Birthright Citizenship....
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
The DOJ is not a branch of government, imbecile.
You are one colossally stupid imbecile.
Are you really that big of an idiot or do you just play one on the internet?
Because no human could be as stupid as you appear to be.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
Big surprise.
A trumper shitbag like you claiming that someone who impartially upheld the law was not independent.
Trump promised to do whatever it takes to end this insanity of birthright citizenship and he's not backing down.
No one ever said it was going to be easy. For whatever reason there is an entire culture of stupidity among us. Not a fucking one of the idiots can tell us why it's good for America but they just hate DJT so much common sense get's argued against. Really pathetic.
No one ever said it was going to be easy. For whatever reason there is an entire culture of stupidity among us. Not a fucking one of the idiots can tell us why it's good for America but they just hate DJT so much common sense get's argued against. Really pathetic.
no shit retardo - it is a department under one of the branches. the d stands for department and in your case dumb fuck
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
And it is SUPPOSED to operate in complete and total independence from the President, which it mostly has except for under sleazy scum buckets like trump and Nixon.
Your orange bowel movement trump thinks the DOJ is supposed to be his personal henchmen.
And scum like you are perfectly okay with that.
Big surprise, a Hamas traitor lying about the most corrupt AG in history. The scumbag who attempted to imprison political opponents in order to end free and fair elections. Nothing democrats hate worse than democracy. The foul goon who took 1500 Americans as political prisoners. Good thing Biden pardoned him, or there would be a reconning for that gangster thug of the Biden Junta.
Once again you prove there is NO hypocrisy like demopocrisy.
Again shit fer brains - what branch does the DOJ belong to?
Also, Pam Bondi is thousands of times more independent that Biden's hitman, Gangster Garland ever was. She hasn't raided Kam-Kam's home, or any of Quid Pro's 5 mansions the way Merrick Himmler did for his boss.
After 4 years of the Biden cartel using the DOI as a hit squad against him, where would he get such an idea?
And vermin like you cheered it on.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
I don't waste my time trying to have intelligent conversations with blabbering, conspiracy humping lunatics and shameless, blatant liars.
Call your mommy to bring you another Hot Pocket down to the basement for you
NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Birthright Citizenship is Constitutional Law.
Trumpanzees who claim to be defenders of the Constitution
should literally have their tongues ripped out of their heads.
Trumpanzees who claim to be defenders of the Constitution
should literally have their tongues ripped out of their heads.
So, I take it you're drunk off your ass already.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
When the argument is about 2A or abortion or any other issue they are obsessed with, they demand adherence to the exact wording, down to the letter, of the Constitution. Even down to the punctuation marks.
Mention the "well regulated militia" clause of 2A, they brush it off, then latch onto "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed", claiming to be constitutional literalists and arguing that it is not open to interpretation.
But now, when it has come to 14A, despite the fact that it clearly says "ALL PERSONS born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." They want to INTERPRET its meaning to suit their agenda.
They just get shittier and shittier with each passing day.
They made no ruling on birthright citizenship. Dumb shit.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
I think they are trying to get them to understand that you cannot do a nationwide injunction from a district court, you can do the injunction for your district, but you are not the overseer of the nation in a district court. Slapping their hands, basically. This is the second one in the same vein... First with district court trying to rule on something happening in a different district w/folks being sent to El Salvador from Texas, now with this...
It has more of a feel of "to predict" as a synonym for me... So I looked it up in Miriam Webster and I'd say it feels the same for them too.No, it isn't.
adjective
adjective: divine; comparative adjective: diviner; superlative adjective: divinest
of, from, or like God or a god.
adjective: divine; comparative adjective: diviner; superlative adjective: divinest
divine
Verb
[ T ]
to guess something:
[ + that ] I divined from his grim expression that the news was not good.
Study up on English.
divine
3 of 3
verb
divined; diviningtransitive verb
1
: to discover by intuition or insight : infer
The ruling allows them to act in areas that do not have an injunction so that action can be taken to rule on birthright citizenship. Basically, it allows what can be incorrect action so that someone will have standing. Just as we cannot bring a case to the supreme court to rule on SB 25-003 here in CO until someone's rights have been screwed.
Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).
Case Context: This 5-4 decision struck down restrictions on corporate and union spending in elections, citing First Amendment protections. It significantly expanded the role of money in political campaigns.
- Instance of Rebuke: Justice John Paul Stevens, in his dissent, again named specific justices—Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John Roberts, and Samuel Alito—criticizing their majority opinion for overturning precedent and adopting an overly broad view of free speech. Stevens wrote:
- Significance: Stevens’ dissent was unusually blunt, as naming colleagues in this manner is rare. His critique focused on the majority’s methodology and perceived overreach, reflecting deep frustration with the Court’s conservative shift. The public nature of the dissent, read from the bench, amplified its impact.
- Citation: Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).
Given we have twelve Federal Judicial Districts doesn’t that mean each district could have a different understanding on what is legal and not legal? They can revoke birthright citizenship in some Districts but not in others? And similar situations enforcing other policies halted by a District Federal Court?