Go pick up your marbles tsuke, before they're all lost.
blacks get 230 bonus points in sat latinos 185 bonus points asians get -50.
- Thread starter tsuke
- Start date
Go pick up your marbles tsuke, before they're all lost.
cawacko
Well-known member
I agree with you although it does remind me of VP Joe Biden making the "they will put y'all back in chains" remark to a black audience regarding Republicans and the financial markets.
It was a mixed audience according to this article.
"Campaigning in southern Virginia on Tuesday, Vice President Biden told an audience that Mitt Romney's approach to regulating the financial industry will "put y'all back in chains," a remark that triggered a flurry of Republican criticism, including a sharp rebuke from the presumptive GOP presidential nominee.
"Look at their budget and what they're proposing," Biden said. "Romney wants to let the - he said in the first hundred days, he is going to let the big banks once again write their own rules. Unchain Wall Street. They are going to put y'all back in chains."
Biden made the comments at the Institute for Advanced Learning and Research in Danville, where he kicked off a two-day campaign tour of southern and southwestern Virginia. He spoke before what appeared to be a racially varied audience of 900 people, and one prominent Republican suggested that his language could be interpreted as racially divisive."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...ou-all-back-in-chains/?utm_term=.997d3b284b7e
cawacko
Well-known member
Here's a CBS headline:
Biden tells African-American audience GOP ticket would put them "back in chains"
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-t...nce-gop-ticket-would-put-them-back-in-chains/
Hard to know what to believe. The headline makes it seem the entire audience was African-American yet the first sentence says the audience was diverse.
"Vice President Joe Biden on Tuesday told a diverse crowd here, including many African-Americans, that presumptive Republican nominee Mitt Romney would "put you all back in chains" by unshackling Wall Street."
cawacko
Well-known member
Say it was 50% black. Why make that specific reference?
He was thinking about Obama?..............
cawacko
Well-known member
Sure think TDAK. You put yourself in chains by choosing to be as ignorant as you are.
why would democrats encourage illegal immigration to compete with the unemployed?
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
So they stay unemployed, stay on welfare and are beholden to their masters.
The question mark after the sentence about great achievers means it was a question. Before I can answer I need to know if benefiting from affirmative action is viewed as an achievement.
A simple yes or not would suffice.
The sad part is, based on how blacks overwhelmingly vote for Democrats, they have not problem with it.
It does when a question about achievement involves one of the groups that benefits from AA.
If someone achieves because they were given a head start based on AA, does that really mean they achieved?
Place the average person 50m ahead of a world class sprinter in a 110m race and the average person will get to the finish line first. Does that mean they achieved someone or are faster?
cawacko
Well-known member
This was his question:
Is your premise that you believe Blacks are subhuman? That even the greatest Black achievers (president, astronauts, physicists, billionaires, etc.) are your inferior?
AA has nothing to do with that. Pretty clear you lean towards answering yes but are looking for another way to say it.
If the supposed achievement is a result of being given an advantage through AA, it's not an achievement. Someone that benefits from AA is automatically inferior to those that achieve the same thing without it. White males don't achieve through affirmative action. You figure out what that means.
Pretty clear you think someone winning with a sizable head start means they actually did something on their own.
Then why does AA need to be in place if blacks achieved without it?
I already said that anyone relying on AA is inferior simply for that reason. If they weren't, why would they need to have it applied on their behalf? As I also said, white males don't benefit from it. Many other groups do though using characteristics that if used to deny would be considered wrong by the same ones that believe using those characteristics to benefit is perfectly OK.