Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Quote Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
1. If you talk the same BS as one, and defend such with convoluted, revisionist clap trap, then what else am I to think?
2. I didn't "narrow" anything, genius....I acknowledged the additional point of information...which DOES NOT CHANGE the core of my point.
3. Please re-read the chronology of the posts to see what has transpired between myself and others. I grasp no straws, I just pluck the hairs that my opponents try to split to bolster their erroneous statements. Several of you make the same incorrect statements and assertions as to what has transpired. If you can logically and factually make your case (how and when I made generalizations about black folk in America) with this latest assertion (using post numbers), then do so. Otherwise, quit.
What exactly did I say, in my words, that gave you the impression that I am part "the right wing"? This ought to be good.
You must be a white American. Your original assertion was that blacks are black because they're black. Then you decided to mean that black Americans are black because they're black. You're welcome to go back and read what you wrote.
I might get around to reading all 30 pages of this thread but not now.
You might stop just trying to blow smoke up everyone's butt with this lame ass stall tactic, because you seem to have plenty of time for your gauntlet pick up for the other right wing idiots here, but suddenly finding a post that conclusively proves theirs/yours accusations and assertions is just too much.

Now, you'll do the usual right wing two step....state a detour accusation while avoiding a burden of proof of YOUR initial assertion. If I don't go down that path, why absolution and victory for you and your fellow flunkies.
Pathetic.
Say goodnight Gracie