ie: selective so you don't have to acknowledge the fuckups of your beloved donkeys.) And I won't even mention your complete ignorance of congressional involvement with treaty negotiations - which is little to none. They ratify. A few on certain committees may have some input, but the majority of negotiations is an executive power. (try reading the Consitution. It is very clear.) Amazing what happens to real thought when one wears a donkeys ass for head gear.