Yet here you are, repeatedly refusing to discuss the topic.
Blaming the victim?
- Thread starter Big Money
- Start date
Yet here you are, repeatedly refusing to discuss the topic.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
She must have used her white privilege to force them to do what they've admitted to.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
I thought it was the DEFENSE that was saying that the daughter said this?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
You mean like you have on this thread? You have spent most of the time trying to make it about me, rather than discussing an actual issue.
Read the rules?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
Yes I did. Of course, that was several years ago. If you have some idea that I am breaking a rule, then say so.
We've been over this, haven't we? Why not admit you haven't read the rules again even though I gave you ample time?
Canceled.2014.1
New member
You didn't GIVE me anything. I read the rules a long time ago. If you think I am willfully breaking a rule then point it out. It could have been simple, but you choose to draw it out looking for some "gotcha".
I see you are fading back to your old ways again.
Canceled.2014.1
New member
I pointed out that you were very selective in what you posted, to make it seem more outrageous.
You alleged that I was selected, when in fact you have no basis for inferring motive.
I was following the forum rule.
Canceled.2014.1
New member
You purposefully avoided posting any of the portions of the article that showed the mother in a bad light.
Canceled.2014.1
New member
You posted the first paragraph (which stated the mother was being blamed by the defense) and then skipped over the next 2 paragraphs (which explained why the defense was making that claim) and then elected to post info about the jury selection (which had little bearing on the topic of the thread).
There is no need to post the entire article, but selectively picking only certain sentences is probably not what they had in mind.
And the rules also say post a link. By resizing the internet addy, you make it no longer function as a link.
Canceled.2014.1
New member
The rule to which you refer states: "Proper format is to post the first few paragraphs and then link to the article for the rest."
The second and third paragraphs state some of the reasons the defense is making the claims they are. You chose to post the first paragraph, then skip the second and third, then posted paragraphs rom on into the article. I contend that you were being deliberately misleading.
The second and third paragraphs state some of the reasons the defense is making the claims they are. You chose to post the first paragraph, then skip the second and third, then posted paragraphs rom on into the article. I contend that you were being deliberately misleading.
Canceled.2014.1
New member
So little gets proven.
Canceled.2014.1
New member
You would have to ask one of those "some". I have no idea. Do you?
OK, I'll wait.