Bitter Media Plays with Approval Polls

Life is Golden

The Sage
In the month leaded up to the election on November 8th, we repeatedly demonstrated how the mainstream media polls from the likes of ABC/Washington Post, CNN and Reuters repeatedly manipulated their poll samples to engineer their desired results, namely a large Hillary Clinton lead (see "New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through 'Oversamples'" and "ABC/Wapo Effectively Admit To Poll Tampering As Hillary's "Lead" Shrinks To 2-Points"). In fact, just 16 days prior to the election an ABC/Wapo poll showed a 12-point lead for Hillary, a result that obviously turned out to be embarrassingly wrong for the pollsters.

But, proving they still got it, ABC/Washington Post and CNN are out with a pair of polls on Trump's favorability this morning that sport some of the most egregious "oversamples" we've seen. The ABC/Wapo poll showed an 8-point sampling margin for Democrats with only 23% of the results taken from Republicans...

...while the CNN poll showed a similar 8-point advantage for Democrats with only 24% of respondents identifying as Republicans.

"A total of 1,000 adults were interviewed by telephone nationwide by live interviewers calling both landline and cell phones. Among the entire sample, 32% described themselves as Democrats, 24% described themselves as Republicans, and 44% described themselves as independents or members of another party.


Of course, as we've repeatedly pointed out, these sampling mixes couldn't be further from reality.

And while a quick 2 second review of the methodology of these polls immediately reveals their obvious bias, here are some of the results.

ABC latched on to the conclusion that Trump is just being super mean to the media...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-...mp-favorabilty-through-aggressive-oversamples
 
....these sampling mixes couldn't be further from reality...ABC latched on to the conclusion that
Trump is just being super mean to the media... :readit:
 
On the 4:PM/ET radio news it's reported that Quinepiac lists Trump popularity at 37%.
Gallup lists it at 40%, perhaps within MOE.

However, the usual popularity pattern is for popularity to increase between election & inauguration.
Trump's is reportedly dropping, as the subject line of this topic indicates.

So why did voters wait until AFTER the election to check him out?
 
You folk got this backwards. All those Presidents that started off with high numbers? They all went down. Trump can only go up. Hmmmmmmm.
 
So this is going to be the new right-wing propaganda tactic in the Slump era.

Don't like what gets reported about him?

Just claim "fake news" or a "rigged system".

Just watch. Every screw up he commits will be denied and spun to sound like the media has it in for him.

We are now well on our way to "1984".

Figuratively speaking, of course.
 
You folk got this backwards. All those Presidents that started off with high numbers? They all went down. Trump can only go up. Hmmmmmmm.

But he can only go down when he's with Putin.

Putin won't allow him not to.
 
But he can only go down when he's with Putin.

Putin won't allow him not to.

I think many are wrong about what Trump will accomplish. He may not do it in a manner that is going to be acceptable to everyone, but I think he will get things done.
 
So this is going to be the new right-wing propaganda tactic in the Slump era.

Don't like what gets reported about him?

Just claim "fake news" or a "rigged system".

Just watch. Every screw up he commits will be denied and spun to sound like the media has it in for him.

We are now well on our way to "1984".

Figuratively speaking, of course.

Trump took the libtard 'fake news' meme and owned it.

The polls were fake in the election. This is more of the same.
 
The average of polls showed her 4 percentage points ahead. She was 2 percentage points ahead. They weren't that far off. Just go and live in la la land though.
 
Stick your head in the ground, it will make it easier to dislodge you in the tidal wave election of 2018. When Americans take they're country back from Russia.
 
I've already described how you were manipulating polling jargon with regards to "oversamples". In podestas own internal polling, he wanted a more accurate view of certain minority groups. So he ordered "oversamples" of them. They were waited back down to size in the final poll, when looking at just the views of black people or Hispanics it makes those sections have a smaller margin of error. This had nothing to do with the national polls or anything publically available. Trumps own campaign did the same things with its polls, but their internal strategic notes weren't leaked for internet idiots to willfully misinterpret.
 
Back
Top