AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Be part of the solution, not the problem.....
Exactly. So listen to your own advice, please.
Be part of the solution, not the problem.....
Exactly. So listen to your own advice, please.
I do. The left needs to get their heads out of their asses and increase their oxygen intake to their brains.
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.
It is your lucky day, because I just so happen to be a biologist... but it doesn't take a biologist to know what a woman is.Jackson: "I'm not a biologist." Too bad the Jackson-hating RWs think they are.
"[Rebecca]Jordan-Young, [a scientist and gender studies scholar at Barnard College whose work explores the relationships between science and the social hierarchies of gender and sexuality].said she sees Jackson's answer, particularly the second half, reflecting the necessity of nuance. While traditional notions of sex and gender suggest a simple binary – if you are born with a penis, you are male and identify as a man and if you are born with a vagina, you are female and identify as a woman – the reality, gender experts say, is more complex.
"There isn't one single 'biological' answer to the definition of a woman. There's not even a singular biological answer to the question of 'what is a female,'" Jordan-Young said.
There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align.
Sarah Richardson, a Harvard scholar, historian and philosopher of biology who focuses on the sciences of sex and gender and their policy dimensions, said Jackson's answer accurately reflects legal practice. While U.S. law remains an unsettled arena for the conceptualization and definition of sex, it frequently grounds sex categorization in biological evidence and reasoning. But like Jordan-Young, Richardson emphasized that biology does not offer a simple or singular answer to the question of what defines a woman.
"As is so often the case, science cannot settle what are really social questions," she said. "In any particular case of sex categorization, whether in law or in science, it is necessary to build a definition of sex particular to context."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/m...theres-no-simple-answer/ar-AAVsjzf?li=BBnb7Kz
It is your lucky day, because I just so happen to be a biologist... but it doesn't take a biologist to know what a woman is.
There is absolutely NOTHING that is complex about what a man and a woman are.
It is your lucky day, because I just so happen to be a biologist... but it doesn't take a biologist to know what a woman is.
There is absolutely NOTHING that is complex about what a man and a woman are.
So you say.
Did you learn this in your studies?
There are at least six different biological markers of “sex” in the body: genitals, chromosomes, gonads, internal reproductive structures, hormone ratios and secondary sex characteristics. None of the six is strictly dichotomous, Jordan-Young said, and the different markers don’t always align.
What about karyotypes?
Why is it relevant?
It isn't. That Blackburn idiot was just trying for a "gotcha" against Jackson.
Hey Christiefanny...
What did one saggy boob say to the other saggy boob?
We better get some support before people think we're nuts !
Dachshund
DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
It isn't. That Blackburn idiot was just trying for a "gotcha" against Jackson.
I agree with her about the hospital. Did you think I wouldn't? It's truly awful that this assault was covered up for over a year by those dunderheads at the unnamed hospital, who took a very narrow position on what constitutes rape.
You are still posting BS from a non science person Christie.
Would you believe it if a science person said it?
I was confused about what exactly you were saying, you seemed more concerned with bashing the DM.
"Can you define woman" is what the Repub cabal decided on using as a gotcha question. It has no meaning to a supreme court judge and has never been used before. It shows how little Repubs had to work with. She is highly qualified as the ABA rated her. This is a horrible attcack and should be laughed at.I cannot believe any person is really convinced it matters. It certainly is not a problem the SCOTUS had to adress. If it were, the judges have a staff to do the work .
Do rightys know what clowns this method of attack is making them into?