That is for a jury to decide not you.You say he went looking for them, but there is no evidence. He certainly did not find them, so it really does not matter. The second attack was by a man not at the first attack.
That is for a jury to decide not you.You say he went looking for them, but there is no evidence. He certainly did not find them, so it really does not matter. The second attack was by a man not at the first attack.
It is a factual statement. The second attack was by a man who was not at the first attack. If he was searching for the people who attacked him before, he did not find them, so it really does not matter.That is for a jury to decide not you.
He went out of his way and got a gun and went back. He was hoping they would show up again. And they did.
He went looking for a confrontation. That’s not self-defense.
And it's crickets from the left
Kyle didn't leave and come backUnless, of course, you're white and are fat murderboy Rittenhouse, then you're a MAGAT hero. *eyeroll*
It is a factual statement. The second attack was by a man who was not at the first attack. If he was searching for the people who attacked him before, he did not find them, so it really does not matter.
The police say he is innocent, but they cannot drop charges. That means that either the prosecutor will drop charges, or the prosecutor will allow a grand jury to drop charges.
You don't know if there is no evidence. All you have is a very biased article . This altercation was witnessed. The police know a lot more about this altercation than you do. They think he had turned into the aggressor. This is for a jury to look at all the evidence available and then make a decision.You say he went looking for them, but there is no evidence. He certainly did not find them, so it really does not matter. The second attack was by a man not at the first attack.
Kyle didn't leave and come back
He armed himself and went back to the scene of the first altercation. That is evidence. He didn't have to return to the scene. He was seeking another altercation because he had armed himself. If I had done the same thing in Texas I would be arrested. I'm a concealed carrier and I understand the laws in Texas. If this guy had armed himself and ran into the other guys at a totally different place the next day. He might not have been arrested.You say he went looking for them, but there is no evidence. He certainly did not find them, so it really does not matter. The second attack was by a man not at the first attack.
What was illegal about his bang bang?No, he just marched around in the streets, screaming insults at protesters and flourishing his (illegal) bang-bang until he was seen as a threat and some bystanders tried to take it away from him.
What was illegal about his bang bang?
Like I said that is for a jury to decide not you.It is a factual statement. The second attack was by a man who was not at the first attack. If he was searching for the people who attacked him before, he did not find them, so it really does not matter.
The police say he is innocent, but they cannot drop charges. That means that either the prosecutor will drop charges, or the prosecutor will allow a grand jury to drop charges.
He was allowed to use the gun by the legal owner of the gun. Totally legal which is why he was found not guilty.He was not of age to legally possess or flourish it. A friend got it for him.
Pesky details.Kyle didn't leave and come back
You have ZERO proof for that. Sort of like Medicaid doctors requiring people with 15% EF to return to work.One of us should bookmark this discussion, keep an eye on new developments, and post it when the spurious charges are dropped.
This discussion wouldn't even exist had the bicyclist been White and the aggressors Black... unless it was posted to scream in outrage about reverse racism.
Indeed…those pesky details (credit to TOP).Pesky details.
Ouch!You have ZERO proof for that. Sort of like Medicaid doctors requiring people with 15% EF to return to work.
If white the shooter would have been called racist and would have protest for him to be charged with murderOne of us should bookmark this discussion, keep an eye on new developments, and post it when the spurious charges are dropped.
This discussion wouldn't even exist had the bicyclist been White and the aggressors Black... unless it was posted to scream in outrage about reverse racism.
In Wisconsin a minor can carry a shotgun or rifle... you are a fucking idiotHe was not of age to legally possess or flourish it. A friend got it for him.