Blacks selling black people to blacks

Yaya said:
Happening in Africa right now.
Click to expand...

I doubt there was ever a time it was not happening to one degree or another.

Africans captured other Africans and sold them to the European slave traders hundreds of years ago. But that was hundreds of years ago. This country fought a bloody civil war to end it.
 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/worl...llar400/ar-BBEWrqx?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartandhp


its happenig in lybia



Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- "Eight hundred," says the auctioneer. "900 ... 1,000 ... 1,100 ..." Sold. For 1,200 Libyan dinars -- the equivalent of $800.
Not a used car, a piece of land, or an item of furniture. Not "merchandise" at all, but two human beings.
One of the unidentified men being sold in the grainy cell phone video obtained by CNN is Nigerian. He appears to be in his twenties and is wearing a pale shirt and sweatpants.
 
lybians are berbers



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_history_of_North_Africa


The genetic history of North Africa has been heavily influenced by geography. The Sahara desert to the south and the Mediterranean Sea to the North were important barriers to gene flow in prehistoric times. However, Northeast Africa and the Levant form a single land mass at the Suez. At the Straits of Gibraltar, North Africa and Europe are separated by only 15*km (9*mi). At periods of low sea-levels, such as during a glacial maximum, islands that are currently submerged would appear in the Mediterranean and possibly in between the Gibraltar straits.[citation needed]
These may have encouraged humans to "island hop" between Africa and Europe. During wetter phases of the Sahara, some Saharan inhabitants would have expanded north into southern parts of North Africa. West Asian populations would have also been attracted to a wet Sahara. West Asian populations could also migrate into Africa via the coastal regions of the Mediterranean.
As a result of these geographic influences, the genetic profile of North African populations is a complex mosaic of autochthonous Maghrebi, European, West Asian and Sub-Saharan African influences in variable degrees. Although North Africa has experienced gene-flow from the surrounding regions, it has also experienced long periods of genetic isolation in some parts, allowing a distinctive genetic marker to evolve in native Maghrebi (Tamazgha) populations, especially in the regions that are still predominantly Berber-speaking.
 
Darth Omar said:
This country fought a bloody civil war to end it.
Click to expand...

The Civil War was NOT fought to free the slaves, you ignorant fool. How could it be when

1. There were four UNION states that practiced slavery throughout the war. KY MD MO DE. Had 300,000 slaves total.

2. There were many UNION generals who were slave owners. Even Grant had a slave and his wife had a bunch of them.

3. Lincoln asked slave owner Robert E Lee to be commander of all UNION forces.

The idea that the CW was about freeing the slaves is not only wrong, it is preposterous. It's fake news the media has been feeding us for 150 years.
 
berbers selling mimigrants who are trying to escape horrible things in Isis ocuppied areas.


they cant be moved on so the assholes are selling them


makes you evil shits giddy huh


they are Berbers


the people they are selling are mostly Africans
 
these people are berbers asshole


and yes waring tribes would sell their war prisoners off to slavers


why do you shits pretend that is denied by anyone?
 
Corazón said:
This is a great article in the Gleaner, at least they are prepared to face the unpalatable truth that PC obsessed America chooses to ignore. I am hoping there will come a day when Americans can confront the past like they are doing in Jamaica but I won't hold my breath.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20151025/africas-role-slavery



Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


Your theory that American somehow are hiding from the fact that Africans sold Africans into slavery and Africans in America also owned slaves is ridiculous nobody's hiding from it you're just making up crap to make crap up so you can post crap
 
Corazón said:
This is a great article in the Gleaner, at least they are prepared to face the unpalatable truth that PC obsessed America chooses to ignore. I am hoping there will come a day when Americans can confront the past like they are doing in Jamaica but I won't hold my breath.

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/focus/20151025/africas-role-slavery



Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Text Drivers are Killers said:
The Civil War was NOT fought to free the slaves, you ignorant fool. How could it be when

1. There were four UNION states that practiced slavery throughout the war. KY MD MO DE. Had 300,000 slaves total.

2. There were many UNION generals who were slave owners. Even Grant had a slave and his wife had a bunch of them.

3. Lincoln asked slave owner Robert E Lee to be commander of all UNION forces.

The idea that the CW was about freeing the slaves is not only wrong, it is preposterous. It's fake news the media has been feeding us for 150 years.
Click to expand...


You're just another Confederate apologist nothing more. The South obviously seceded over slavery in an attempt to retain it it's in all of their articles of secession. This is the place where an education comes in and you don't have one.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
The Civil War was NOT fought to free the slaves, you ignorant fool. How could it be when

1. There were four UNION states that practiced slavery throughout the war. KY MD MO DE. Had 300,000 slaves total.

2. There were many UNION generals who were slave owners. Even Grant had a slave and his wife had a bunch of them.

3. Lincoln asked slave owner Robert E Lee to be commander of all UNION forces.

The idea that the CW was about freeing the slaves is not only wrong, it is preposterous. It's fake news the media has been feeding us for 150 years.
Click to expand...

this is why we dont let racists define racism to write the history


warning sarcasm present:did you know people who hold racist views are proven to have brains that wieght less than normal brains and have less synapsis
 
Last edited:
katzgar said:
Your theory that American somehow are hiding from the fact that Africans sold Africans into slavery and Africans in America also owned slaves is ridiculous nobody's hiding from it you're just making up crap to make crap up so you can post crap
Click to expand...
Do you think that is taught in schools, universities or depicted in Hollywood films? Is it fuck, the Jamaicans are far ahead of you in confronting the unpalatable truth. So spare me your pompous PC platitudes.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
evince said:
this is why we dont let racists define racism to write the history


did you know people who hold racist views are proven to have brains that wieght less than normal brains and have less synapsis
Click to expand...
Yours must be the size of a walnut then.

Sent from my Lenovo K8 Note using Tapatalk
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...d-human-brain--people-racists-knowing-it.html



Racism is 'hardwired' into the human brain - and people can be prejudiced without knowing it
Same circuits that allow people to judge ethnic groups also drive emotional decisions
Even 'right thinking' people can have racist attitudes
Racism operates below the conscious level


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...-people-racists-knowing-it.html#ixzz4yPny1Bww
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...d-human-brain--people-racists-knowing-it.html




http://www.science20.com/news_artic...st_are_you_secretly_racist_hint_you_are-92783



Implicit Association Test: Are You Secretly Racist? (Hint: You Are)
By News Staff | August 6th 2012 11:03 AM | 94 comments | Print | E-mail | Track Comments


It's American election season and that means it is time for psychologists to introduce racism again - not whether you are racist, but how much.

Well, only white people are, said a talk at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association. Even if they do not have any racist thoughts or lock their car door when they see a young, black man on the sidewalk and voted for Obama in 2008, white people still are; and their racial attitudes, both conscious and unconscious, may be a significant factor in this year's U.S. presidential election. A survey says so.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top