Bizarre rants, personal feuds, and outright lies!

Jarod said:
Now you have changed your claim to "she leaned on it". However even that is FALSE. You should really read up on your right wing claims, an honest person can see they are mostly false.
Click to expand...

stop lying.....you are giving trial lawyers a bad rep......
 
Seahawk said:
Talk about bizarre rant.

"This is not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes," she declared, claiming Trump could start a war just because somebody "got under his very thin skin."

160602155907-04-hillary-clinton-0602-medium-tease.jpg
Click to expand...

we need Trump to stand between Hillary and the nuclear codes.......
 
Jarod said:
"There is no risk of losing peoples lives if you blow up a golf course deal!"

"Donald Trump does not no anything about the world nuclear situation, ask him, it will become clear very quickly"

"We all know the tools DT brings to the table, bragging, threatening, writing nasty tweets"
Click to expand...

Which is more than HRC can offer.
Even she could not name an accomplishment of hers.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Jarod will pretend he cannot hear the audio.....
Click to expand...
I listened to it again. She mentiones Bengazi -she mentions the other capitols that had riots. and there she mentions the video.

In other words she did not separate the 2 by saying Bengazi was different.
If she believed so -she should have separated them, instead of back to back conflations..
But this is a woman who still -to this day -defends her main role in the destruction of Libya as "smart power"


During the primary debates Rand Paul went after her "adventurism" as he called it
and correctly stated "Libya is a jihadist wonderland"

Trump is still incorrectly saying ISIS in Libya is "controlling" Sirte oilfields ( they are fighting near them )
-so she gets away with it by Republican stumbling in the hearings
and Trumps notorious lack of attention to detail .

Honestly I think Clinton is much more dangerous in terms of war entanglements -she already has the track record.
 
Teflon Don said:
Well she is responsible for Syria.
Click to expand...
no. only Libya directly.
for Syria she shepherded "friends of Syria" which was shuttle diplomacy to organize opposition to Assad.
It weakened assad ( by aiding opposition) -but not to the point of toppling him.

But here are SO MANY factors players in Syria no one actor gets the blame.

Clinton calls for 'friends of democratic Syria' to unite against Bashar al-Assad
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/05/hillary-clinton-syria-assad-un


secretary of state said the international community had a duty to halt ongoing bloodshed and promote a political transition that would see Assad step down. She said the "friends of Syria" should work together to promote those ends.
The creation of a formal group of like-minded countries to co-ordinate assistance for Syria's opposition, similar to the Contact Group on Libya that oversaw international aid for opponents of Muammar Gaddafi, is possible.
However, in the case of Libya, the group also co-ordinated Nato military operations to protect Libyan civilians, something that is not envisioned in Syria.

US officials said a group would work to further squeeze the Assad regime by enhancing sanctions, unite disparate opposition groups inside and outside the country, and provide humanitarian relief.
 
Jarod said:
She talks of two separate things, the attacks on Benghazi and separately the video.



You have absolutely NOTHING to support the lean on the video claim. You first said she blamed the video, when I am not around are you going back to that one?
Click to expand...

Here's Jarod trying to split another hare. :D

Splitting-Hairs-115942.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top